Showing posts with label information. Show all posts
Showing posts with label information. Show all posts

January 13, 2011

Observations Around Society

Popular culture is in a pretty low state these days. Western culture has become driven by promise of plenty via little to no effort. Indulgence has become a good thing, as long as a worker doesn't neglect their responsibilities more than the relativist boss allows; this inevitably leads to cutting corners in effort all the while expecting more in return for the work performed. These indulgent desires spill over even more in social life as I have seen during my socially bizarre journey through college. Instead of discussing things like literature, history, politics, our studies or anything mentally stimulating, the point of social activity was inebriation in its highly limited number of forms. By now it has gone so far that most people take these absurdities as normal. It is a dangerous mix of decadence and accepting an overarching fate.

Gizmos are also a big thing today - a small portable phone with a camera and internet access is, by today's standards, simply a "cell phone." Added to the fact that most of these devices even have a multitude of "applications." One of these "apps" (people don't even say whole words these days) was called "The Lightsaber Application" and the whole thing was a simple display of the famous Star Wars prop that made the associated sounds as you move the phone around. Pointless - a goy bisciut - but people go nuts for these things.

My cell phone camera, which has spent a great deal of time being perfectly useless, or one could say "dormant," up until fairly recently when I decided to put it to use by noting several observations around society.

PHOTO 1
This appears to be an ad for the fast food chain McDonald's that tries to tap into the "more is better" craze. The man looks sad that he is only getting a small chocolate dessert with water, instead of a gargantuan portion of culinary chemistry in both solid and liquid form.


On slightly closer inspection you can see that it is actually a satire on McDonald's. Note the smaller print (click image for larger version) that outlines the dangers of consuming fast food, yet it does it within the confines of the ad, which grinds not only against McDonald's, but also against the elusive quality of corporate advertising. It also looks like the text of "possible side effects" that prescription medicine commercials have: while showing happy people the narrator quickly reads off a list of possible side effects and if written out, they may very well be as long that the ones listed here.

PHOTO 2
Next we have a joke about the absurdity of too much free choice or uninformed free choice.


This is part of the whole "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" debate. The details of said debate are beyond the scope of this essay, but it is worth noting that absurdity is gripping an ever firmer hold on our society. The obsession of "rights" and "free choice" is one such thing as this cartoon demonstrates. Citizens of an Aryan State do not have "certain inalienable rights" as the whole concept of "right" is un-Aryan. Rather, citizens of an Aryan State have certain unassigned, yet always active, duties. Ensuring that the younger generation has plenty of chances to bloom with a solid education is one of them. When that is done with rationalism, the younger generation will have much free choice and, critically, their options will not be as ridiculous as the ones pictured above. The Historic Aryan Farmer lets his crops grow as they please, but first ensures the soil is fertile for them to do so.

PHOTO 3
A humorous take on the Arizona immigration issue. There is an NS joke in there, but I think that only reinforces a truth that most Americans are not aware of (due to corrupt education) or one that they just simply deny.

The power of an astute message is awesome.

PHOTO 4

A political cartoon that shows the nature of Judaic selfishness.


The black splotch over the Goldman-Sachs banksters looks like a simple space-filler for the composition, but to me it looks like a monstrous belch of pollution and it appropriately radiates from Lloyd Blankfein's rotten corpus.

PHOTO 5
This is largely self-explanatory.


It is also largely true. Click to read text in larger version.

PHOTO 6
Very interesting image here. Look carefully.


Some very interesting details here. First off, Adolf Hitler, apparently, wasn't the worst tyrant of them all. The death tally attributed to each of these leaders has drifted to and fro and varied from source to source, but this only points out the quality of the mainstream. I have seen 20 million next to Stalin before. For Mao, this is quite low as I have usually seen him "awarded" with 50 to 70 million. However, the 15 million by Hitler is quite strange. The official "holocaust" narrative comes to a total of 6 million. The total dead during WW2 is commonly said to be 50 million, and Hitler has been blamed for starting the war, so why not just make him the worst of the three leaders here? Probably, because that is so ridiculous that it cannot even make it into the mainstream. Thus, Hitler is left with just 6 million, but then he would look fairly tame next to the others, so the cartoonist just multiplied by... er, 2.5... yeah.

What is also interesting is the shape of each head. Note the roughly pyramid shape, which could possibly refer to the "evil power pyramid" as seen on the back of the US Dollar Bill. Each leader's two eyes would be below the ominous all seeing eye at the pyramid's apex. As they are drawn this "third eye" seems to be in their brains - evil men thinking up evil schemes. Stanley Kubrick would approve of this view and showed many ominously themed pyramid compositions (particularly in A Clockwork Orange) and also equated the NS movement to absolute evil (even in the same movie).

Though, as we have seen, the false images are such cartoons.

NOW BEST FOR LAST

PHOTO 7

There was a large tack board that I passed one day and saw a very interesting detail. The frame of the board was lined with 4 identical strips that has a design of various international flags. Coincidentally (or perhaps not) the German flag and the Israeli flag were next to one another. There was also a tiny and precise bit of vandalism that was quite consistent. The top strip was covered with announcements and photos, thus mostly obscured. However, the other three were very visible. I photographed a detail from each of those. Click image for larger version.

Ownage!

This was in the halls of a New York university and there are many Arabic students enrolled at this school who no doubt have expressed their feelings on a certain illegally occupied territory that is administered by criminals guilty of mass murder and actual blood libel.

Society, there is much in the details.

January 11, 2011

The Boromirs Among Us: Occidental Observer

Response to this 12/26/2010 article by Edmund Connelly in The Occidental Observer.

Connelly makes some accurate observations about Zionist crime that is intrinsically tied to the supremacist and hate perpetuating ideology of Judaism, but his article is only a brushing on the dirty surface and not an exposing of the rotten core.

Connelly begins by clearly pointing out that the United States should in no way consider Israel an allied nation and names the Lavon Affair (with a link to the Wikipedia article, nonetheless) as the reason. From reading about such an event we can assume that most truly inquisitive readers (as are those who veer away from mainstream information) will then go on to see that the Lavon Affair was but the start of an era of hidden Israeli aggression against the United States and the West.

Connelly then suggests that there is actually a far more constant and far more subtle war going on and that is one of "laying the mental threads." Citing several example of documentary works that have investigated the portrayal of Arabs (and all Muslims, really) in film, as well as referring to the 1998 movie The Siege, which is likely a part of this grand anti-Arab propaganda campaign, Connelly makes his point that Hollywood is actually a "Jewish fiefdom" that is working to manipulate all Americans into hating Arabs and Muslims.

Now, is Connelly genuinely concerned about the racism that is directed at these people? One would think so, but unfortunately Connelly then fumbles with the following contradiction:

"The issue is not really whether these images have a substantial element of truth. Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet these days to be terrorists."

And so, Connelly has not only spotted racist propaganda, but he has also eaten his fair share - he bought it hook, line and sinker!

First off, Connelly is going by the ZC prescribed definition of terrorist, which essentially means "angry looking Muslim." If we look at the word "terrorist" with a bit of rationalism we can come to the simple conclusion that a "terrorist" is simply someone who frightens people. Fear of death is the most effective way to do this, thus they result to displays of large-scale violence and make sure that those casualty figures are well publicized. This definition fits a whole lot better with the Israeli Defense Forces than it does with a group of rebels who launch flimsy homemade rockets at their oppressors that have starved and occupied them since 1948. However, those oppressive criminals have a well oiled PR machine and media backing them up and shifting blame, thus Connelly should have said: "Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet to be shown as terrorists." This is the Zionists' most effective weapon of mass destruction.

Connelly seems to, more or less, acknowledge this fact in the article when he shows the 2008 film Taken and the popular television show 24 to be nothing more than Jewish manipulations to get Westerners to hate Muslims. This is, by and large, true: Taken had a Jewish screenwriter and 24, a Jewish producer. They were just doing their part to get Westerners to despise Muslims. So, Connelly is back to pointing out Jewish crimes and he even points out the sly inversion presented in Taken: the slave trade is actually more of a Jewish crime, than it is a Muslim one. He uses this story from the Jerusalem Post to point out a key aspect of Jewish racist double-standard: in Israel, slavery is legal if it involves non-Jews. The main victims are young Slavic women who are conned into going to Israel with bogus job prospects. Connelly also mentions that Jews, a disproportionately influential minority, seem to not mention themselves in the movies and stories that they produce.

Connelly then ends his article with a bit of xenophobia by saying that the film Taken "provides a useful function by again alerting Americans, French, and other Westerners to the risk posed by the presence of alien elements amongst us." He is back to buying the propaganda that the Jew never ceases to sell. Oddly, in the same paragraph he seems to scold many of the aforementioned Westerners for "worshipping" Jews and Israel.

In the end, Connelly's article is an uncoordinated blast off into the general right direction - he recognizes his enemy, but doesn't realize many of his potential allies. He also doesn't attack the core of Jewish thinking, but rather just presents empirical observations about how Jews manipulate the world - that fact that he doesn't attack Jewry on ideological ground is his article's great fault. Added to the fact is that he is, in effect, using Jewry's methods against Jewry, thus will never really change anything. Things are doomed to forever be done in the immoral and nefarious Talmudic way unless those very methods are destroyed.


Connelly is a fine example of the Boromir Syndrome - "Let's use the enemy's weapon against him!" That's like saying you don't agree with Israelite usury and then round up all your friends so as to out-compete the moneychangers. Even if you win, the Beast lives on in you.

Connelly also writes, "While terrorism is one clear risk, it is not the only one, as Taken shows." Again, not fully false, but not fully true. Even Boromir realized that Sauron must be destroyed, but he just didn't see the correct way how to do it. "Terrorism" is a problem, yes, but does Connelly see the bulk of it as a Jewish media created mirage and/or Israeli false flags? He mentions skepticism for the official 9/11 story and the Lavon Affair, yet at the same time he still seems to believe the official hogwash stories and "explanations" - Connelly sees Taken as propaganda, but then actually buys its Jewish message.

With the examples of Jewish double-standards that Connelly provides, it is really hard to grasp why he doesn't wrap up the article with the point that Judaism is fundamentally immoral. It is the oldest lie-to-get-ahead scheme in the World. He doesn't mention that Jews view all non-Jews as "goys" - an exploitable resource in the form of sentient beings. He opposes the Jew, yet he doesn't hit him where it will deal the most effective strike to the Jewish lies. From this, we can see that he is, in all probability, being led by the Jew and doesn't even know it.

---------------------------
A Spoke in the Goy Wheel
---------------------------

Alternate version of the rebuttal HERE

December 27, 2010

"He-Man" was a Nazi - Part II

I remember bits and pieces of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe from childhood. One of the first comic books that I remember owning was one with He-Man. The show was being re-run at that point and this re-airing must have not lasted for very long, as I did not remember too much of the show. However, I distinctly remember watching G.I. Joe, which had numerous toys, games, re-vamps, and made-for-TV movies, as well as an overblown Hollywood movie in the summer of 2009 as part of its franchise.

However, due to YouTube and the official He-Man channel there, I was able to rediscover this show and I must say that it is a real hidden gem amongst the piles of garbage that can be found in TV land. Not surprisingly, the show ran for only 130 or so episodes, while other programs that had no intention of providing good social messages and/or teaching about ethical positives, tend to go on for season after season. He-Man also had its share of short-lived re-incarnations, but none caught on as well as shows like The Simpsons or South Park, which were of much better quality when they first aired, but have steadily slipped down into a fester-pot of tired unoriginality and blatant scatological humor. The latter goes double for South Park that is best described as an "equal opportunity ridicule machine" - the creators of the show, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, just pick up on mainstream media hot-topics and ridicule them into the ground. Many of the people they tear to pieces probably deserve it, but that doesn't mean that the show serves any useful purpose. By now the show is pretty much the equivalent of a dog passing gas - it only matters for a second and only a few other dogs will ever bother to notice. Pretty much all of mainstream TV is deserving of this anti-accolade.

For now, enough ripping on the media, let's take a look at some of the first episodes of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe.

The Cosmic Comet - Skeletor attempts to use a magic comet against the good beings on Eternia. The job of stopping such a powerful force is too much for He-Man alone, so he seeks helps from an old wizard. The "evil comet" doesn't end up destroyed but paired with another magic comet and this stops it from wreaking havoc. This plot element is very interesting as it shows that He-Man and the good-guys on Eternia do not seek to destroy evil, but rather to ameliorate it. The magic comets, are perhaps more aptly described as some sort of celestial beings or life-forces, that have taken comet form. Skeletor attempts to use this power for evil, while He-Man for good. This doesn't mean reining in the comet-being, but rather letting it make its own choice, and once it sees that Skeletor is using it for his own ends, it stops serving him.

This episode is a good display of one of the show's major themes and over-arching conflicts: Honor - symbolized by He-Man - versus Dishonor - symbolized by Skeletor. He-Man uses his magic, namely his sword, to be able to directly deal with the enemy and he never initiates violence with it. On the other hand, Skeletor constantly schemes with magic to be able to get an upper hand and to avoid dealing directly with his enemies.

The Shaping Staff - Evil-Lyn, one of Skeletor's closest allies, uses a magic staff that can change someone's appearance in order to sneak her way into the Eternian Royal Palace. This is a very direct continuation of the scheming with magic theme. This plan also allows for the planting of a parasitic advisor as Evil-Lyn, posing as a traveling magician, makes King Randor disappear and reappear, but this was just a quick ruse to replace Randor with Beastman (another one of Skeletor's key allies) who is in the semblance of the King due to the staff's magic. This move is really a combination of the parasitic advisor and Manchurian candidate tactics.

In this episode, Skeletor also creates a being in the semblance of He-Man so as to fool the Eternians, which is just another parasite-placement tactic; they are literally the mainstay of Skeletor's battle with He-Man and Co. The creation of mindless servants to do his bidding also mirrors the golem from Jewish lore - it is an example of avoiding direct conflict by orchestrating puppets.

The Disappearing Act - The subversive tactics of Skeletor continue in this episode as he kidnaps Prince Adam and sets him as bait with the hope that He-Man will rescue him. Of course, Skeletor has no idea that Prince Adam is actually He-Man. Other than Adam, only Man-at-Arms, Orko and Cringer the Tiger know of this warrior alter-ego.

This episode demonstrates that without trustworthy allies, even the strong He-Man would not be able to effectively fight - camaraderie is essential for a Kampf to go forward and succeed. This notion also effectively makes He-Man antonymic to the Lone Wolf archetype that seems to be so popular in most superheroes - he is not arrogant, not a loner, nor does he project his eccentricities (when he is Prince Adam) - He-Man is pretty much the essence of honor, helping anyone and everyone without expecting anything in return. He possesses many traits that can be seen in the stories of Christ, Mohammed and Buddha.

Man-at-Arms (whose name is actually Duncan, but he goes by his title for the most part) is head of the Royal Palace guards. The plural of that title, Men-at-Arms, could be seen as a translation of "Schutzstaffel," which means "Protective Echelon" and the SS was set-up as a guard unit for an authoritative and militarist leader, Adolf Hitler. Note, Man-at-Arms's helmet design.

Freies Eternien!

He has two S shaped Bolts on either side of his helmet and the same type of helmet is worn by all Eternian Royal Palace Guards. The S-bolts often seem like one band that stretches around the back of the helmet, but in several close-ups Man-at-Arms can be seen looking down or turning around and this always reveals that it is actually two identical bolt shapes.

Diamond Ray of Disappearance - The ever scheming Skeletor has cooked up another plan to subversively take over the rule of Eternia. He has found the long lost gem of the episode's title that causes all who look into to it to be transported into some other dimension. Once again, this is all to avoid direct engagement with his the Noble Eternians. In one scene of this episode, Skeletor even brings rocks to life and they take a humanoid form and this is yet another golem summoned by the main antagonist.

Oddly, Skeletor is shown as being quite muscular, yet he almost never uses his physical strength, which suggests that these muscles are just another illusion. He looks intimidating and strong, but the fact is that his power is actually quite easily sapped, since it has no real foundation - just smoke and mirrors.

Each He-Man episode presents a relavant lesson at the end. This is always seen in the form of a brief scene that brings the episode's events into real World context. These coda scenes were one of the show's main ethical positives and they are something that practically all contemporary TV programs lack. The one presented here is about how quick routes to riches and power are almost always wrong. Thus, He-Man stands for honest work so as to provide honest results.

The She-Demon of Phantos - This episode contains some very interesting images. Skeletor has decided to subvert Eternia's weapons production by infiltrating the refinery in Phantos where Man-at-Arms acquires the metal needed for his workshop and forge. Skeletor hides behind a curtain and it is revealed that the supplies that the Eternians just bought are a fraud - worthless and frail ore - and that Skeletor blackmailed the Queen of Phantos, Elmora, to get his way.

Back on Eternia, Man-at-Arms has made some weapons, which includes a shield with an Iron Cross design, much like He-Man's breastplate. The fake metal soon becomes apparent when the newly forged weapons fall apart. Our clever heroes soon figure out Skeletor's newest parasite tactic and the coward antagonist immediately folds in fear as he is found out.

The interesting thing is that the spell that Skeletor puts on Elmora makes her see her friend, He-Man, as her actual enemy, Skeletor. This is really interesting, as Elmora knows that Skeletor is her enemy, but he just uses misdirection here and doesn't at all try to hide his guilt, just deflect attention away from it. The criminal Jew does this the same way by making Adolf Hitler seem like a mass-murderer when it is actually the Jew and his puppet Gentiles that are to blame.

Teela's Quest - This is an interesting episode in that it provides a side-track to the main storyline. We learn a bit about the background of Teela, whom Man-at-Arms raised as his own daughter, but she is actually adopted. Skeletor hardly plays a role in this episode, he just sends out Mer-Man to capture Teela as she travels to an oracle.

There is also a great scene that shows He-Man for the honorable warrior that he really is. He-Man actually saves Mer-Man, a sworn enemy, from certain death after the villain loses control over an ancient beast that he had magically reined, but soon it broke out into a rampage.

"In this war – as almost always – the unjust are known by their arrogance, their pride and their bullying nature. In this war – as almost always – the just are known by their honour, and by their noble behaviour." ~David Myatt

He-Man, most certainly, possesses the honor of which Myatt speaks. Letting Mer-Man die would have been an unrighteous act, but one that could easily be written off as a convenience. This is such a favorite tactic of the Jew, that he has gone so far as to orchestrate these kinds of "conveniences" as well as having a whole brigade of public relations officials that help pave over the resulting criminality.

Aryanism in He-Man
It is an unmistakable set of parallels that He-Man and the Masters of the Universe shares with National Socialist Germany. However, He-Man also fits as a part of a much grander mosaic - that of Aryanism. He-Man's appearance has been described as "Germanic" and this is quite appropriate, since historically, out of all the European peoples, it was the Germans who were the best example of Aryanism, particularly after Germany had become united in the later 19th century. Other nations only had the odd Aryanist individual here or there. However, German thinkers like Martin Luther, Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche and eventually Adolf Hitler all spoke out, in their own way, against everything that Jewry stands for.

The Jew is well aware of this and it is no mistake that one of the leading Zionist apologists had this to say:

"Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate -healthy virile hate- for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German." ~Elie "I might have survived exactly four or five death camps" Wiesel

If you think about it, that makes sense from the Jewish point of view. The German has repeatedly advocated against every major Judaic poison - Luther against the corruption of Christianity, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche against materialism, and Hitler was essentially a grand culmination of all this. He took it to the next exponential level - a nation-wide re-Germanization of all major aspects of society, and this was to then permeate down into each household and family member. He addressed both general concepts and took direct action. Essentially, Hitler held out a nice big silver mirror to the Jew, who then saw his own ugly character right in front of him. And it is for this that the Jew will never forgive Hitler. Not with the Talmudized ego that he possesses.

Today, Hitler’s concepts are being studied by members of practically every ethnic group and those people are seeing how Der Fuhrer’s ideas apply to their own nation. Perhaps this is why the Jew is becoming increasingly volatile in his actions, but often just plain old careless. War crimes, such as those in Gaza (a small piece of land that is essentially being used as an "internment territory") are being harder and harder to defend - shamelessness is no longer enough!

Story Dyanamics
This publicity image for He-Man shows some of the main story dynamics.


On the edges we have the animal-like characters: One bad - a crude beast. One good - a graceful bird with divine knowledge.

Then, the women-warriors, note that their breastplates and collars are very similar. The bad uses magical schemes to fight. The good uses her own wits and weapons in battle.

This is taken to the next level with the male warriors. The bad, Skeletor, creates many of the schemes and magical devices used by his allies, and he also summons golems to fight. The good, Man-at-Arms, forges weapons and commands actual troops in battle to help his allies. Orko's placement right above Man-at-Arms is accurate as he is the good side's magician, thus both these characters form the opposite to Skeletor. Orko also provides much of the show's humor and makes his friends laugh, while Skeletor's laughter usually comes when he feels like one of his schemes will work, it is a self-serving laughter.

Then, the apex of power is only attainable to the good, though the bad try and clamor up there every chance they get. He-Man is the ultimate combination of magical power and physical fighting ability. This is a dangerous combination, so only a few are privy to it, the noblest stock of Eternia. Ironically, this doesn’t include the King, but King Randor is highly respected and gives orders to Man-at-Arms who works closely with He-Man. Thus, the titular hero is like a secret guardian angel - all effort, no reward, and it's all fine by him - a true Ubermensch and even an Arhat.

Part I was a reply to that one particular video, but with this much closer examination of the show's content, I must correct my previous statement that the show "contains allusions to National Socialist ideas, though just on simple level" -- the allusions are not so simple! They actually permeate the show and reflect NS ideals close enough to make the show a good element on The Storytelling Front.

-------------------------------------------------
He-Man and the Masters of the Universe fan site
-------------------------------------------------

SEE ALSO: ThunderCats review

December 19, 2010

"He-Man" was a Nazi - Part I

I was given a link to a particular video not too long ago. This four minute video was basically a simple video-essay on how the cartoon character, He-Man, was a drawn from Nazi images and themes. The ominous music accompanying the piece seems to suggest a steadily creeping evil. The ironic part is that the video, on a simplistic level, is quite true - the show He-Man and the Masters of the Universe did align for the most part with much of the image of National Socialist Germany as propagated by the Allied and Soviet propaganda machines. However, the people behind that propaganda painted the Nazis as Devil Incarnates, but in the show, "the Aryan barbarian," He-Man, is the good guy of the series. We'll get into why in a little bit.

First, the video: Nazi He-Man!

The video is a rather lame propaganda vehicle, at best. Let's identify its weak points.

Target One: The Opening Quote
The opening quote is by Robert E. Howard, who was the American author who conceived the character, Conan the Barbarian. So it is not unreasonable to associate his writing with He-Man who is quite similar in appearance and general mythos. He-Man creator, Louis Scheimer, even based his character on Conan, though he opted for a less violent protagonist by writing He-Man as character that delivers a positive social message. The end of each episode features a short lesson or moral derived from the episode's themes. Robert E. Howard wrote in the 1920s an 1930s when racism, especially white supremacy, was rampant in the United States, thus the quote from one of his works is really a product of its time. When the video's author links the quote to the Nazis, however, he mysteriously does not provide any source nor does he provide proof that any leading Nazi Official admired Howard's fiction or anything of the like. If the Nazis were so obsessed with blonde-haired and blue eyed people, they wouldn't have approved of Hitler as their leader since he had dark hair. Thus, this video's attempt at connecting Nazism to racism is just a bridge to nowhere.

This point is further weakened by the fact that the video then shows a dark-eyed He-Man. He doesn't have blue eyes!

Target Two: The Iron Cross
The video then links He-Man to Nazism by pointing out the cross on his breastplate. It does, in fact, look like an Iron Cross, but the Iron Cross is not a Nazi creation. The Iron Cross became a military decoration and recognition of a soldier's valor in Prussia in 1813. The design was by Prussian architect Karl Schinkel, who based his design off of the cross of the Teutonic Knights. The Iron Cross also bears a strong resemblance to the Maltese Cross, which has its origin back in the Crusades when the Knights of St. John engaged the Saracens on the island of the Malta. The Saracens had weaponized fire, which proved to be a very effective weapon. The many knights in that battle who had saved their comrades from fiery death were award badges of honor, and these featured the cross that eventually became knows as "the Maltese Cross" - a recognition of bravery in the fires of war.

Hint: they're not all Nazis.

The design from the 1770s in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth appears to be the oldest of the Iron Cross variants, but it was actually a hoisted banner used by the Hussar Cavalry and was known as "Husarski Krzyż" (Eng. - "Hussar Cross"). The first time it was used as an award was with the 1813 Prussian variant. Also, the 1920s Polish version of the Iron Cross was a unit insignia, of the "Death Hussars," during the Polish-Soviet War and not an award.

The basic design for this military icon is far from being exclusively Germanic. The pictures above are only a fraction of badges/military decorations that employ the Iron Cross/Maltese Cross motif. Note that even US Fire Departments make use of a similar design for their badges, this refers back to the story from Malta. Also, the German Armed Forces today, the Bundeswehr, not only use the Iron Cross insignia on vehicles, but also award a new variant of the Cross for valor.

Target Three: The Tiger
Prince Adam has a humble cat companion named Cringer. When Prince Adam assumes his warrior form of He-Man, the normally calm Cringer becomes Battle Cat, whom He-Man rides into battle. The main German battle tanks during the Second World War, were named after large cats - the "Tiger" and the "Panther." However, the connection to Nazism is, once again, totally superficial. The Bundeswehr's main battle tank today is called the Leopard... yep another big cat. Also, the video makes the point that the Tiger symbolized the Nazi Military as a whole, but this image was the product of Allied and Soviet propaganda. Thus, the video just effectively contradicted itself.

Target Four: The Lightning
When Prince Adam transforms into He-Man, he does so but drawing a sword and taking on his powerful alter-ego with a flash of lightning, which also transforms Cringer into Battle Cat. The video then states that the "Nazi military" was so effective due to the use of "Blitzkrieg" (Eng. - Lightning War) tactics. In a way, this is true as the Blitzkrieg was a revolutionary general attack strategy that coordinated ground and air forces, as well as gave officers in the field much more flexible orders for how to command their own soldiers and how to approach objectives. All this amounted to rapid military advances, but also allowed for quick, coordinated fall back moves as well.

The Blitzkrieg was conceived by the military strategist Heinz Guderian who served in the regular army and not the Schutzstaffel as the ominously placed SS Bolts seem to suggest. By war's end, Heinz Guderian was not convicted of war crimes and his conduct was deemed that of a professional soldier. His military theories went on to redefine war strategy and, like the cat names for German tanks, as well as the Iron Cross, those theories are still in effect today and are used by every modernized military.

The maker of this video must see Nazis in his sleep, since a warrior figure with thunder and lighting reminds me more of the Norse god Thor than anything else. The Scandinavian countries, to this day, have big cats as centerpieces for their national emblems.

Target Five: The Eagle
One of He-Man's key helpers is the Sorceress, who is said to be "an Aryan woman who dresses as, you guessed it, a Bundesadler Eagle." Actually, the Sorceress's bird form is a falcon, but I suppose that we could let that one slide. What we cannot let slide, however, is that the hopelessly naive out there (among whom the video maker can be found if anyone cares to look for him/her) will never comprehend the fact that "Aryan" does not mean "ethnic German" or "Germanic" or anything ethnic specific. Two of the largest ancient Aryan sites are not located anywhere near Germany - one is in Russia and the other one is in Bulgaria. Russia and Bulgaria are Slavic nations. According to Allied and Soviet propaganda that has become so firmly entrenched in peoples' perception of the Third Reich, the Nazis were said to have detested the Slavs right down to their core. Thus, news stories about archeological sites like this don't ever make mainstream news, since they effectively put a huge hole in the established lies and perpetuated illusions.

Also, it is down right to ridiculous to say that the Eagle logo is exclusively Nazi, since there are a great many countries that use an eagle for their Coat of Arms. The Great Seal of the United States also features a large eagle with wings spread out.

Target Six: The Protocols
The text, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (there are some variations as to the exact title) is said to be the "Anti-Semitic, Conspiracy Theory manifesto." The video then states that said manifesto "paints its 'Jewish conspiracy' as a Snake eating the world, as orchestrated by a Secret Society called Skull and Bones." The Skull and Bones is a secret society from Yale University and it has many pro-Zionist politicians on its exclusive list of members, including former Connecticut Senator Prescott Bush, father of former U.S. President George H.W. Bush and grandfather of yet another man to hold that office, George W. Bush. Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, who ran against George W. Bush in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election, is also a member. However, this one society, based in one university is hardly worthy enough to be blamed for all of the Jewish subversion in the World. Thinking along the lines that this video proposes will result only in foolishness. One must actually apply what they learn to the real World. And one famous American did just that.

"The only state I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW." ~Henry Ford, as quoted in an interview in 'New York World' on 17/2/1921

Sign up today!

Henry Ford didn't start to circulate and print copies of this text out of unprovoked hatred for the Jews. Though, the expert victim Jew likes to see it that way; he likes to paint his opposition as irrational so that anyone who speaks out against Jewry can be easily just branded an "anti-Semite." This goes for people that possess numbskull hate (as seen in neo-Nazis and racists) as well as people utilizing rational observation and application of knowledge like Adolf Hitler and authentic National Socialists, the latter to this day. Additionally, the term "anti-Semite" is intrinsically absurd as Arabs are also Semites and the main source of anti-Arab hate in this World are none other than Zionist Jews - thus they brand themselves with their own malicious label! Just don't expect them to admit that. It would be too much of a hassle for them to see past the illogic of their own arid hate and think of something rational to call their enemies.

Of course it is not just the Jews that fall into this self-perpetuated pit of folly. Long before he became Der Fuhrer, Adolf Hitler had noticed this in a great number of people. His thoughts are aptly summarized in the following passages from Mein Kampf:

"I know people who read interminably, book after book, from page to page, and yet I should not call them 'well-read people'. Of course they 'know' an immense amount; but their brain seems incapable of assorting and classifying the material which they have gathered from books. They have not the faculty of distinguishing between what is useful and useless in a book."
~Adolf Hitler    

"The material which one has acquired through reading must not be stored up in the memory on a plan that corresponds to the successive chapters of the book; but each little piece of knowledge thus gained must be treated as if it were a little stone to be inserted into a mosaic, so that it finds its proper place among all the other pieces and particles that help to form a general world-picture in the brain of the reader. Otherwise only a confused jumble of chaotic notions will result from all this reading." ~Adolf Hitler

This idea of applying knowledge was also something Tolkien wrote about in relation to his great work, The Lord of the Rings. He didn't want people to see it as an allegory for Europe and European nations - he preferred "applicability."

"I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its prescence." ~J.R.R. Tolkien, forward to 'Fellowship of the Ring'

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is routinely called a "forgery" and "a fraudulent text" by the mainstream press. About six months after Henry Ford, a famous and influential person, went on record as supporting the distribution of the text, an Irish journalist named Philip Graves, who worked for The Times, a London-based newspaper, "uncovered" that it's actually a hoax. The nature of this connection is about as solid as the "proof" for homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. The story took a while to invent, note that they didn't just automatically refute Ford, but needed time to cook up the right story. Eventually, a newspaper from one of the main hubs of the International Bankster Jews, produced the "refutation" that was immediately taken as "sacred truth."

FEUER FREI!

Well, there you have it. The weak points of this enemy vehicle. You know what to do with that Panzerschreck.

Conclusion
Basically, He-Man and the Masters of the Universe contains allusions to National Socialist ideas, though just on a simple level. The maker of the video above undoubtedly noticed this, but they can't get their head around all the anti-Nazi propaganda that they've been fed since grade school. In fact, given the intelligence level of most anti-Nazi information, I was expecting that at some point, someone was going to label Skeletor as "the evil Nazi," since his face is like the SS Totenkopf, his castle represents the snake that corrupted Adam and Eve, and his cohorts are brutes - that image is actually how Nazis are most often represented - "the incarnation of absolute evil." It is, in a way, ironic that the video's creator saw Skeletor as the Jew; it was a keen observation, but they took the final step, applying the story's symbols to the real World, the wrong way and saw He-Man as subversive evil.

SEE ALSO: Part II, review of the actual show.

October 18, 2010

Messages in Majdanek

I recently had an unexpected chance to go to the Zionist Propaganda Museum in Majdanek, just outside of Lublin, Poland. I took the opportunity and the visit was interesting, to say the least. By today, the city of Lublin has grown much and practically reaches vast open field that is the former internment camp from the Second World War, though this area was never really as far removed from urban areas as the other camps of its kind. The official information at the camp even makes note of this “exception.” On the way to the museum one can read the official name that has been given to this place, “Majdanek Museum of Martyrdom.” If you are coming from center city Lublin as I was, you have to drive along the aforementioned field for a while before coming to the main visitors' entrance. Along this stretch there is a great stone monument that will aptly sum up the rest of your visit: impact.

Not information, but impact. Be it visual or from the mouth of a tour guide, impression making tools await to mold your perceptions so that they are as guided as the tour itself.

The Majdanek camp was turned into a museum in August of 1944, well before the war even ended, and less than a month after the Soviets captured the area. This was done under the direct supervision of the Soviet Propaganda Machine, which would go on to serve as a main provider of "evidence" against the Schutzstaffel in 1945. Immediately local, regional and national publications churned out Soviet approved stories of what went on in the camp and all this information was promptly used to demonize the Nazis. This may also explain why Stalin was so intent on keeping Eastern Europe under his control, it gave him exclusive control over the so-called "death camps" and what evidence was extracted from them and then used against the Germans.

Interestingly, Majdanek is one of those infamous "death camps" that supposedly had a homicidal chamber and massive crematorium going on overtime to exterminate any and every person that the Nazis disapproved of. Let's take a look at the official camp tally.

Numbers Speak

78,000 dead. Given poor and dirty wartime conditions, which included a typhus epidemic and the Jews' own lack of cleanliness, this number can begin to make sense. Odd is the fact that the Polish word by this figure is “zgineło” meaning “died” (there is no “killing” implied), yet the English version, and the one most international tourists invariably read, implies murder. The other translated pairs match up accurately, says this native Polish speaker.

45,000 transferred to other camps. Wait, transferred? I thought this was a Nazi Murder Machine death camp? Hmm... maybe I was wrong.

500 escaped. Ah, yes, a few rogues are always to be found. Also, it seems security wasn’t that intense: escaping from a guarded labor camp that’s next to a militarily occupied city in the middle of an occupied country and remaining officially declared as escaped seems like the Germans were not so intent on killing everyone in this camp. In additon, nothing was mentioned about what these escapees said... did they testify at Nuremberg? To the Soviets? If so what did they say and what was done with that information? Did it just not align with the propaganda so it was swept under the rug and the escapees then sent by Stalin to Siberia so as to remain forever quiet? Questions, questions; ones that demand answers.

18,000 released. Ok, seriously. They actually release people from “death camps” now? Why would those fiendishly evil, mass-murdering Nazis hell-bent on genocide ever do that? Well, if they were not “hell-bent on genocide” than this board of numbers is starting to make sense.

1,500 liberated. The Soviets “saved” less people than the Nazis. How amusing. Though this was, in all probability, just the amount people who were there when the Soviets showed up and after the Nazis retreated. Many more were likely to have left the first chance they got, meaning right after the SS cleared out. There was a big city nearby to go to... why wait inside a prison then if the door’s open?

One should also note the numbers, all nicely rounded, thus making them estimates at best. Odd, that a world famous museum has a mistranslation and estimates as main parts of its information and message, especially since it exhibits a topic that countless scholars were said to have accurately studied and reported.

Also, back to that mistranslation, this was not the first time I had seen a suspicious mistranslation related to WW2 labor camps. I say suspicious since it effectively makes the information presented not objective. In the movie Shutter Island from 2010 there is some back story involving the Dachau Massacre and in the dialog the main character first says “death camp” in English and then in German as “Konzentrationlager.” Strange, since the German translates to simply “Concentration Camp” (the direct literal translation), but the term “Internment Camp” can also be used. Ever wonder why the Allied forces have “Concentration Camps” but the Germans have “Death Camps?” It’s WW2 Allied propaganda still in play and it has become firmly rooted into peoples’ psyche. Even if one looks at the fact that the German camps did have more death, especially towards the end of the war, it’s because German resources were stretched very thin and often down right destroyed from the air courtesy of the Allies and their aerial assaults even on civilian areas. Dresden would be the most infamous example from the latter category here: people flooded to the Saxon city as refugees as it remained the one major supply hub for civilians in the area, and then the city was bombed despite having no military or strategic importance. If civilians fared this well from the efforts of the “heroic” Allied forces, then how might you think prisoners had it?

Mistranslation here, misunderstanding there, white washing here, exaggeration there... WW2 history is plagued by these things and all those little mistakes play against the reputation of the Germans and those who were at arms with them. This cannot be a grand coincidence. It’s deliberate LIES.

The gate to the main compound in Majdanek has a sign that says, among other things, that no one under 14 years of age will be admitted. Given the horror stories visitors hear inside, this may very well be some good sense, but something else made me think different.

There was an Israeli student tour group at the camp and all the kids looked junior high school age more or less, 14 or just a bit older. Interesting fact of psychology is that kids learn quickest and are most impressionable when they are under 12. The brain is still developing and many childhood lessons go on to define the shape of the adult to come. Israel is insanely particular about controlling the flow of information pertaining to it or information that it has interest in. Just look at any one of the countless “controversial incidents” involving the IDF, the smell of a cover-up or lies seems to be practically synonymous with such things. Jack Bernstein, an American Jew (and a man who is clearly leaning more towards rationalism than Zionist Propaganda), was disgusted by Israeli power hungriness and lies, noted in his book that when he went to the supposed “haven” for Jews of the World, that tourism was strictly monitored, what people could see was tightly controlled, where they could go was very directed and under constant police supervision. Are we to believe that the Israeli educational system is all that different? Those kids when they are still under 12 must be drilled to the core with Holocaust lore and completely shaken up by all the gruesome Zionist hyperboles. Then when they finally come to these “museums” to “learn” the indoctrination doesn’t stop. Not at all.

There was a tour group of slightly older Polish students at Majdanek that day too and I linked up with them during one exhibit, the one containing the overview of the entire camp. The tour guide was being intensely emotional and his speech was punctuated with key words that go along with the museum's design of teaching by shock and instilling a desire for a passionate reaction of hate or some sort of defense from fear. This “tour guide” with his sorrowful voice amounting to cheesy dramatic acting said that the camp commandant would take his young daughter to see mass executions of Jews (of course Jews, always Jews) and would even strategically cross the camp with her so they’d go through as much ground as possible so that maybe she’d get a glimpse of a “random lynching that the SS often carried out” on one of the numerous gallows that were “all over the camp.” So apparently, the men of Schutzstaffel weren’t just mass-murdering psychopaths, they were also the World’s worst parents.

In the moment, when I heard the last word of that anecdote uttered, I was convinced that Zionist Propaganda lost some of its usual bad taste and picked up a whole lot of idiocy to compensate.

There is one section of the camp that has been kept standing and the normal tour path goes through it, however, there were renovations being done there, so I just happened to come across it on a day when it was closed. The workers were making a new stone walkway through the camp grounds. I did notice, however, that there were none of the aforementioned gallows to be seen. The area was being renovated, but only a walkway down the center was being placed, the buildings by which the “numerous gallows” were said to have been were not being worked on. Another flub in Zionist Propaganda, in all likelihood.

The last site to visit here is the flagship of the tour and of Holocaust lore: the crematorium, where the industrially efficient mass-murder was said to have taken place. First off, the standard for “death camp” is incredibly shaky... if Auschwitz is a “death camp” with 1,000,000 dead, then how does Majdanek even begin to compare with 78,000? Majdanek is a lot smaller, so that could explain some discrepancy and it does have one of those supposed “gas chambers,” thus it doesn’t matter how many people died, but how they died. Ok, fair enough. Let’s look at a gas chamber from the era of when this camp was in operation.

This article, from the Commitee for Open Debate On the Holocaust, is lengthy and gets into serious details, but in the beginning there is a nice explanation of 1920s and 1930s era gas chambers, including ones that used Zyklon-B. Also is worth noting that they were made by Degesch, a German company. Thus Adolf Hitler, being the Fuhrer, effectively had unlimited access to this technology if he so desired. As did Heinrich Himmler, the SS Reichsfuhrer who oversaw the entire penitentiary system of the Third Reich.

I can tell you, dear reader, that there is nothing in Majdanek that even begins to resemble such a large and complex machine. There are some ovens, standard mortuary ovens, that were used for cremation. It was a very necessary process to contain disease and likely ALL dead were cremated, SS Man and prisoner (the city morgue in Lublin had also been likely ordered to burn bodies), since corpses can harbor massive amounts of germs and disease, especially when people died from typhus or any other deadly disease and each body in the ground was basically a lethal germ warehouse. The Germans went so far as to be thorough that they dug up previously buried dead and started to cremate them... hence the pictures of mounds of dead and crematory ovens going overtime. It was a massive and frantic effort of sanitation that, for all intents and purposes, was meant to save lives of all those in the area - German soldier, Polish citizen, and all prisoners be they POWs, political detainees or Jews.

One major reason that the gas chamber horror story remains official history is due to Soviet propaganda, which had enormous Jewish contributions. Soviet Commissars were greeted by Jews when Stalin invaded Poland, because many of them were Jews themselves. In fact, why didn’t the West declare war on the USSR which invaded Poland like Germany? Well, the fact is that Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union. However, Hitler had freed German society and culture from the highly disproportionate and destructive influence of the Jews and was promptly branded as the Devil. The International Jew’s War was with the Germans and their Fuhrer, the USSR merely provided one of the front lines of attack. Fortunately, some rationalism remained in the West and after the war on that side of the Iron Curtain the so called “death camps” were forensically examined to reveal no homicidal gas chambers, but ones for standard fumigation purposes meant to prevent the spread of disease. The USSR leadership, to help keep the focus away from monstrous Soviet crimes, did not permit Western forensic investigators to inspect the “death camps” in Poland, nor did they carry out such an investigation by themselves. They just rebuilt (often clumsily) the destroyed parts of many of the camps to accentuate their own anti-German propaganda, which then played a key role in the Nuremberg Show Trials.

The large stone monument where the propaganda tour starts.

Today, it is being used as indoctrination information and that Israeli student tour group are in effect, its latest victims. They’re kids, they don’t know better and out of all the students on this planet who “learn” about the “Holocaust” it is those Israelis that probably get drilled like no other. First when they are impressionable young children under 12 at home, then they go on these school trips so that they can evoke their first passionate internal reactions. Then they will return home, finish high school, and go on to carry out their required military service, but by then they'll be packed with as much Jewish fanaticism, persecution myth and blind devotion to the blue hexagram as is possible. They are victims because they are being deliberately misinformed so that they can perpetuate the Zionist crimes and related madness. They are being primed to be hate-filled IDF criminals and then life-long Zionist fanatics.

The intensity of “education” can be seen even right during the tour. One girl started to cry, others sang a requiem of some sort by the crematorium ovens. There was also a little bit of vandalism that I spotted: there were these signs in a side room, shaped like gravestones, and each one had the name of one of the nationalities of “Holocaust” victims. The sign for The Germans was scratched and some of the letters had been scraped off. Some apt pupil had already learned what his masters want him to do.

Questioning the official mythos of this propaganda is a punishable crime in virtually every Western nation, except the United States where rational investigators are merely shunned, stigmatized, and passively secluded from their job, their peers, and the decent life the may have had before they asked a “wrong” question or two. Or reached an "improper" conclusion, however logical it may be. In Poland, an example of academic fortitude, Professor Dariusz Ratajczak, who published a booklet called “Tematy Niebezpieczne” (Eng. - “Dangerous Topics”) in March of 1999, which raised questions about the official Zionist Approved Story, saw his life disintegrate professionally and personally for just over 10 years until his murder, which was officially declared a suicide. The Israeli Mossad was known to be operating in Poland, a supposed ally to Israel, but the Zionists spy and perpetrate crimes against everyone, so are we really all that surprised?

There are still rationalist investigators for the truth working out there, like David Irving and Fredrick Toben. Both did time in prison and both push on in their mission of enlightening the World. They are also more known worldwide than Ratajczak was, so their prospective lethal subversion by the Mossad would not be as covert as the Zionist fanatics normally like their crimes to be.

Truth doesn’t fear investigation, yet “the Holocaust” does. What does that tell you? Even if you don’t see the folly of it all.

October 14, 2010

The War of Words: Storytelling Front

We are in a War of Words. There are many frontlines in this highly amorphous conflict. The Political Front may be the most obvious, but I believe that storytelling is also vital for this.

“An important prerequisite of a movement is a common vocabulary. The ability to form a unified front against Zionism, as well as the pursuit of Aryanism, requires clean and accurate expression of our positions. Emphasis must be placed on the use of common vocabulary by all supporters and allies of our movement.”

Thus, vocabulary is absolutely indispensable to the Aryan Movement, but words are only a means to a goal or ideal. Much like the National Socialist view on money, as a tool to serve a purpose and the lifeblood of an economy, words are the lifeblood of commincation, be it story/recollection, philosophy or political rhetoric. The Movement may be small now, but as it grows, there will be key ideas keeping it standing and goals still driving it forward. These ideas will have started as mere words and it is how we apply those words that will make the ideas, and goals that they lead to, uniquely Aryan.

In this article the reader can find an overview of the Campaign we find ourselves in. These ideas, however, will apply a little differently depending on role an Aryanist within the movement. A medic, a rifleman, and a radio operator may all be on the same general front line and may all have learned many of the same skills in basic training, but when the going gets real, each has a critically different duty to carry out so that the campaign proceeds forward.

Historically, storytelling has been a vital part of culture. Ancient Greece may be long gone, but Homer’s Odyssey is still being read and discussed. Der Fuhrer Adolf Hitler may have passed from this Earth, but Mein Kampf still lives strong. It can be said that this book was a key element in National Socialist mobilization in 1920s Germany. Ideas amount to nothing unless they are communicated, and so Der Fuhrer did just that. He effectively spoke to an entire nation - no scratch that - to the entire World with his book. The work contains many forms of written word: story/recollection, philosophy and political rhetoric. When it was being written, the NS movement was small and had just been overpowered and repressed, so this vital cornerstone that would prop it back up had to arch over many aspects in order to contain the full founding philosophy of a movement.

“First there was the Word.”

Mein Kampf was a major step in Adolf Hitler’s will to “recreate mankind anew.” The recreating of so many things anew needs to get more and more specific and storytelling is one of the next steps. I have looked at some films and media on this blog, in which I have identified both Aryan themes and ZC Propaganda. This is by no means an exhaustive examination of each story presented, but should serve as a springboard into the reader’s examination of their own favorite films. Note that Aryan themes are often subtle and in today’s mass-media they can usually be found in bits and pieces, here and there. Very few works are brimming with Aryanism, though there are exceptions like Cutthroat Island or ThunderCats.

Once a good sense of Aryanism is developped, identifying it in other streams of information should be easier. Today there is an immense amount of information flow, thus Aryanism has many potential routes, but also can be fairly easily drowned out in irrelevance. The mass-media is expert at creating programs that amount to Aldous Huxley’s imagined drug of Soma, thus it is easy to get lost and disoriented. On the other hand, this means that Aryanism, once spotted, is likely to be very obvious. Skepticism is always good for investigation, so take nothing at face value, but with a careful sense and dedication little shining embers of Arya will likely surprise you from very many different vantage points. Go to them!

Also important - Start to speak Aryan rhetoric so that when you are confronted by a Zionist or one of their lapdog goyim (i.e. an American neo-conservative) their words will be powerless. Kamerad Delendaestziobot wrote a good piece about rhetoric. Take careful note of how this applies to your chosen specialization within the Aryan Movement as well as generally. Again - medic, rifleman, radioman; all different, but part of the same unit.

Aryanism will only live if we live it. Or, the words of Ghandi, “You must be the change that you wish to see in the World.”

Tower of Babel
This is the Jewish paradigm for goy management. It applies to politics (capitalism vs. communism, right vs. left, etc…) as well as culture (social strife, religious conflict, etc…). To put it in brief, it is an idea to keep the goyim perpetually busy and yet achieve no progress. As the story goes, the people wanted to build a great tower to reach the heavens, but YHWH the Jewish idol, confused their speech and the tower was never finished. YHWH attacked their way with words to make unity impossible. Jewish over-influenced politics today is much the same thing - we have so much technology and capacity and labor power as well as people needing the work and wages, yet what gets done? A recent and iconic example would be left-wingers arguing with conservatives over a Mosque in downtown Manhattan. This conflict also played out along religious lines. The Jew can’t eliminate the Gentiles’ word, so he strives to make it useless and impotent by degrading it down to bickering. He does this all while ever refining his own words. Thus, today’s Tower can be seen as one of language and words, those that are needed to form a unity against the Jews, or the Aryan term, Unity through Nobility.

Work, work, work... and never get anything done.

ZC Propaganda Inc. routinely demonizes and vilifies everything the Jew disagrees with and it is a near perfect transposition of Kosher Slaughter into the form of word and story. Just take a look at some of the films glorifying violence, and especially the Quentin Tarantino trashterpiece Inglorious Basterds. Tarantino showed the film in Israel and the Jews cheered during the final mass slaughter of a shootout, since, in a bit of childish revisionism, Tarantino has Hitler shot to pieces in a Paris movie theatre to conclude the movie. Jews hate Hitler and despite that he has been dead for so long they still want to kill him brutally. Or see him die. The Jewish pleasure with slaughter never ceases to disgust. They literally feed themselves off of it. I direct the reader to my post on The Carnegie Deli to see just that I mean with that last sentence.

The Aryan Counter-Paradigm
Unity through Nobility, as I have said, is the motto behind the Aryan Movement, but our goal is NOT another (and better, stronger, etc…) Tower of Babel. That would be pointless. Our Aryan Counter-Paradigm is a Distillation Tower; only the noblest make it to the top and pass on to the infinity of Arya. Jews would think we’re playing with and stacking blocks… how wrong they are! We are recreating mankind anew with a complex new order that once in place for a solid amount of time, it will be impossible to imagine a different one. Our new system, and the words and stories that we’ll create within it, our new Noble Culture, will be increasingly impossible for the Jews to degrade. They have gotten used to same old thing, for one, but also, not enough people have actually attacked the Jew where it hurts him most - his tools for creating lies, namely his use of words. Render his production facilities useless and he’ll have to give up, and knowing the self-preserving nature of the Jew, he will.

Will you meet us at the top?

One example of this is that the popular term “anti-Semitism” (which is absurd to begin with, but hey, the Jews created it) went from meaning “envy of Jewish success” to “disgust towards Jewish racism” and the new catch phrase “an anti-Semite is not one who hates Jews, but one whom Jews hate” quickly started to make headway. One step in distillation has been made, a little lie reversed and the new meaning pure, but the process continues.

Another important aspect is that the Zionists’ (both Jews and Gentiles) main strategy has been effectively compromised.

Summary of Zionist trick:
1) Promote a policy that they know most people are too degraded to successfully execute.
2) Blame the policy instead of the people for the failure, allow their agents to reverse the policy and thus gain public trust.

Summary of Aryanist countermeasure:
1) Blame the people instead of the policy for the failure.
2) Make the policy work by gathering sufficiently capable people.

This reverse bluff paradigm applies to virtually the whole field of anti-Zionism. An Aryanist should see how it applies in their specialized field.

On the storytelling front, Hollywood plays a major role and all the Jewish owned studios routinely release films that echo what’s coming out of Washington DC. Just note the portrayal of Arabs throughout Hollywood’s history or for a specific example, just look at the film 300. I have a feeling that the recent film Prince of Persia: Sands of Time was a sort of apology from Hollywood about 300 and they finally showed Persia in a more pleasant light, however, they didn’t have any of the major roles played by Arabic actors and the main role went to Jake Gyllenhaal (Jew) and the film was produced by the Jerry Bruckheimer (Jew). Oh, Hollywood.

There are films that do contain genuine Aryan themes, some of which I have looked at here. An Aryanist’s examination of some their favorite films might reveal a deeper reason why they like them. Or maybe show that a film is actually un-Aryan. My opinion of many films that I used to greatly enjoy has changed much since I became an Aryanist. Right around the time that I started to read beyond the mainstream about the Third Reich, Tarantino’s Jewish fantasy from 2009 hit screens, and while I still viewed National Socialism as wrong at the time, I was approaching it from a rationalist view point (unlike the being spoon fed propaganda view point I had before) and the gleeful violence ending the film literally made me sick. I was only once before so furious at the stupidity of a movie before and that was when I saw Michael Bay’s Bad Boys 2 (another offering from the Jew, Bruckheimer) and it was also a spectacular disaster of gratuitous excess that all the goyim in the theatre cheered at. Perhaps, it’s odd that it took me this long to see past the goy illusion, literally it took all of college. Complex steps however, take time. As do campaigns. Aryanism is not an assembly line creation, it is expert craftsmanship and we are still all learning our trade. It took Adolf Hitler over ten years of hard work, which included prison time and the murder of Horst Wessel, among many other things, before his Kampf had a full scale mobilization. To create something genuine in a land of superficiality is hard work, especially when superficiality works day-to-day with illusion to create semblences of authenticity. And so it is, we must work hard and not lose our honorable standards. Never!

Prophet Mohammed, the Muslim's first teacher, lived by a much higher standard than he demanded of his followers. He was at the top of his movement, but not from pulling favors, he was fit to lead by his own honorable actions.

"The worst one of the people in the sight of God is the one who does not put his knowledge into practice." ~Mohammed

Archetypes
The historical archetype for the Jew is the Herder, the sly manipulator and profiteer from slaughter. Today this has been transposed into things like the corporate overlord and sleazy politician. The process remains the same, however, profiting from lies.

The Gentiles are historical Hunters, and the ever scheming Herder has invited them onto his game preserve to chase after his own animals keeping the consumer goyim ever busy trying to sustain themselves all while paying the Herder.

Aryans, the historical Farmers, never cared for quantity so much as for quality. Thus, the Herder’s monopolization has pushed the Aryans into small pockets here and there. Chances are that if someone, somehow, discovers Aryanism, they’ll be alone in their immediate area.

What binds us is our writing, our words. Be they stories, philosophy, political rhetoric, or even a short humorous anecdote. Though, stories remain unique and ever important, since they do not merely communicate the possibility of an idea, they show the idea in action via the art of fiction. This is a powerful tool that can be used without the compromising of one’s own honor. Use it.

"An idea that is developed and put into action is more important than an idea that exists only as an idea." ~Siddhartha

September 25, 2010

Still Being Revived: Clichés and Propaganda in “Dead Snow”

Is ZC Propaganda running out of ideas? That just might be and the Norwegian horror/comedy film Dead Snow directed by Tommy Wirkola is a case in point. The film is a well-executed little goof-ball of zombie gore, though that is not really saying that much… it’s not like there is a shortage of entries into this genre and it’s inevitable that every now and then they manage to make one that is at least mildly entertaining. The biggest catch here, as well as the main part of the film’s marketing (watch the trailer to see), is the fact that these are not your ordinary zombies… these are SS zombies! Or as I have come to see it as: Wolfenstein-style satire. Yes, the Jews and their Goys at ZC Propaganda Inc. have revived (yet again) their most-prolific boogeymen in order to have them wreck havoc on young student vacationers in Norway. Amusing that may be, however, the film does contain a bit of clever political engineering that I want to expose.

As a straight up gore-based horror flick, Dead Snow is a pretty competent entry into the genre. Featuring many references and little bits of homage to other movies, as well as better than average effects and production design for a film of its kind, it manages to entertain the masses. Funny thing is that the zombie SS Men have rotten flesh from being dead for over 60 years, yet their uniforms are still in pretty decent shape… I guess Nazis did have the World’s best uniforms! Also, a common movie goof has the SS wearing black uniforms, which were parade and ceremonial attire by the time the war started. In actuality, they should be wearing the SS Feldgrau uniform, however, this “error” is in so many films that it can only be seen as deliberate and a cliché to make the men wearing them seem more ominous. At face value a darker uniform looks more intimidating. This is also done to contrast SS Men from the supposedly “noble pawns” that there the regular Wehrmacht Heer soldiers. It is a slowly emerging phase of de-demonizing the Wehrmacht as a whole and only putting the “evil emphasis” on the SS. Note that the SS as portrayed here resemble the Persians as they were shown in 300.

"We're angry from all the slander."

Just look at those Swastika Armbands, they're still in tiptop shape! Das Hakenkreuz ist für immer, meine Kameraden!

This film is perhaps a perfect example of how the ZC Hounds perceive Nazis. They have one, and only one, concept of the National Socialists from 1930s Europe: evil psychotic bastards. Via saturation media propaganda the ZC has effectively “frozen” this image in an attempt at putting it into permanent existence in this state, they want to prevent it from changing in anyway so that it will be forever perceived in the way ZC Propaganda Inc. approves. They occasionally “revive” this image and the result is, among others, a film like this. Old demons that conmen like Elie Wiesel have nightmares about, rise up to shock the World and keep it aligned with the ZC mind. It is kind of like synching an iPod with an iTunes database: you attach one device to another and the host machine aligns the information on the guest device as it has programmed and then lets it go once program alignment is complete. Though, as seen in society, the roles are actually reversed: the Jew mind is the iPod that is attempting to put its contents into the larger body that is Society. Luckily society has a cure for this parasitical Jew umbilical: Nobility and Aryanism.

The SS in the film are molded to fit a basic movie monster archetype: the monster that guards a treasure. The protagonists of the film only encounter the zombies after opening a little box of treasure and after a they hear an ominously told story about the Schutzstaffel unit that was assigned to this area in the early 1940s. Thus, some of the most noble men to ever wear uniform and fight for a cause have been reduced to greedy little murdering and thieving beasts. For the Aryanist, this film may very well be amusing, but that’s due to how absurd it is. Once again, I draw a parallel with the Wolfenstein franchise, this movie is simply a Jew nightmare that has been projected onto the movie goers of the world.

There is however, a quite clever aspect to the film. A little bit of political engineering. Seeing how the ZC has linked Iran to their favorite boogeyman, they are, in a way, continuing that line of propaganda here. Note the setting and the antagonists of the film: a wild and vast landscape with elusive phantom-like monsters. What does that resemble other than the zombies in this movie? Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, for one. On a subliminal level that definitely seems to be the case. The mysterious hiker who tells the main characters of what happened in the area during WW2, speaks of it as a legend, something that no one really knows for sure, but many people fear. As far as information about Al-Qaeda is concerned, that’s the kind of thing that most people know. However, Al-Qaeda was created by the American CIA with the intention of fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan, yet now American news media, which is just a ZC puppet, paints them as Middle East born psychopaths that hate America due to Islam being a violent religion. This type of falsification can also be seen with the SS: It was the most ethnically diverse military outfit in history, but has been repeatedly shown as just a bunch of white racists from Germany adhering an inherently violent philosophy. Through the rational lens and with an intuitive mind, both demonized groups are much different that ZC would have us believe.

Another interesting thing is that among the weapons that the main characters use are a hammer and sickle. These make a very obvious appearance in the film's trailer. A little left wing boasting that certainly reflects the hippy nature of the main characters.

Lastly, if the hounds at ZC can only manage to repeat the same message over and over again by linking their current enemies to their fictional version of the Nazis, then I must say that they are running low on steam. Like Arthur Schopenhauer said, “…the religion of the Jews is entirely immanent and furnishes nothing but a mere war-cry with other nations.” Therefore they are stuck with constantly relating things to their fiction about the Nazis, which is, to this point, probably the most creative and for the Jew the most useful set of smoke and mirrors. And they will likely hold on to it until their bitter end, even long after the illusion has faded.

The Jewish concept of an enemy will likely always have a black uniform with Swastika and Totenkopf.

---------------------------
Dead Snow IMDb Page
---------------------------

August 25, 2010

ZC Weapons: Vilification and Demonization

The Zionist machine’s most active set of gears would have to be the one that spouts information. It is active everyday all day all the time. The information that this massive contraption produces is its own special brand of information we call “Zioninst Correctness” (ZC) and it completely engulfs the more known type of information known as “Political Correctness” (PC), which is meant to be spread by servile Gentiles. The corporate-owned news networks, cable channels, popular newspapers, and major entertainment producers are all subject to ZC. Entertainment most often manages to break PC for the simple reason of it being the easiest to excuse (“it’s just a movie”), but despite this, even most hard edge and darkly humored satire (eg. Fight Club) is still bound by the shackles of ZC.

The “correctness” in ZC is only “correct” in that it is subservient to the Zionist agenda and in agreement with their view of history. Political Correctness is just about not offending anyone. However, the truth behind the curtain is: not offending anyone whom ZC doesn’t want to offend. That is the hidden string.

Upon examining war films from the late 40s to the late 60s we can see whom the ZC puppeteers were ok with offending. Aside from rare, semi-honest portrayals, the soldiers of the Wehrmacht were mindless killing machines that were deservedly gunned down by heroic Americans. This increased dramatically with the birth of the action film genre that was basically an offshoot from war films. In order to make things just a bit more exciting, the filmmakers took creative license and effectively departed from reality. This was the start of all the action film cliches we know so well: guns that don’t run empty, badguys who can’t aim, exaggerated explosions and physics, and so on.

After the Germans become too much of a retread, it was by the 1970s that some new groups started to also appear as “the bad guys.” These included Soviet and Vietnamese Communists as well as Arab Terrorists. The first two groups were just convenient propaganda for the American side of the Cold War. Notice that after the Cold War ended, so did the action films exploiting it for the most part. However, the portrayal of Arabs was part of a scheme already in place long before, but now there was fresh wood for the fire, so to speak.

The following documentary goes into detail about the portrayal of Arabs and Muslims in US cinema. It was first a book by the narrator, Dr. Jack Shaheen, before being made into this short documentary film that was only released online as far as I know. Note the section on the production company called Cannon starting at the 23 min mark and the part on the film Rules of Engagement.

DOCUMENTARY: REEL BAD ARABS

The documentary makes many good points, even some against Zionist crime, but seeing that it was so far from the mainstream and does its little mandatory share of comparing National Socialists to evil, it was most definitely under the reins of ZC. But still, only truly intuitive viewers managed to find it and see it when it first came out, while most just ate up the daily cable news bulletins.

This brings me to the main point here, the ZC weapons of Vilification and Demonization. These are essentially increments along the ZC-hate-meter. Vilification is the first stage; it is achieved by repeated negative and/or antagonistic portrayals of a group. Once the association of a group with villainy becomes automatic and second nature from an audience, the conditioning has worked. Demonization works the same way, but the demonized subject is only shown as an antagonist (villains may be shown as protagnist anti-heroes such as MacBeth or Scarface) and they are almost always responsible for premeditating some awful crime that their villainous henchmen go on and carry out.

Can the reader guess to whom I might be referring?

Of course… who else, but Adolf Hitler. The man has repeatedly been portrayed in a way best summed up as “the incarnation of absolute evil” - a phrase that appeared in this TIME magazine article by Elie Wiesel. A very similar phrase describing Hitler was used in the game Wolfenstein 3D where the player destroys a very cartoon looking version of Hitler at the end of Episode 3. More on this highly influential game coming up in a later post. The first time Hitler was shown in a German film played by an actual actor (as opposed to stock footage or implied prescence) was in the 2004 film Der Untergang. However, even this dramatic and very detailed reenactment of Hitler’s last days succumbs to common myth and ZC: the Soviet war crimes in Berlin were ignored and the “six million figure" is reiterated at the end despite not having anything to do with the film’s story. Interestingly, the only numbers given at the end are 50 million (as "total dead during WW2") and 6 million (as "exterminated Jews"), yet the other groups who suffered don’t seem to be worth mentioning. Seeing that the film is about Germany's defeat from the German point of view, why not mention how many Germans died? Because that would be a “heresy.” Demonization carries the “heresy virus.” Meaning, any positive notion that someone gives about a “demon” makes them a “heretic” and a more-than-likely victim of character assassination, or as they used to do in the medieval times, burning the stake, or as the story of Christ goes, public crucifixion. In fact, “public crucifixion” is a phrase sometimes used to mean “character assassination.”

Now, why do the Jews unleash the ZC Hounds whenever their worldview is perceived by them to be threatened? Simply because the myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism as the narrator states in the documentary Who Brought the Slaves to America?

Here are slight elaborations from two famous minds:

“In the Aryan mind no religion can ever be imagined unless it embodies the conviction that life in some form or other will continue after death. As a matter of fact, the Talmud is not a book that lays down principles according to which the individual should prepare for the life to come. It only furnishes rules for a practical and convenient life in this world.” ~Adolf Hitler

“While all other religions endeavor to explain to the people by symbols the metaphysical significance of life, the religion of the Jews is entirely immanent and furnishes nothing but a mere war-cry in the struggle with other nations.” ~Arthur Schopenhauer

The Jewish mind is completely empirical and that is why they fabricate demons in this world from the likeness of their opponents and sanctify their fallen kin and make demi-gods of their martyrs before arrogantly projecting these delusions unto all. Like all inhabitants of this Earth, they also have this need for the metaphysical, but cannot (or choose not to) break out from their Talmudic prison; like a pitiful child too afraid or too stubborn to be independent in the world beyond home. Gentiles are their prisoners, their herd, either bought out or successfully connived into being goys.

We Aryans know that the human mind cannot live healthily as such and thus we explore the Greater and the Metaphysical with eagerness, but without forcing our subjective viewpoints onto others.

“Belief is a matter for each one to resolve in the light of his own conscience.” ~Rudolf Hess