Perceiving Aryanism and National Socialism

I can imagine that one day long ago when a system of mathematics, that eventually became one of Persia's greatest achievements in the form of algebra, started to play a key role in various transactions and this made certain sneaky merchants angry as it is harder to lie with numbers than it is with simple sleight of hand. Perhaps many of these dishonest merchants saw the logic of mathematics as "evil" since their schemes were now easily disprovable.

An analogous situation occurred in Germany when Adolf Hitler rose to power and very quickly started to push out all the Jewish schemes from the economy. Hence, National Socialism has been branded as "evil," since it caused trade, culture and society in Germany to be truly of the people and by the people thanks to its revolutionary new system. Those who did not wish to participate in, as well as those who sought to subvert, the new order were detained and set on course to be re-educated in camps. Hitler knew the dangers of subversion as it was such actions that caused the German defeat in the First World War... a war during which not one shell impacted German home territory. Marxist organized strikes, engineered class conflict, crafted hate of the intelligentsia and ethnic groups in addition to other subversions caused rampant chaos in Germany and in the newly created eastern nations of Czechoslovakia and Poland - strife in the Sudetenland and uprisings in Silesia as people felt displaced or left out from where they wished to be. No doubt that the sloppy Treaty of Versailles was meant to cause all of this. If it wasn't proven before, it was proven now - the masses are asses.

Enter Adolf Hitler. He had been carefully watching events unfold since his first sojourn as a student in Vienna - the futility of the parliamentary system, the dishonesty of the Press, the decaying of culture all at the hands of puppeteers who relished in chaos amongst the Goyim for it allowed them to implement their own selfish solutions and appear to be like geniuses and saviors - a perfectly fitting solution for the Jewish ego.

He saw what needed to be done

Out of chaos cannot come an order, but rather an order must be made from the chaos, for the chaos was Germany herself. Hitler wasn't seeking to advance the country, but first revert it back to a stage from which it can successfully advance - he believed in the Original Nobility of the Germans.

However, he also displayed a belief in the Nobility of other nations, namely the Slavs, who at the time were a great nuisance to Germany. Russia was overrun by Judeo-Marxists, the Czechs and Poles were aggressive about their new borders and the regions from Pomerania down to the Sudetenland saw ethnic strife, but most critically, the Soviets had already launched a war, barely after the conclusion of the giant preceding one. The Bolshevik onslaught was pushed back by the Poles after going as far as the outskirts of Warsaw. From this the Poles saw the USSR as their enemy, but also, in one of their greatest blunders, didn't see their German ally who had put forth conditions for the co-existence of Poland (as well as the Czechoslovak state) next to Germany as a joint buffer against Judeo-Bolshevik terror. The wise Hitler recognized his nation's real enemy and the enemy of all nations of men: it was the Jew who out of the chaos of the Great War was still busy creating more and more chaos on all fronts - social, geopolitical, economic.

The sleight of hand of the ancient dishonest merchant had grown to horrific proportions. The ancient herder's manipulative tactics had adapted into an intimidating and complex force.

Adolf Hitler didn't back down in cowardice of it all, he wasn't baffled into fear by the sheer scope of it, he wasn't selfish and thus didn't keep the solution to himself for his own gain.

THE ANSWER

"I have no hesitation in saying that in those men who seek to-day to embroil the patriotic movement in religious quarrels I see worse enemies of my country than the international communists are." ~Adolf Hitler

It applies to every country and international relations.

Revert the mess of society back to this:

Thus, making it possible to progress forward to this:

The key perception that we must see is that National Socialism is as German as Algebra is Persian or Geometry is Greek. Each has its source and will forever be known as hailing from there, but the applicability of each is so universal that it should be absolute standard. Algebra and Geometry are standards, however, National Socialism is not. Algebra's application, though, has been corrupted by the Jew who is at the ridiculous point of pulling numbers out of thin air, or simply typing them into a digital interface, so as to push forward his false transactions - it's the same old lying merchant and manipulative herder at work.

The result:

Confinement

Aryanist solution and continuation of Hitler's Kampf:

FREEDOM

Luther: Questions and Struggle for Truth

Revolutionaries challenge established powers. This starts by asking a few, often simple, questions and then proceeds, if it indeed it reaches that key stage, into a struggle that redefines the limits of the revolutionaries' will power. Success will make them remembered by following generations, however it is their struggle that will make them great. For without it, there would be nothing.

Martin Luther is one of history's most famous revolutionaries. His daring to ask certain unorthodox questions led to the Protestant Reformation, which, in turn, led to the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation, and both redefined the Christian faith and its followers.

The 2003 film Luther is a dramatization of the German's life. It remains reasonably faithful to his life story, the key part of it that it covers, but it also makes some key omissions and in the end reduces Luther's message to a contemporary humanist level.

Film Summary
There is a clever device right in the film's opening credits: the film's title first appears as Luther's signature - it is literally "written" onto the screen - before the conventional printed title appears. A signature is supposed to connote authenticity. As if it is Martin Luther himself telling the story.

We then see a young man scared for his life in the middle of field as a furious thunderstorm is raging. The young man says that he will give his life to serving God if only his life be spared. This is Martin Luther. He keeps promise and begins to study theology and soon joins the priesthood. During his first mass, young Luther seems taken in by light streaming through the stained glass window above - is it wonder? awe? - and it causes him to fumble his first mass, much to his father's dissatisfaction. Luther's father even doubts his son's motivations for becoming a priest, but the young priest only relents.

He enters into an abbey and soon finds himself on his first pilgrimage to Rome. It is right there, in the center of Christendom, that he sees what will set the course for the rest of his life. In the church, before when he fumbled the mass, Luther saw a glimpse of his ideal - a direct connection to God, a personal connection that one faithful person can experience and learn from; now in Rome, Luther sees what he feels that the faithful need to move away from - these are the infamous “indulgences” and the market that deals with them. Much to Luther’s surprise, it is possible, according to Roman Law, to buy one’s way into Heaven. Or to shorten your dead relatives’ time in Purgatory, or even release them early. As Johann Tetzel, salesman of indulgences, puts it: "Coin in the coffer rings, a soul from Purgatory springs" thereby effectively reducing the idea of spiritual salvation down to an advertising slogan. Luther quickly sees the absurdity, hypocrisy and downright ignobility in the selling of indulgences. He even says that the indulgence certificate received upon purchase is “just paper.”

Interestingly, when Tetzel is first shown holding one of these certificates (or “guarantees” or whatnot), he shot is framed so that it is seen through fire - a not so subtle connection to the fear-mongering hellfire speech that he had just given in that scene in order to scare peasants into buying his indulgences.

Throughout the film, Luther is framed with sunlight in key scenes. This can be first seen when he is scrubbing the floors of his abbey, making them very sparkly and clean and his mentor even jokes that he is working himself to hard. This scene comes after Luther’s first trip to Rome and he was angry with all the hypocrisy that he saw, which included monks buying sex and a glimpse of Papal pomp. In the scrubbing scene, after his mentor’s bit of humor, Luther hoists himself up from the floor and then while still kneeling he is framed to match a tall sun lit window in the back and the floor he scrubbed shines bright. It is a brief scene, but a very telling one in that it gets to the essence of Luther’s struggle: it is the effort that counts, not the money. Luther sought to teach that Christians can make themselves free from sin by emulating Christ, through the effort of faith and the rejection of materialism like indulgences and idol worship.

After he makes his ideas officially public with the famous 95 Theses, Luther is slapped with excommunication and a bounty is put on his head, but one of his friends from a high place gives him sanctuary. Luther then goes on to translate the New Testament from Latin into his vernacular German. This great effort would go on to help standardize the German language as well as add refinements to the science of translation.

Luther starts a populist wave, of sorts, with his bringing of Scripture into the vernacular. Much to his dismay this brings its share of violence and madness, but in the end, his teachings catch on and garner intelligent followers. The film, especially, by the end, becomes a rather romanticized and idealized version of Luther’s story, but how can three tense decades be compressed into two hours without such storytelling devices? They really cannot.

The film ends in 1530 right after the Diet of Augsburg when a now happily married Luther learns that Roman Law no longer looms over Germany.

Almost Aryanism
The overall portrait of Martin Luther as seen in this film can be described as humanist. He is shown as a warm-hearted man who is disgusted with Vatican hypocrisy and sets out to counter it. There is a theme of "freedom" in the contemporary liberal sense of "giving it to the people" as Luther seeks to make the Bible available to commoners. That's not an ignoble goal, but critically short of Aryanism. The overarching notion here is similar to the end of the Lord of the Rings film adaptation, which has that critical deviation from the source novel, and that is: someone capable will bring good to the world, all you have to do is "have faith." This theme can also be seen in comic books as superheroes fight super-villains, while ordinary people look on in terror and awe knowing that they could never rise up to such feats. It's a rather prevalent form of mass pacification.

The intensity of Luther's struggle is also toned down. During the months when he was translating the Bible into German, Luther suffered from various ailments that caused him great pain - these are only mentioned in passing in the film and the character on screen looks more like a book worm or nerd as he notices a subtlety in the translation process - something most others would find trivial - while sitting on the floor in a room with papers strewn all over. That must have been part of the struggle, however, the key part was Luther's spiritual battle. The will to overcome a grand corrupt scheme, one that has propaganda and blindly loyal enforcers nearly everywhere. There are some scenes of this inner battle, most notably right before the Edict of Worms is passed, but it is a shame that this wasn't made into one of the film's key themes or had a series of scenes throughout the film and each one would progress. It was with such sleepless nights and brainstorms that must have brought Luther's revolutionary ideas into action. Being driven as such as he was could have only meant a treacherously rough ride.

The limited budget excuse doesn't cut it here. It was a theme that should have been developed from the very beginning of the film project, screenplay statge, and then wound up as a key aspect of the whole story. However, this watering down isn't nearly as deceptive as another aspect of the film. This particular part wasn't censored in anyway, it was just completely avoided.

Key Omissions
Anyone who knows the general story of Martin Luther right down to his biographers knows this: Luther hated Jews. The preceding three words are the biggest possible simplification that one can make on this controversial aspect about the founder of the Lutheran faith, but those words remain true. By delving deeper into this subject we can plainly see why it was avoided.

Firstly, there is the simplest reason: this aspect of Luther came at the end of his life. The film ends in 1530, while Luther's writings about Jews are from after 1537, the last nine years of his life. Thus, this was not included in the film as the core of what Luther had brought into the World had already been discussed.

That would be an acceptable reason, however take a look at the film's closing text:

"What happened at Augsburg pushed open the door of religious freedom. Martin Luther lived for another 16 years, preaching and teaching the Word. He and Katharina von Bora enjoyed a happy marriage and six children. Luther's influence extended into economics, politics, education and music, and his translation of the Bible became a foundation stone of the German language. Today over 540 million people worship in churches inspired by his Reformation."

It seems that the filmmakers just wanted to show a good-hearted humanist hero, one with heart of gold, as they saying goes. This could be for market value, but seeing that this was an independently produced film, in Europe (thus, no Hollywood), they were not too concerned with the profits of a potential huge hit. They made the film exactly as they intended: a humanist hero. Notice that this is also a common way to show Christ, Gandhi and other spiritual teachers. Yet, what do the two aforementioned spiritual leaders have in common with not just each other, but also with Martin Luther: they held a negative view of the Jews. All their writings and teaching have passed through the ZioSieve, so don't expect to read about any of this from any politically correct sources. PC is just a tentacle of ZC.

Secondly, with this in mind, let's return to the quote above. Now with an Aryanist understanding, "religious freedom" and "preaching and teaching the Word" means pointing out the vicious and hypocritical nature of Judaism as that is precisely what Luther did in those last years! It is not the information that ZC tries to hide, but a certain and vital understanding of it. Facts can be twisted and even made up, while a profound insight is practically untouchable.

There was another movie from 2003 called Hitler: The Rise of Evil (yes that's the actual title), which had similar manipulations of its historical main character. In a film about Hitler it is impossible not to mention Jews, even the 2004 film Der Untergang has a forcefully tacked on title card at the end with the "6 million figure" though it makes no references to Jewry otherwise. Due to this impossibilty of convenient omission, they mention Jews in a way that agrees with mainstream myth. The opening scenes show Hitler still as a child and we can see that his mother occasionally spouts something unpleasant about the Jews. This attempt at "honest" portrayal and the delving into the psyche of Hitler seems to suggest that hate is picked up from a poor upbringing. That Hitler was just a product of a World hateful to the Jews. This is pure folly.

In Mein Kampf - Hitler's own words - the first mention of Jews in on the bottom of page 42. I am referring to the downloadable PDF document on Aryanism's Main Site. This puts Hitler's first mention of Jews well into the second chapter in which he describes his life and work in Vienna. The first chapter is about his family and clearly from Der Fuhrer's own words he did not learn to hate the Jews from being exposed to bigotry at a young age. It wasn't racist propaganda that was engrained in his mind and then exploded in rage when he was an adult. That is what the Jew would like the Goy to think.

The fact is that Adolf Hitler and Martin Luther both started to despise the Jew from observation of their World and what Jewry does to it. Jews are not hated simply because they are Jews, that's irrational. Jews are despised for the most rational reasons possible: people eventually see what Jews stand for, believe in and seek to accomplish. Most critically, people eventually see what the Jews do in order to get their way. That is what gets people to detest Jews.

Martin Luther's treatise, On the Jews and Their Lies, was written in 1543, three years before his death. Luther's life was a struggle against corruption, materialism and hypocrisy - and he wound up despising Jewry with precise reasons as to why and that is no coincidence. It is men of such persistence who make such inevitable observations and it is them that the Jews hate the most. Luther's writing are a silver mirror. So are Hitler's. The Jew fears such things.

Hiding in the Dark
This film is also part of a general theme of "questioning Christianity." Movies repeatedly come out that raise such questions, most notably The Da Vinci Code and its source novel. Now, I do not believe the Christian faith is perfect and neither was Martin Luther, whose aforementioned treatise contains a fair bit of anger and advocates violent force to be used against Jews. I understand his anger, but do not condone nor advocate such courses of action.

What I do advocate is questioning all religious faiths, even picking apart the many absurdities in Judaism, which always seems to get a pass. The Talmud Code, anyone?

Such a project wouldn't get off the ground in the mainstream, Judeo-monopolized sphere, since the only people that can discuss such matters are Jews, whilst hiding in the dark, though, for imagine if someone saw Judaism as intrinsically absurd! We can bet that they would very quickly be labeled as an "anti-Semite." The accusations of heresy that were directed at Luther were pretty much the same; from the same kind of mindset, anyway.

Conclusion
When the full history of Martin Luther is considered we can see that one man's lifelong quest for truth and honor in spirituality leads him despise Jews. In the part of the film where Luther tells a woman that the indulgence she bought is "just paper" can be directly applied to the Fiat money scheme of today - money is literally "just paper." Further investigation will uncover who is really behind such things and a dedicated investigator will likely despise Jews even before he finds out authentic solutions to the problem.

The selling of indulgences was, in fact, a way to get people psychologically and spiritually hooked on a money-swindling scheme. Today's financial news that praises Judaized economics and economists for all their hard work in solving "crises" and other things works much the same way - combining fear and wonder the scheme rakes in loyal followers who will soon not even be aware of anything beyond it.

Note the Aryan definition of "Zion" - a sustainable system of slavery in which internal rebellion is no longer possible. Why is rebellion no longer possible? Likely not due to fear, but due to ignorance. Zion is a "mind-monopoly" where the prisoners can think of nothing other than serving Zion. Thus, even if anything else exists (like the Zionists' elite standings and luxuries) it becomes irrelevant by the system default. The horror is that the only possible setting in this system is "default."

To prevent such a nightmare from becoming reality, the story of Luther shouldn't be the main inspiration, but definitely one of them - a little stone to be inserted into the mosaic that is the Aryan Kampf.

A related essay HERE.

Tunnel Vision over at the Occidental Observer

Avatar, James Cameron's feel-good adventure story is wholly unoriginal on the Storytelling Front, but very imaginative in the visual department. Since it was a such a huge production with the highest budget thus far allotted for a movie project and the biggest box office intake as of this date with some $2.5 billion in Worldwide earnings, it speaks a good deal about what today's audience likes: elaborate sights and sounds with simplistic story arcs.

The BS Gentiles at The Occidental Observer reviewed this film and that was really just a continuation of their fixation on white race preservation as can be read in this review of the blockbuster film. Replace "white" with "Jew" and you'll have a typically racist, rabbi written op-ed.

In the article, Kevin MacDonald writes: 

"So, in a nutshell, Whites from Earth are colonizing another planet whose indigenous wonderful hominids with primitive technology but great butts and neural connections to plants and animals, are in the way of The Company which wants its precious mineral called Unobtainium. (This was the only in joke in the movie I think.) There are a couple of social workers trying to get the natives to move and save Precious Life. They are of course outmaneuvered by the capitalists who want their unobtainium and start to bulldoze the magic forest."

If all MacDonald can observe about this film is that certain white characters are greedy and unpleasant, than he is missing much of point due to his skin-pigmentation fixation. He also misses the satire on Judeo-economics... "unobtanium" is quite the way to put it.

In the film, there are mixed characters on both sides. Good humans aren't all white and neither are the evil humans. Though, the commander of the mercenary unit deployed to protect The Company is white, as is the main representative of the evil corporation, and it is from these two bits that MacDonald's main concern springs: evil white people. Odd that a professor of psychology would evaluate character's based on their skin-color. How about delving into their... *ahem* ....psychology? Meaning, looking at the characters' intentions, goals, means to achieve these things, and the like. From this we can see that the commander and the corporate officer are slimy, arrogant bastards and deserve no sympathy from noble people.

Practically all of the main Zionists in Israel have light skin that could be called "white," so does this mean that MacDonald sympathizes with those war criminals? And does he find any news report that points out Israeli criminality as offensive, since it criticizes "white" people? It would seem so. MacDonald decidedly prefers the shallow end of the pool. His allegiance to his "white" skin is like the Jews' allegiance to the Law of the Rabbis - what's good for (my group's name here) is good in all senses of the word.

More from MacDonald's article:

"So, the Good pseudo-native , like in The Last Samurai, goes native and war is begun with the CapitalistImperialistWhitePigs. Spectacular battle scenes with the Good natives mounted on the backs of flying Teradactyl like birds beating the White Man’s machines. As in Tarzan movies, the animals also come to the aid of the natives, after having sensed that the White Man is a greater danger.

In the battle, the chief Bad Guy is a jarhead (Marines) colonel who wants to kill all the Good Natives. Blue eyes and a very White Marine, he of course, is beaten by bows and arrows and big scary animals (a la Tarzan). As he is about to kill our pseudo-native hero, who has of course betrayed the mission of The Company, the colonel yells, “How does it feel to be a race traitor?” With that, two arrows from the love-interest native female sink into his chest."

MacDonald's race-themed defensive posture is virtually identical the ever-apologetic Jew, who will always find a way to mask or excuse his deeds - from cries of "anti-Semitism" and "blood libel" to the quintessential racist attitude of "We're the Chosen People." The BS Gentiles at TOO simply substitute "White" for "Jew." In their eyes, criticizing whites is "anti-White" or maybe "anti-Occidentalism."

By the time the reader reaches this part of the article, it comes as no surprise that MacDonald chose to end his piece with the most overt racism - a saving the "best" for last sort of thing via the BS Gentile mindset.

"Like Bladerunner’s replicants, the natives are more human than homo sapiens — Whites that is. The few other folks who help the natives are Earthlings — Blacks and browns, who of course, side with the natives. They recognize a brother when they see one."

Oh boy. Quite the absurdity, in addition to the racism.

At no point in the film is it so bluntly said that the Na'vi (the "natives" from Avatar) are "more human" than the humans. What is said, via the story, is that they are less overcome by greed and material desire. This makes them more noble and thus they are the story's good-guys.

"The material interest of mankind can prosper only in the
shade of the heroic virtues. The moment they become the primary considerations of life they wreck the basis of their own existence." ~Adolf Hitler

The human mission on planet Pandora is primarily concerned with material interests, while the Na'vi are heroically defending their homeland. That is why the humans and their corporation loses. However, by the end, a few humans, the noblest stock, joins the Na'vi. They do this to pursue ideals and probably didn't consider "race." In fact, in the film, it is only the bigoted Gentiles that bring up "race" and such terms. They cannot see past the end of their nose.

I do agree with MacDonald that Avatar paints a pessimistic portrait of humans, however, unlike him, I am not at all surprised. Just look at the day's news, mainstream source or not: there's violence, treachery, greed and hate that comes from people of all colors. Oddly, since MacDonald is so Euro-centric, he only sees the media point out evil white men and takes offense to this. That sort of arrogance and ignorance hand-in-hand is very Jewish.

The fact is, all peoples suffer and all peoples are to blame. The state of the World is decayed, decadent and filled with drudgery. The popular films that come out simply reflect this. Complaining about such a film is like complaining to a mirror for showing you a scar on your face - it's not the mirror's fault! You did something that gave you a scar and the complaints won't help heal it.

"Man has become great through perpetual struggle." ~Adolf Hitler

And he can become great again, but this means primarily proactive effort. This means seeing your own faults in addition to those of others, and this is something the Gentiles lack.

Taking a look at this essay is a good start for them to steadily veer away from simplistic bigotry and tunnel vision.

Alternate version of the rebuttal HERE

Observations Around Society

Popular culture is in a pretty low state these days. Western culture has become driven by promise of plenty via little to no effort. Indulgence has become a good thing, as long as a worker doesn't neglect their responsibilities more than the relativist boss allows; this inevitably leads to cutting corners in effort all the while expecting more in return for the work performed. These indulgent desires spill over even more in social life as I have seen during my socially bizarre journey through college. Instead of discussing things like literature, history, politics, our studies or anything mentally stimulating, the point of social activity was inebriation in its highly limited number of forms. By now it has gone so far that most people take these absurdities as normal. It is a dangerous mix of decadence and accepting an overarching fate.

Gizmos are also a big thing today - a small portable phone with a camera and internet access is, by today's standards, simply a "cell phone." Added to the fact that most of these devices even have a multitude of "applications." One of these "apps" (people don't even say whole words these days) was called "The Lightsaber Application" and the whole thing was a simple display of the famous Star Wars prop that made the associated sounds as you move the phone around. Pointless - a goy bisciut - but people go nuts for these things.

My cell phone camera, which has spent a great deal of time being perfectly useless, or one could say "dormant," up until fairly recently when I decided to put it to use by noting several observations around society.

PHOTO 1
This appears to be an ad for the fast food chain McDonald's that tries to tap into the "more is better" craze. The man looks sad that he is only getting a small chocolate dessert with water, instead of a gargantuan portion of culinary chemistry in both solid and liquid form.

On slightly closer inspection you can see that it is actually a satire on McDonald's. Note the smaller print (click image for larger version) that outlines the dangers of consuming fast food, yet it does it within the confines of the ad, which grinds not only against McDonald's, but also against the elusive quality of corporate advertising. It also looks like the text of "possible side effects" that prescription medicine commercials have: while showing happy people the narrator quickly reads off a list of possible side effects and if written out, they may very well be as long that the ones listed here.

PHOTO 2
Next we have a joke about the absurdity of too much free choice or uninformed free choice.

This is part of the whole "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" debate. The details of said debate are beyond the scope of this essay, but it is worth noting that absurdity is gripping an ever firmer hold on our society. The obsession of "rights" and "free choice" is one such thing as this cartoon demonstrates. Citizens of an Aryan State do not have "certain inalienable rights" as the whole concept of "right" is un-Aryan. Rather, citizens of an Aryan State have certain unassigned, yet always active, duties. Ensuring that the younger generation has plenty of chances to bloom with a solid education is one of them. When that is done with rationalism, the younger generation will have much free choice and, critically, their options will not be as ridiculous as the ones pictured above. The Historic Aryan Farmer lets his crops grow as they please, but first ensures the soil is fertile for them to do so.

PHOTO 3
A humorous take on the Arizona immigration issue. There is an NS joke in there, but I think that only reinforces a truth that most Americans are not aware of (due to corrupt education) or one that they just simply deny.

The power of an astute message is awesome.

PHOTO 4
A political cartoon that shows the nature of Judaic selfishness.

The black splotch over the Goldman-Sachs banksters looks like a simple space-filler for the composition, but to me it looks like a monstrous belch of pollution and it appropriately radiates from Lloyd Blankfein's rotten corpus.

PHOTO 5
This is largely self-explanatory.

It is also largely true. Click to read text in larger version.

PHOTO 6
Very interesting image here. Look carefully.

Some very interesting details here. First off, Adolf Hitler, apparently, wasn't the worst tyrant of them all. The death tally attributed to each of these leaders has drifted to and fro and varied from source to source, but this only points out the quality of the mainstream. I have seen 20 million next to Stalin before. For Mao, this is quite low as I have usually seen him "awarded" with 50 to 70 million. However, the 15 million by Hitler is quite strange. The official "holocaust" narrative comes to a total of 6 million. The total dead during WW2 is commonly said to be 50 million, and Hitler has been blamed for starting the war, so why not just make him the worst of the three leaders here? Probably, because that is so ridiculous that it cannot even make it into the mainstream. Thus, Hitler is left with just 6 million, but then he would look fairly tame next to the others, so the cartoonist just multiplied by... er, 2.5... yeah.

What is also interesting is the shape of each head. Note the roughly pyramid shape, which could possibly refer to the "evil power pyramid" as seen on the back of the US Dollar Bill. Each leader's two eyes would be below the ominous all seeing eye at the pyramid's apex. As they are drawn this "third eye" seems to be in their brains - evil men thinking up evil schemes. Stanley Kubrick would approve of this view and showed many ominously themed pyramid compositions (particularly in A Clockwork Orange) and also equated the NS movement to absolute evil (even in the same movie).

Though, as we have seen, the false images are such cartoons.

NOW BEST FOR LAST

PHOTO 7
There was a large tack board that I passed one day and saw a very interesting detail. The frame of the board was lined with 4 identical strips that has a design of various international flags. Coincidentally (or perhaps not) the German flag and the Israeli flag were next to one another. There was also a tiny and precise bit of vandalism that was quite consistent. The top strip was covered with announcements and photos, thus mostly obscured. However, the other three were very visible. I photographed a detail from each of those. Click image for larger version.

Ownage!

This was in the halls of a New York university and there are many Arabic students enrolled at this school who no doubt have expressed their feelings on a certain illegally occupied territory that is administered by criminals guilty of mass murder and actual blood libel.

Society, there is much in the details.

The Boromirs Among Us: Occidental Observer

Response to this 12/26/2010 article by Edmund Connelly in The Occidental Observer.

Connelly makes some accurate observations about Zionist crime that is intrinsically tied to the supremacist and hate perpetuating ideology of Judaism, but his article is only a brushing on the dirty surface and not an exposing of the rotten core.

Connelly begins by clearly pointing out that the United States should in no way consider Israel an allied nation and names the Lavon Affair (with a link to the Wikipedia article, nonetheless) as the reason. From reading about such an event we can assume that most truly inquisitive readers (as are those who veer away from mainstream information) will then go on to see that the Lavon Affair was but the start of an era of hidden Israeli aggression against the United States and the West.

Connelly then suggests that there is actually a far more constant and far more subtle war going on and that is one of "laying the mental threads." Citing several example of documentary works that have investigated the portrayal of Arabs (and all Muslims, really) in film, as well as referring to the 1998 movie The Siege, which is likely a part of this grand anti-Arab propaganda campaign, Connelly makes his point that Hollywood is actually a "Jewish fiefdom" that is working to manipulate all Americans into hating Arabs and Muslims.

Now, is Connelly genuinely concerned about the racism that is directed at these people? One would think so, but unfortunately Connelly then fumbles with the following contradiction:

"The issue is not really whether these images have a substantial element of truth. Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet these days to be terrorists."

And so, Connelly has not only spotted racist propaganda, but he has also eaten his fair share - he bought it hook, line and sinker!

First off, Connelly is going by the ZC prescribed definition of terrorist, which essentially means "angry looking Muslim." If we look at the word "terrorist" with a bit of rationalism we can come to the simple conclusion that a "terrorist" is simply someone who frightens people. Fear of death is the most effective way to do this, thus they result to displays of large-scale violence and make sure that those casualty figures are well publicized. This definition fits a whole lot better with the Israeli Defense Forces than it does with a group of rebels who launch flimsy homemade rockets at their oppressors that have starved and occupied them since 1948. However, those oppressive criminals have a well oiled PR machine and media backing them up and shifting blame, thus Connelly should have said: "Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet to be shown as terrorists." This is the Zionists' most effective weapon of mass destruction.

Connelly seems to, more or less, acknowledge this fact in the article when he shows the 2008 film Taken and the popular television show 24 to be nothing more than Jewish manipulations to get Westerners to hate Muslims. This is, by and large, true: Taken had a Jewish screenwriter and 24, a Jewish producer. They were just doing their part to get Westerners to despise Muslims. So, Connelly is back to pointing out Jewish crimes and he even points out the sly inversion presented in Taken: the slave trade is actually more of a Jewish crime, than it is a Muslim one. He uses this story from the Jerusalem Post to point out a key aspect of Jewish racist double-standard: in Israel, slavery is legal if it involves non-Jews. The main victims are young Slavic women who are conned into going to Israel with bogus job prospects. Connelly also mentions that Jews, a disproportionately influential minority, seem to not mention themselves in the movies and stories that they produce.

Connelly then ends his article with a bit of xenophobia by saying that the film Taken "provides a useful function by again alerting Americans, French, and other Westerners to the risk posed by the presence of alien elements amongst us." He is back to buying the propaganda that the Jew never ceases to sell. Oddly, in the same paragraph he seems to scold many of the aforementioned Westerners for "worshipping" Jews and Israel.

In the end, Connelly's article is an uncoordinated blast off into the general right direction - he recognizes his enemy, but doesn't realize many of his potential allies. He also doesn't attack the core of Jewish thinking, but rather just presents empirical observations about how Jews manipulate the world - that fact that he doesn't attack Jewry on ideological ground is his article's great fault. Added to the fact is that he is, in effect, using Jewry's methods against Jewry, thus will never really change anything. Things are doomed to forever be done in the immoral and nefarious Talmudic way unless those very methods are destroyed.

Connelly is a fine example of the Boromir Syndrome - "Let's use the enemy's weapon against him!" That's like saying you don't agree with Israelite usury and then round up all your friends so as to out-compete the moneychangers. Even if you win, the Beast lives on in you.

Connelly also writes, "While terrorism is one clear risk, it is not the only one, as Taken shows." Again, not fully false, but not fully true. Even Boromir realized that Sauron must be destroyed, but he just didn't see the correct way how to do it. "Terrorism" is a problem, yes, but does Connelly see the bulk of it as a Jewish media created mirage and/or Israeli false flags? He mentions skepticism for the official 9/11 story and the Lavon Affair, yet at the same time he still seems to believe the official hogwash stories and "explanations" - Connelly sees Taken as propaganda, but then actually buys its Jewish message.

With the examples of Jewish double-standards that Connelly provides, it is really hard to grasp why he doesn't wrap up the article with the point that Judaism is fundamentally immoral. It is the oldest lie-to-get-ahead scheme in the World. He doesn't mention that Jews view all non-Jews as "goys" - an exploitable resource in the form of sentient beings. He opposes the Jew, yet he doesn't hit him where it will deal the most effective strike to the Jewish lies. From this, we can see that he is, in all probability, being led by the Jew and doesn't even know it.

---------------------------

A Spoke in the Goy Wheel
---------------------------

Alternate version of the rebuttal HERE

The Aryan Kampf in "Lord of the Rings" - Part VI

Conclusion

After Aragorn's coronation as the new King of Gondor, the goals of the Kampf that the Fellowship set out on, have finally been accomplished. There is a spiritual progression throughout all of Middle Earth, but especially in the members of the Fellowship. Gandalf had ascended to Arhat much earlier, but now Frodo and Aragorn effectively join him. Also, given his ancestry, Aragorn taking his rightful (and dutiful) place on the throne at Minas Tirith is effectively the first major step in the reemergence of the Aryan civilization. However, since all key Aryan traits are not ethnic specific, the new standard of nobility that is now in place throughout Middle Earth is the real meaningful reemergence of Aryanism. One Aryan leader wouldn't mean much without a noble folk supporting him.

The Hobbits return to their Shire and most of the residents here are completely unaware just how monumental the past thirteen months have been. With their noble character, Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin expect no thanks, they just know that what they did was right and that's enough. This change of character can be seen as they share a pint of ale in their favorite tavern, the Green Dragon. They just sit in silence, with a sigh of relief, do a "cheers" and take a few relaxing sips of the ale that they haven't had for over a year. Note that in the background, the other Hobbits behave like, well, like Hobbits; they're rowdy and inebriated, but they do mean well, though only in a humanist (or maybe hobbitist?) sense. Our four little friends, however, have become conscious of Arya and Universalism. It also gives Sam that extra bit of confidence he needs to finally profess his love for Rosie, the alewife at the tavern.

The Scouring of the Shire
There is a very large deviation from the source material in this concluding series of scenes. In general, everything ends up in the films as it does in the books, but one key episode was omitted from the film version: the chapter entitled "The Scouring of the Shire."

This chapter begins right when Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin are returning to the lands of their Hobbit kin, but soon realize that something is very wrong. In short, the Shire has been over-run by thugs and also has been turned into crude industrial complex. To our heroes' surprise, it is all the work of Saruman along with his servant, Grima. In fact, what has been done in the Shire seems to mirror what happened at Isengard with the massive golem foundry for making orcs.

With this key episode Tolkien has effectively illustrated the arid hate and parasitic persistence that drives the Jewish subversion of nations and cultures; if one place doesn't work out, flee and hide for while until another opportunity is ready to be exploited. The forcing of destructive industrialization represents Tolkien's own fears from what he saw happen to the English countryside as many nations and economies started to get more and more mechanized. However, the well versed Tolkien must have also known about such things going on in the USSR and this is where the "rule by terror" notion seen in the story can be applied. It is a well known fact that at least 75% of all Soviet Commissars were atheistic Jews and they hated priests, yet held rabbis in high esteem, which of course, makes it plain that they just announced themselves as atheists, but secretly continued to practice Judaism. This also makes plain as to why the Soviet regime destroyed churches, but left synagogues standing. Saruman's actions in the Shire here are basically a line by line account of Bolshevik terror, but guised in story and metaphor.

Despite this different chapter in the book, Saruman's fate is very similar in both book and film. In both instances, Grima jumps up at him with a knife, but is then cut down by some well aimed archery. Though, in the book it is the Hobbits that fire the arrows. This also brings us to a key factor of message subversion. The movie shows the Hobbits living a peaceful life and not worrying about anything - all the important events take place elsewhere. Most people living today are in a situation analogous to Hobbit life - there is work, family, and job with the great big World beyond this immediate sphere and it is primarily seen through the media. Thus, the film's message is "don't worry, someone capable will fix all those horrible things you hear about." There is no doubt that Tolkien was well aware of the dangerous folly of such thinking and thus made it clear that ALL nations and folks must be ready to stand up and fight - even happy little Hobbits.

This review of the film The Dark Knight also examines the idea of ordinary people needing to unite to solve the plagues of their nation. Note the last section on the character, Brian.

Saruman's death in the film has metaphysical metaphors as we identified in Part V - he gets impaled on a symbolic Aryan Sun Wheel - while in the book he is driven out by Hobbit militarism with his death being a little more pitiful - he dies from the volatility of the situation that he is ultimately responsible for getting himself into. These two endings may take a different route, but wind up at the same meaning. The spoke wheel from the film could also be a link to Buddhism, which is an ideology that thoroughly rejects nefarious Talmudic materialism.

Saruman's Final Bane

Some Other Matters
Galadriel's Ring, which only shows up in one brief scene, can be seen to have six-points as the Judaic hexagram. However, Galadriel's ring is a flower, not a star, and on close examination you can see that the petals are "swooshed" to give it a spinning, or even Sun Wheel, appearance. The connection between Flower and Sun furthers this idea, thus the Rings that the Elves made to get knowledge about Middle Earth are shown as flowers to mean something along the lines of "blooming knowledge" from the Sun Wheel - the Swastika. Also, Galadriel's Ring is silver, while Sauron's Ring is gold. There is no doubt that a currency and monetary theme is at play here. Here some some interesting articles on the Aryan qualities of silver.

Perhaps the design choice of six petals was meant to appease Hollywood Jews, who just smelled a ton of money from the potential box-office success of an adaptation of such a popular book, but they didn't bother to look deeper and see that all the film's coherent symbolism and themes are actually Aryan!

Even the idea of the Elves "going West" has been inverted from its apparent Judaic/Masonic meaning. This was, of course, done by Tolkien long before the movie was made. In Freemasonry, when someone dies they are said to "go West." Tolkien ridiculed this idea by having immortal Elves go West! He flipped the Masonic idea on its head and probably had a good laugh about it. In the film version the last shot of the boat "going West" and into the Sun suggests that the departing Arhats are becoming one with Arya. It also looks a lot like a Viking funeral rite, in which the body was placed on a boat that was then lit as a funeral pyre and cast out towards the setting Sun. So, there are many interlocking metaphors here (as well as the satire) and they all tie in with Aryanism.

Passing into the Infinity of Arya

The one problematic thing seems to be that the one literal pyre that appears in the film is linked with Denethor's madness. Also, the dead at Rohan are buried in mounds. However, since the film takes place in the Third Age, before the Return of the King and Aryan Nobility, this can explain the lack of Aryanism in the lifestyles of much of the established nations.

Lastly, there is the idea of racial interpretation. The Gnostic Cross, which makes key appearances in the Hall of the King in Rohan and in the Royal Courtyard in Minas Tirith, is often used by White Nationalists. This can be seen on the main page of websites like "Stormfront" among others. This interpretation can be further solidified by the fact that all the good human characters appear to be Ethnic Europeans, while the bad humans are "The Men of the South" who can be seen as Moors or Arabs or even as Africans. Despite this, the racial interpretation is totally false. First off, the Corsairs who are mercenaries hired by Sauron, are shown to have many Whites among them, if not mostly Whites. Second, the orcs, who can occasionally be heard to speak English, have accents that can be heard around the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Thus, if race is applied to them, they'd could very well be White, though not necessarily due to the diverse population of those nations. The point is that this kind of interpretation of supposed racial supremacy falls flat on its face and cannot be made coherent through the whole story. Tolkien himself said that allegory was never his intention, but applicability. The only aspects that are coherent enough to be applied to our World are not racial, but folkist. Tolkien was advocating the unification of groups of folk. Note that this is precisely where he ends the core plot of his tale - when the various folk have united within their own nation, which then went on with noble relations with their neighboring folk, and this caused the defeat of their common enemy.

Also, as far as the Gnostic Cross goes, it should be noted that many non-racists, but racialists (a.k.a. folkists), use that symbol in their imagery and it is they who have an accurate understanding of its universalist symbolism.

Final Thoughts
The Aryan elements far outweigh the un-Aryan in The Lord of the Rings films. Even those un-Aryan elements that were introduced as part of the screen adaptation's production were nowhere near powerful enough to subvert Tolkien's themes. I have reviewed many films here, but this trilogy is, without a doubt, vital to authentic Aryanist revolution. Most of the other films that I have looked at only enjoy notice from small, but devoted, fan bases. The Lord of the Rings, however, is known and available worldwide in both its original literary version and in this very faithful film adaptation, which makes it one of the strongest elements that we have active on The Storytelling Front.

The Aryan Kampf in "Lord of the Rings" - Part V

Events and Places
Volume III: The Return of the King

Once again, we pick up right where the previous film left off. The nation of Rohan had achieved victory in the battle at Helm's Deep, which also resulted in Saruman's army being destroyed. In story dynamics, it means that the False Dichotomy had been exposed and one side of it has been put to an end. However, Men are easy to claim victory and settle down after one hard fought battle and it will still take some convincing, a final push, to unite the two nations of Rohan and Gondor.

Frodo and Sam, with Gollum, are getting ever closer to Mordor and this is increasingly allowing for Gollum to be more cunning with his trickery.

The Fall of Saruman and Isengard
The Ents have completely destroyed Saruman's surrounding compound by flooding it with a river from the mountains. The only thing left standing is the tower, Orthanc. In the books this is explained by revealing that Orthanc is actually one great piece of unbreakable stone and the Ents were not able to bring it down. This bit seems to be only implied in the film. However, Saruman has locked himself inside and is at a loss of what to due after suffering such a defeat. Gandalf and company arrive offering Saruman peace if he only tells them what he knows of Sauron's plan. Quite predictably, evil and ego go hand in hand, thus Saruman still thinks he can cause some damage, first by insulting Theoden and by shooting a fireball at Gandalf. This proves folly as Gandalf is now an Arhat. In The Fellowship of the Ring, Saruman easily defeated Gandalf in a wizard duel, but now it is Gandalf who defeats Saruman by breaking his staff with so much as a snap of his fingers.

Grima Wormtongue, Saruman's former agent in Edoras, is here too and Theoden honorably allows Grima to redeem himself and join the forces of good. However, the selfishness of Saruman once again comes out and he scolds his servant for even considering such an option, which in turn angers Grima who jumps at Saruman with a dagger only to be shot down by Legolas, but not before he wounds Saruman who falls from the tower! Quite the quick series of events, but it shows very well how volatile the power-hungry really are, as well as where it often leads them to. The first sequence of this third film is actually an elaboration on the back story of Smeagol/Gollum and it shows how he was, still as a happy little hobbit, fishing with his friend, Deagol, who by chance found the Ring resting on the riverbed. In less than a minute, after the both of them have had a good look at the Ring, they are fighting to kill each other over it; such are the selfish, such are those divided by greed for material possession. In the end, the only winner is the force that initially tore them apart.

With Saruman's final bane the theme of falling can been seen once again. There is even a special tracking shot of Saruman's plunge, much like the previous film did with Gandalf, thus it can readily be identified as a key image and idea. Saruman's fall is also his end; he is impaled on a spoke of a wheel and pulled under water into darkness and death. The spoke wheel can be seen as a metaphorical Gnostic Cross or Sun Wheel. In Slavic mythology, the kołowrót or kolovrat (literally - "spinning wheel" and sometimes Anglicized as collowrath), is a Sun symbol and it comes from the practical tool of the wheel in a well's pulley system, which is course a farmer's tool and thus an Aryan one. The symbol is also sometimes referred to as a Slavic Swastika.

Saruman about to be destroyed by the Sun Wheel

It is this that finally puts an end to Saruman, thus making his death not just physical, but also spiritual. This is a direct opposite to Gandalf who became more physically able and spiritually stronger after his fall and battle with the Balrog. This sequence is also a pretty big deviation from the source material, but that will be covered in Part VI.

Some interesting details here are that Theoden clearly shows to not be under affected by Saruman's voice and magic anymore. This suggests that he is stronger in spirit than before. When Saruman shoots the fireball, the framing of the shot shows the flame swooping down from the top of the symmetrically framed tower, which not only mirrors the power of Sauron's fiery Eye atop Barad-Dur, but also general theme of the Eye of Zion atop the pyramid on the back of the Dollar Bill. The situation is getting dire for the elite at the top, thus they do not just send their golems out anymore, they themselves begin to lash out at those mobilized in revolution.

Return to Edoras and the Next Step
With Edoras saved and the nation of Rohan secure from immediate aggression, the Men do what Gentiles most often do in such a situation - bring out the kegs and mugs and serve ale all around! The Hobbits, of course, join in the celebration. However, Gandalf and Aragorn know that there is still much work to be done. One tower from the False Dichotomy may have fallen, but the other still remains strong. King Theoden has a typically Gentile grudge against Gondor, which he claims didn't answer his own nation's need for help, thus he doesn't have to help Gondor.

Things are also new complications from the fact that Merry, being a curious, but not all that wise, Hobbit, looked into the Palanthir, which was the stone that Saruman had used to communicate with Sauron. This, effectively, gives Sauron a glimpse of what is going on in Edoras as well as make him think that Merry has the Ring of Power. Gandalf leaves with Merry for Minas Tirith, which is the main city in Gondor and that nation borders with Mordor. This will keep Sauron's gaze away from Rohan and closer to his own lands, though unfortunately it puts Gondor on the path of imminent danger.

The Great City of Minas Tirith
Minas Tirith is perhaps the grandest set piece in the entire film trilogy, as well as the location of the most spectacular battles - first the Siege of Gondor, which is almost immediately followed by the Battle of Pelennor Fields.

With its large scope and precise design, the architecture of Minas Tirith is a beacon from an Aryan imagination. The uniform stone design with not one block or corner wasted is what the greatest Roman architect or Albert Speer strived to achieve in one of their projects. Interestingly, Minas Tirith was inspired by a real location that can be visited to this day: Le Mont St-Michel in Normandy, France. This is a key to understanding the very Aryan symbolism of Minas Tirith.

 Aryanism is the Real World and in Fiction

The very top of Le Mont St-Michel is an abbey, while the top of Minas Tirith is the hall of the King of Gondor. This reinforces the Aryan idea of a leader not just being a political leader, but also a spiritual leader - one with a vision and capability for achieving Greatness in his nation. "Le Mont St-Michel" literally means the "The Mount of Saint Michael," referring to the Archangel who struck down the devil with his sword. This can be directly applied to the sword that Aragorn now wields as heir to the throne of Gondor and also to the idea of an Aryan leader being both militarist and spiritual - in effect, being rendition of a warrior angel like Saint Michael. Aragorn will slowly rise to an image very much like this and in the final battle even wears a cape that can be seen as resembling angel wings. The soldiers of Gondor also have wings in the designs of their helmets, they are wrapped around either side.

As Gandalf first rides up to the King's Hall, there is a good view of the courtyard at the top of Minas Tirith, which is basically one big Gnostic Cross. The two statues here also have wings on their helmets, though these actually stick out and this just makes the warrior angel symbolism all the more apparent.

The Final Key to the Grand Alliance
The leadership of Minas Tirith has, like so many other things, been divided. Currently, it is Denethor who sits on the throne, but he is just the Steward, which is a post that perhaps can be best described as "first officer to the King." An important position, one that takes on full leadership responsibilities in the King's absence, but ultimately the Steward is not the top leader. Denethor knows this and has been corrupted by the power that he was entrusted with. Perhaps this comes at no surpise, since Denethor is father of Boromir who also fell to the power of the Ring. There is no direct indicator that Denethor is being manipulated by Sauron, but there is much that suggests that he is in fact under a spell.

First, he is acting horribly irresponsibly in his post. Even if he was a selfish leader who was only interested in saving his own skin, he wouldn't just sit around waiting for his city to be pillaged. Second, we first see him slumped in his throne grieving over the death of Boromir whose broken horn he holds. This is where the theme of duality comes into play. Denethor is effectively the mirror image of Theoden who was also under a spell in his throne. Now, there is no parasitic agent manipulating Denethor, but Grima the traitor wasn't the source of the spell on Theoden, it was Saruman, who was in the bordering territory of Isengard, up in his tower working the magic. Who do we have next to Gondor? Why, it's Sauron himself as Mordor borders with Gondor. Surely, Sauron is a much more powerful spell-maker than Saruman, thus doesn't need a petty agent nudging his puppet along. He can just put his targeted leader into an irrational state of grievance, stirred from the death of a dead son, and have thus have him be an impotent leader for just long enough as an army of orcs marches over from Mordor. The maddened Denethor even refuses to call for aid from Rohan and he is even more stubborn about Gondor-Rohan relations than Theoden was seen to be. Thus, Gandalf must step into action - he has Merry light the beacons signaling Rohan for help and then he himself rallies the soldiers of Gondor right after Denethor had lost his mind and ordered a pointless retreat. The weak and overcome Denethor eventually goes mad and tries to burn his one living son alive, but ends up burning himself and falling (another key fall in the storyline) from the top of his own city.

Theoden, who has shown to be tougher in spirit, rises to the call of duty and answers the message from the beacons. Thus, the much needed alliance is finally settled, but Rohan needs to muster enough military power to smite Mordor's forces. After two days of calling all able men to arms, Theoden and company know that they do not have nearly as much soldiers as they hoped, but they ride into battle anyway. In doing so, they effectively ensure that what Sauron fears most, men uniting with one common purpose, not only happens, but those men then ride battle ready right up to Sauron's doorstep to put an end to all of his deception.

The Importance of the Oath
While Rohan's army rides on into battle with militarist perseverance, Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli, have gone into the depths of an old mountain. They are looking for an old army, long since dead, but cursed and trapped in stone for abandoning their former master Isildur in battle. As Isildur's heir, and now with his ancestor's sword, Aragorn ihas the chance to get these ghosts to fight, which will provide a winning chance for the Alliance, as well as allowing old tortured souls finally be at peace.

The Army of Dead has some interesting symbolism around it. In effect, they are living beings forced into stone. The mountain that they inhabit is said to be "evil" and has this particular aura around it, not a visible one, but one in the metaphysical sense. It is no ordinary mountain and for all intents and purposes, it should not be this way. This idea of having a life force trapped in stone is representative of the golem theme that we have with the orcs. The orcs are artificial beings forced into a certain existence, which is a condition akin to the men trapped in the stone mountain. The key difference is that the golems have been made by evil to serve evil, while the men were formerly good and have been punished for a great misdeed - reduced down to an artificial state of being until they fulfill their oath.

In essence, Aragorn asks the Army of Dead:

"Is Your Honor Loyalty?"

Their rising up to the call of duty, which results in them being free from their torment in death, is also what Boromir went through, albeit over the course of minutes not millennia! Like the Army of Dead, Boromir gave his word to fulfill a task, but was overcome by the Ring and effectively abandoned his duty. However, he realized this an snapped out of the spell and saved Merry and Pippin in battle, but received mortal wounds in doing so. However, he passed on in honor. The Army of Dead, too abandoned their duty long ago, but now snap out of their spell, leave the confinement of stone (un-become golems by their own will), and go to fight for their former master's heir. The theme here is a return to honor and it can also be seen in the line of Denethor (father), Boromir (first son), and Faramir (younger son) - Denethor succumbed to madness from being under spell and died in shame; Boromir fell under a spell, but snapped out of it, and died with honor; Faramir was tempted, but never succumbed, and goes on to live in honor.

So as we can see, the Kampf to overcome the spell of Sauron is also a whole lot of inner-revolutions by individuals as well as the Grand Alliance of Nations and Folk against him. Each member, down to the individual soldier, faces his own inner battle with spirit, in many instances even when already wielding a sword against Sauron. For many may fight, but only the Noble, the Aryans, fight by motivations from a profound spiritual insight as to what they're doing and why - that is the essence of Kampf.

The Trek into Mordor
Frodo and Sam, with Gollum, who have steadily been making their way to Mordor, have finally reached that feared place. Much like with the others facing their toughest challenge, they now face theirs. Climbing up a hidden set of stairs as indicated by Gollum, they are nearing a way past the massive mountain walls of Mordor - a certain tunnel and Gollum seems to have some particular plans brewing with this place. Gollum has been slyly working to get Frodo to resent Sam and to making Frodo suspect that his friend is trying to betray him. This takes its final step during a rest along the steps during which Gollum sets up a situation to make it look like Sam has been stealing bread. Sam, who Gollum knows is frustrated with him, lashes out at Gollum who plays the pathetic, innocent victim. The ruse, of which this is the last step, finally works - Frodo tells Sam to leave on the pretense that the trip is taking its toll on him and that he is hindering progress.

Frodo is, of course, thoroughly convinced that he did the right thing and this is because he did it from his own will - this is the key to Judaic manipulation. It is not the manipulating of the pawns to get them to move where the puppet master wants, it is the manipulating of the playing field so that he pawns move by their own will where the puppet master wants, thus giving the illusion of free choice. The Zionist chessboard isn't literal, it's metaphorical - it is more like The Matrix or the alien infestation in They Live. Due to his madness which was accentuated by the loss of his son, Denethor was absolutely convinced that he was doing the right thing. As was Isildur when he tried to control the Ring. The spell was on their minds. Gollum has just orchestrated such a situation with Frodo and Sam and tore two friends apart - the unimportant one is out of the way, while the one with the Ring is walking into a trap. There is no need to snatch the Ring, there is just the need to get Frodo to drop it.

Sam had had been honest throughout the entire journey and soon sees proof of the ploy that had been played; he promptly rushes back up to help his friend. Frodo on the other hand sees that the tunnel is not just any old tunnel, but actually a lair of a giant spider-beast, Shelob. He just barely makes it out of there when Gollum reappears and now just flat out tries to take the Ring in angry frustration that his plan of having Frodo eaten by Shelob didn't work. Frodo has taken a heavy toll mentally and physically and still doesn't fully see what Gollum is doing, or starts to pity him once again after another pathetic "victim" excuse. However, when Gollum leaps at him again, Frodo manages to roll him off of a cliff... this is actually a bit of luck and Frodo's full commitment to destroying the Ring is still to be tested.

Shelob comes out of her lair and sneaks up Frodo stinging him as he looks where to go. Luckliy, Sam shows up and fights the beast off with Frodo's sword, but also with the vial of light, the Light of the Star Elendil. The theme of light is present throughout the whole storyline and all golems in the Lord of the Rings despise natural light, but especially sunlight. It is no surpirse that the Swastika, a Sun symbol, is looked at with disgust by Zionist pests.

Frodo is not dead after being stung, but rather just completely limp for a few hours, as Sam overhears some orcs talking, but they take Frodo to their fortress, Cirith Ungol. Sam has much of his work cut out for him, as the garrison at the fort begins to fight after an argument breaks out over Frodo's shiny armor. This would have been a pretty lame plot device, since it makes Sam's rescue of Frodo much easier, but as we have seen: orcs are very volatile in temper and spiritually weak beings succumb to materialism quicker. Thus, it is no surprise that something so small sets some orcs off in a brawl, and no surpise that the whole garrison joins in.

Thematically, this is also very consistent. The essence of Sauron's power, symbolic of usury based power, is highly unstable and demands constant manipulations to keep afloat. Also, the orcs/golems are the dynamic opposite of the members that set out on the Kampf against Sauron. Thus, the golems fight without purpose or for whatever little reason they feel like fighting over in a brawl of disunity - while the Noble Warriors on the Kampf fight for a very specific purpose and are united because of it.

The Final Tasks
Theoden's Riders arrived and helped break the siege at Minas Tirith, while Aragorn showed up shortly thereafter with his Army of Dead and helped take down the Men of the South and the Corsairs, allies of Sauron. Interestingly, those particular groups were said to be mercenaries, or soldiers for hire, and thus another version that stands opposite of the Noble Warriors. That makes for three types of motivation to be found in the groups on the battlefield - Noble Warriors motivated by Kampf; Mercenaries driven by promise of gold; and Orcs, brainless golems just doing what they're told - the "anti-purpose."

After defeating all in the battlefield the next decision is the key Final Task for the Alliance of Middle Earth Folk - to meet Sauron's remaining forces by the Black Gate so that Mordor is empty and Frodo can destroy the Ring in Mount Doom. They set out from Minas Tirith.

The success now depends on Frodo who must accomplish his Final Task - destroying the Ring. Note that the final changes that take place physically are in conjunction with changes that take place metaphysically. Gimli who had been stubborn about allying with Men and Elves, went on to accept this, but still poked fun at the fact, as did Legolas. In the Battle of Pelennor Fields, as in Helm's Deep, they were competing to see who can kill the most orcs and Gimli would say "may the best Dwarf win!" Then he got jealous that Legolas managed to take down an entire War Oliphant, complete with crew, single-handedly. As they stand by the Black Gate and watch a massive orc army pour out, Gimli makes yet another remark in the same vein, but Legolas quickly responds and a profound realization sets in.

Gimli: "Never thought I'd die fighting side by side with an Elf."

Legolas: "What about side by side with a friend?"

Gimli: "Aye. I could do that."

That is the essence of camaraderie, which all warriors in a Kampf must come to realize, and in Lord of the Rings, they do. They form a diverse army, comprised of members from every Folk in Middle Earth, to smite their common enemy who has been ever manipulating and causing turmoil for everyone. This multi-ethnic alliance, to many peoples’ surprise, actually has precedent in the real World - that would be the real-life military unit that was as ethnically diverse as a World Map - The Waffen SS.

SS Mittelerde - Dwarf, Human, Elf, Wizard

and Hobbit (the helmet by Gandalf... lol)

Meanwhile...
Frodo approaches Mount Doom and stands at the edge of the grand foundry where the Ring was made. Gollum had reappeared just before he and Sam went in, but Sam managed to hold him off to allow Frodo time to toss the Ring in. However, this final moment, the Final Task, is one of will. Just like for Aragorn and the Alliance of Middle Earth, the hard part was not marching up to the gate and drawing swords, it was getting themselves to do it and then standing ground as they see the orcs pour out. Likewise, for Frodo, a simple toss is not the hard part, but the building up the will to make the toss. It is breaking out of the mind prison set up by Sauron, to any wearer the Ring appears as the most “precious” thing in existence, just like facing Sauron’s army appears as the most hopeless thing in existence - it is all part of Sauron’s spell to ensure his preservation - it is the engineering of the playing field to get pawns to go where he wants them to be and do what he demands of them. And so Frodo... puts on the Ring... immediately Sauron senses this and sends the Nazgul after him.

Gollum, long since completely overcome by his lust for the Ring, will never stop in trying to get it and attacks Frodo, after seeing his footprints, and bites of his finger, which finally puts him in possession of “the Precious.” The next scene is key since it shows that Frodo finally stands up to the task and overcomes Sauron's illusion. Just outside of Shelob’s lair, he had a bit of luck with rolling Gollum off of a cliff, but here actually does it intentionally and Gollum plunges down into the molten rock. Note the shot - it is tracking shot of not just a character falling, but also of the Ring. There is one more key fall, the final one, and it occurs right after the Ring lands in the volcanic river.

The floating Ring is soon consumed by the molten flow, it is pulled under the surface of Middle Earth never to return; this causes the tower of Barad-Dur to crumble and the Eye of Sauron to topple from its peak and burst, rifting the earth in a great shockwave and pulling down all of the parasitic creations deep into the bowels of Baphomet’s Hell.

Frodo and Sam manage to escape the erupting Mount Doom, but get stranded on the slope as lava streams surround them. It all seems hopeless, but then Gandalf shows up with a flight of eagles and both Frodo and Sam are taken by an eagle in its mighty, yet in this case also gentle, talon. It is certainly an interesting image and it is no coincidence that it bears striking compositional resemblance to the Luftwaffe insignia that can be seen in this blog's banner - the eagle is holding the source of salvation which has brought about a New Order.

The New Age and The New Order
A New Age of Unity and Nobility then settles peacefully onto Middle Earth. Aragorn’s final monologue at his coronation on the Gnostic Cross Courtyard of Minas Tirith effectively says: “Let there be Unity through Nobility.” The original Fellowship is still together in friendship and lasting mutual respect. The lands of Men can be seen as soon to be fully united as Faramir and Eowyn - a Son of Gondor and a Daughter of Rohan - have taken romantic interest in one another.

In The Two Towers there is a brief scene where Aragorn’s ancestry is mentioned, and the nation that he belonged to, as well as its dispersal, which reflects what happened to the Aryans in our real World - scattered with the occasional rising up throughout history. However, in this highly romanticized tale, the Aryan doesn’t just rise up and accomplish some feat, he actually ensures the setting up of a kingdom founded on Aryan ideals. This is made all the more clear with the arrival of Arwen right after Aragorn’s coronation. She is an immortal Elf, but chooses a mortal life with purpose, over an immortal life that’s empty. By staying in Middle Earth and taking Aragorn’s hand, she also effectively ensures that the new King will have an heir, thus she is actually playing a very key (though totally off screen!) role in the well-being of the nation of Gondor.

There is still some ground to cover with Lord of the Rings and that will be wrapped up in the concluding chapter.

PART VI

The Aryan Kampf in "Lord of the Rings" - Part IV

Events and Places
Volume II: The Two Towers

The story picks up right where the previous installment left off. The Fellowship had been separated by the Falls of Rauros and now three parties push on with the Grand Task. I have said that the Fellowship wasn't really "broken" (as the chapter title seems to suggest), but that it is still intact and it is just different duties that sent the members in different directions. This idea is confirmed by the Extended Edition DVD, which includes a map of the Fellowship's trek on the box art. The map on the first film's DVD box shows the Fellowship's path from the Shire and to the Falls of Rauros, thus the Fellowship was formed much earlier than it was formalized by Elrond, simply new members joined the mission. In the box art to The Two Towers, there is also a map, but now with three paths - that of Frodo and Sam; that of Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli; and that of Merry and Pippin, who go through a similar change that their two Shire kin have already begun to experience.

Frodo and Sam's Journey
The first of three major plot lines in the film. Frodo and Sam are traveling through a chain of mountains and the journey is starting to take a heavy toll on Frodo. First, he has a nightmare about Gandalf's fall from the Bridge of Kazad-Dum in Moria. Second, the weight of the Ring is making him ever weary and seems to be altering his body. Sam notices that Frodo is eating and sleeping very little, thus it must be the Ring that is somehow driving him and this condition of being artificially alive are the first steps that led to Smeagol's degradation into the Gollum.

Gollum is also introduced as a character here - previously he had just been an ominous background stalker as seen in The Fellowship of the Ring. Frodo connects with Gollum in a way and he seems to at least partly understand Gollum's condition, since he himself is going through what Gollum went through years and years ago. Sam, on the other hand, is very wary of Gollum and suspects him to be pulling a two-faced trick so that he can get his hands on the Ring, which he repeatedly calls "the Precious." Gollum may be just a goy of Sauron, though he is a clever goy and promptly begins to use the Dark Lord's favorite tactic of divide and conquer. Gollum knows that he cannot overpower both Hobbits at the same time, especially since Sam is not falling for his charade, so he starts to sow discord between the two Hobbits. This is subtle at first, such as calling Frodo "Master" and belittling Sam as "the fat Hobbit," which, in effect, places them on opposite ends of a forced dichotomy - one is held in esteem, the other in disgust. Through constant repetition, this mindset of Gollum's begins to settle into the minds of Frodo and Sam and the seeds of conflict start to sprout. The first argument that the two of them have is after being with the Gollum for a few days, yet they were best of friends before. Thus, this new found callousness they have towards each other (though mainly Frodo towards Sam) must have been subversively introduced - first by the Ring and then further stirred by Gollum, which is basically just the same process as both serve the Dark Lord.

Gollum's inner conflict is also a mirror of Frodo and Sam's brewing conflict. The theme of duality seems to be very pervasive in Lord of the Rings, and due to the great length and scope of the work, Tolkien was able to demonstrate not just a great many possibilities, but their opposites as well -- Boromir and Faramir; Saruman and Gandalf; Denethor (whom we still have to meet) and Theoden; Gollum/Smeagol and Frodo & Sam. In all instances, one side is seduced by evil, while the other rises up to the call of duty, note that this does not always mean survival.

The destructive efficiency of evil hopes that by making one side fall, the other side will be pulled down trying to save it. This image of a forced dichotomy that is engineered to destroy is the main theme of this chapter and the first great task of the Fellowship is to counter it.

Dichotomy of the Two Towers
There are two literal towers in the film, Orthanc in Isengard and Barad-Dur in Mordor. These titular towers represent the Grand False Dichotomy that the Dark Lord is using to divide the nations of Middle Earth, but mainly the two nations of men - Rohan and Gondor. This image can be directly applied to the real World Cold War that was in full swing when Lord of the Rings was first published with the two towers being Washington DC and Moscow, or Capitalism and Communism, or NATO and the Warsaw Pact, etc... However, this idea of subversive divide to pave the way for easier conquest and control is nothing new and a well versed scholar like JRR Tolkien was certainly well aware of this fact. To this day we have people arguing over left and right in countless forms be they social, political or even in the fields of science. The point is that it very effectively negates the objectivity and focus that unity requires and thus Gentiles remain repressed. It is a grand irony that this unfortunate condition is largely due to their own doing, but that is what makes it so hard to combat - it requires the swallowing of one's own pride (something not easily done) and realizing that you've been fooled by an illusion.

This is by an large what the puppet master Sauron is counting on, that capable Men are unable to swallow their pride and sacrifice for their neighbor with whom they have a grudge or in whom they see some arbitrary difference, be it political, social, cultural, or national - or even simply geographical. Conquest of spirit precedes conquest by sword.

The Light of Arya begins to expose to the False Dichotomy

Gandalf's Journey
A longer version of Gandalf's great fall from the broken bridge of Kazad-Dum is the opening sequence of the film. Despite already being very deep underground, Gandalf and the Balrog seem to fall into a pitch black abyss and in this sequence we see that it is actually quite deep, they fall and even fight while still falling and falling...

This could be explained by the fact that they actually weren't that deep underground, but near the foot of mountain as the surrounding landscape seems to show. However, a literal and physical explanation will come to another dead end: when Gandalf tells Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli of his fall, he says that he eventually defeated the Balrog while up on what can only be the peak of a great mountain. How did he fall so far and wind up on an alpine summit? The explanation, therefore, must be metaphysical and/or spiritual. This would also explain why Gandalf is still alive after such a strenuous feat as well as why he seems to be endowed with not just new powers, but effectively a new life - Gandalf has ascended to Arhat. The fall down to the depths of Middle Earth and the final fight up on a freezing peak is him triumphing over all levels of his natural condition - both in spirit and in body. Each member of the Fellowship is on the same kind of metaphysical journey in conjunction with their mission.

Edoras
Edoras is the main city of Rohan, which is one of two nations of Men in Middle Earth. An alliance between these nations is key for Sauron to be defeated. The Dark Lord knows this all too well and has used his puppet Saruman to forge an army of elite orcs in order to destroy Rohan. Saruman is also up to tricks of his own and has divided the leadership of Rohan and effectively made it powerless and subversively guided by him. King Theoden of Rohan is under Saruman's spell and the King's advisor Grima Wormtongue has been bought out by Saruman and thus maliciously advises the King. When Eomer, the King's own nephew, warns his uncle of the coming danger from orcs, Grima accuses Eomer of being a warmonger and has him banished from Edoras, after getting Theoden to sign an "official order." Grima Wormtongue is a very apt name for this character and as with many names in the whole work, it is no mistake.

The Parasitic Advisor with the Puppet

This image can be directly applied to real World Jewish subversion of national leaderships. The United States government is a perfect example and it doesn't take very much research to see that while the US President is (and always has) been a Gentile, the amount of Zionist Jews in the Presidential Cabinet has been ever increasing. This allows the subversive agents to be very influential with a direct link to national leadership (right at its side and whispering into its ear), while also being able to take zero responsibility for any failures of their puppet since they didn't "officially" make the decision - they merely "advised" and "suggested." This allows them to place a weak leader in order to attempt to execute a strong (and possibly even noble) plan, but the inability of the leader will be ignored upon the inevitable and calculated failure upon which it will be the plan, not the leader, that will be labeled as "ineffective." Next, very quickly, the opposite plan will be implemented, which was the scheme all along. The other possible subversive course is if a leader gets too near a controversy of some sort (often even this can be engineered as well), he can be promptly removed and a new puppet, one ready to listen or take the fall, can be then installed. The overall point is that while leadership constantly changes, the parasitic agents always remain. And the masses still wonder why change hasn't come as initially (and repeatedly) "promised."

Consider the motto of the Israeli Mossad: "Where there is no guidance, a nation falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety." The subversive factor is that these "counselors" are actually placed in foreign nations; they are the parasitic advisors who funnel an able nation's resources to the Jews. The United States gives Israel a large, yearly, and unconditonal sum of money, military equipment, and aid. This is the real World's biggest example of "guidance" and "counselors" which via secrecy and brainwashing is kept from the American public. However, there are some who are well aware of this.

Grima's mission is to ensure that division and indecision keeps Rohan in a weak and disorganized status quo with everyone hesitant about what to do and how to do it. Gandalf, now as Arhat, easily sees through this charade and quickly reveals the real nature of this corner of the chessboard. Grima, confronted with reality and unmasked, flees in shame without any of the prizes that were promised him. King Theoden is tempted to strike Grima down, but is held back by Aragorn and promptly realizes that impulsive reactions cannot be the solution to their present situation. So, King Theoden was not only freed from his mind prison and reverted back to his normal human state, but also has begun to act more nobly, thus is taking his own small, but sure, steps out of the ignobility that plagues the men of Middle Earth.

When pulling Theoden out of Saruman's spell Gandalf says a very interesting line to describe the situation, "like poison from a wound." This applies directly to the method Zionist subversion, which secretly frightens its puppets with some infliction of false flag terror and then claims to have all the remedies, which are then implemented by parasitic advisors. However, it is those elements that are the poison, the "spell," which then keeps the puppet under appropriate control. Gandalf snaps Theoden out of just such a condition.

The Noble Advisor with the Leader

Gandalf then advises King Theodon on the best course of action and this is, no surprise here, a militarist plan - the Folk of Rohan are to set aside their differences with the Folk of Gondor and meet their shared enemy in battle.

An interesting visual detail, which can be seen in the screen shot above, is that there is a Gnostic Cross in the design of the throne and it is right by the King's head when he is sitting up straight. However, when he was under Saruman's spell, Theodeon was slumped and slightly angled away from the Cross and towards the traitor Grima.

The Battle of Helm's Deep
This is an interesting development in the story since going to Helm's Deep seems to contradict Gandalf's advice of militarist action. However, due to Gandalf not really protesting the decision all that much, but in fact going along with it, the decision and motivations behind it are militarist and they certainly achieve such results.

The Battle of Helm's Deep will later be seen as a mirror of the final battle by the Black Gate of Mordor. At Helm's Deep, evil marches to confront good, while later at the Black Gate, good will go to confront evil. The overall strategy of this move is also a dynamic opposite to Sauron's strategy of divide and conquer. By hiding in the defensible position of Helm's Deep, Theoden evens out the odds of facing Saruman's great army of orcs, but also, in effect, denies cooperation between Saruman's army and Sauron's army. The move comes at a heavy cost and many lives are lost, but it seems men just can't help but using the enemies' weapons against them! Though, the weapon here was the general strategic move, a counter move to be more precise, thus Theoden did not succumb to the power of the Ring or sellout his honor in any way. The members of the Fellowship may have felt somewhat aggravated by Theoden not doing things exactly as they imagined, but they realized that Theoden is a sovereign leader and must be allowed to enact his own leadership in his own lands. The victory at Helm's Deep was a tough one to achieve, but it effectively united Rohan and destroyed a key part of the False Dichotomy set up by Sauron - Isengard's army is annihilated.

A strange, and seemingly out of place, event in the battle is when the orcs breach the fortress's outer wall with some powerful explosives, which they placed at its base in a key weak point - a drain. These bombs are set off in a suicide run by a torch bearing orc and the most frustrating part of this scene is that Legolas fails to bring him down despite launching two arrows. This is the only time Legolas misses and it's twice in a row. However, this is not so much of a plot point and an excuse to show a big explosion as it is a reflection on how the Dark Forces in the story work. The orcs' initial mass storming of the wall served as a cover to plant the bombs; Aragorn and Legolas realized too late what is going on and the mines were detonated. This progression by deception is exactly what Sauron is doing and him getting ahold of the Ring would be just like the bombs going off here - only the swarm unleashed then wouldn't even be winnable in a pyrrhic victory for the Good in Middle Earth.

The end of the battle at Helm's Deep has some interesting symbolism. Gandalf rides down a giant slope with Rohan's Cavalry and the rising Sun, the light of the Swastika, blinds the orcs/golems and they are decimated with the scattered remaining ranks fleeing into the nearby Fangorn Forest where the living trees finish them for good.

The triumphant army of Rohan, which now includes Eomer and his Riders, is set to be part of the overall Kampf against the Dark Lord Sauron.

Ents and the Battle of Isengard
The Ents are an interesting addition to the story and the third of major plot lines in The Two Towers. This plot is the one with Merry and Pippin who were kidnapped at the end of the last film and Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli set out after them. However, they met Gandalf who told of his fight with the Balrog and assured the Fellowship members that the Hobbits are safe.

Merry and Pippin escape during a fight at the orc camp, Eomer and his Riders ambushed the Uruk-Hai, and the two little Hobbits fled to the nearby wood. There they found out that the trees are not just alive... but alive and moving! These tree beings are then Ents who safeguard and care for the forest. As a metaphor, this is directly applicable to the Aryan notion of the unity of all things under the Sun, as symbolized by the Swastika or any other of the many Sun symbols, which all derive from the Aryan Swastika. In brief, the trees join the Kampf! This plotline also shows that Merry and Pippin are maturing as warriors and, in fact, are on their own respective journeys of ascent out of their natural Hobbit condition. Each one has a role in getting the Ents to rally against Saruman. Much like Men, the Ents rise up to the call of duty after being shown the destructive possibilities of the Dark Lord's plan; the Ents see that Saruman has destroyed much of their forest to fuel his industrial forges and create his army.

With this sight, the Ents see that they must spring into action and march on Isengard. The ensuing battle has more Aryan symbolism as the golem foundries fueled by artificial fires are flooded with a great river that Saruman had blocked to allow his industry to expand. This is an image of natural life overcoming the artificial - water snuffs the foundries and the Ents smash the orcs - the trees shatter the golems.

An interesting visual detail here is that the walled compound that is now at the center of Isengard, and the one that the Ents flood and destroy, has six sections as can be seen below - three diameters in a circle means it has been partitioned into six parts. Thus, a six-pointed icon that has been forcibly scorched into the face of Middle Earth is destroyed in this battle.

Divinity drowns the Demonic

The Kampf Continues
One side of the False and Forced Dichotomy has been destroyed, however, the struggle is far from over. In the ruins of the city of Osigiliath, Faramir realizes that he cannot bring the Ring to his father, Denethor, even though he is very anxious to please his father who doesn't seem to appreciate his efforts. This is a very important step and the defining moment between Boromir and Faramir - both were faced with the same choice and both chose differently and thus wound up on very different paths.

Interesting is that Osigiliath, a destroyed city, resembles the halls of Moria, which is no surprise as both fell to the same plague. Frodo and Sam left Moria in despair, but now they press on in their journey with a new found hope, which Sam describes in a monologue. "Some things are worth fighting for" - he is basically talking about Aryan ideals of civilization. Gollum also has a final monologue, with himself, and he continues his scheme of trying get his hands on the Ring. He even seems to suggest that he wants to keep it for himself and not give it Sauron, which reflects his true nature of serving only himself, which is a trait that ultimately even Sauron possesses.

Next, the Kampf will go on to its two greatest tasks - facing Sauron's Army in battle, which will require the alliance of Gondor; and the destroying of the Ring, which will require entering Mordor.

PART V