Perceiving Aryanism and National Socialism

I can imagine that one day long ago when a system of mathematics, that eventually became one of Persia's greatest achievements in the form of algebra, started to play a key role in various transactions and this made certain sneaky merchants angry as it is harder to lie with numbers than it is with simple sleight of hand. Perhaps many of these dishonest merchants saw the logic of mathematics as "evil" since their schemes were now easily disprovable.

An analogous situation occurred in Germany when Adolf Hitler rose to power and very quickly started to push out all the Jewish schemes from the economy. Hence, National Socialism has been branded as "evil," since it caused trade, culture and society in Germany to be truly of the people and by the people thanks to its revolutionary new system. Those who did not wish to participate in, as well as those who sought to subvert, the new order were detained and set on course to be re-educated in camps. Hitler knew the dangers of subversion as it was such actions that caused the German defeat in the First World War... a war during which not one shell impacted German home territory. Marxist organized strikes, engineered class conflict, crafted hate of the intelligentsia and ethnic groups in addition to other subversions caused rampant chaos in Germany and in the newly created eastern nations of Czechoslovakia and Poland - strife in the Sudetenland and uprisings in Silesia as people felt displaced or left out from where they wished to be. No doubt that the sloppy Treaty of Versailles was meant to cause all of this. If it wasn't proven before, it was proven now - the masses are asses.

Enter Adolf Hitler. He had been carefully watching events unfold since his first sojourn as a student in Vienna - the futility of the parliamentary system, the dishonesty of the Press, the decaying of culture all at the hands of puppeteers who relished in chaos amongst the Goyim for it allowed them to implement their own selfish solutions and appear to be like geniuses and saviors - a perfectly fitting solution for the Jewish ego.

He saw what needed to be done

Out of chaos cannot come an order, but rather an order must be made from the chaos, for the chaos was Germany herself. Hitler wasn't seeking to advance the country, but first revert it back to a stage from which it can successfully advance - he believed in the Original Nobility of the Germans.

However, he also displayed a belief in the Nobility of other nations, namely the Slavs, who at the time were a great nuisance to Germany. Russia was overrun by Judeo-Marxists, the Czechs and Poles were aggressive about their new borders and the regions from Pomerania down to the Sudetenland saw ethnic strife, but most critically, the Soviets had already launched a war, barely after the conclusion of the giant preceding one. The Bolshevik onslaught was pushed back by the Poles after going as far as the outskirts of Warsaw. From this the Poles saw the USSR as their enemy, but also, in one of their greatest blunders, didn't see their German ally who had put forth conditions for the co-existence of Poland (as well as the Czechoslovak state) next to Germany as a joint buffer against Judeo-Bolshevik terror. The wise Hitler recognized his nation's real enemy and the enemy of all nations of men: it was the Jew who out of the chaos of the Great War was still busy creating more and more chaos on all fronts - social, geopolitical, economic.

The sleight of hand of the ancient dishonest merchant had grown to horrific proportions. The ancient herder's manipulative tactics had adapted into an intimidating and complex force.

Adolf Hitler didn't back down in cowardice of it all, he wasn't baffled into fear by the sheer scope of it, he wasn't selfish and thus didn't keep the solution to himself for his own gain.

THE ANSWER

"I have no hesitation in saying that in those men who seek to-day to embroil the patriotic movement in religious quarrels I see worse enemies of my country than the international communists are." ~Adolf Hitler

It applies to every country and international relations.

Revert the mess of society back to this:

Thus, making it possible to progress forward to this:

The key perception that we must see is that National Socialism is as German as Algebra is Persian or Geometry is Greek. Each has its source and will forever be known as hailing from there, but the applicability of each is so universal that it should be absolute standard. Algebra and Geometry are standards, however, National Socialism is not. Algebra's application, though, has been corrupted by the Jew who is at the ridiculous point of pulling numbers out of thin air, or simply typing them into a digital interface, so as to push forward his false transactions - it's the same old lying merchant and manipulative herder at work.

The result:

Confinement

Aryanist solution and continuation of Hitler's Kampf:

FREEDOM

"The Nazis" as a Showpiece

Recently, I have covered historical white washing propaganda and Allied boasting by looking at three films about World War II. However, this propaganda technique is actually more prevalent on the peripheries of the media/information sphere. There are actually many more films that merely reference the Nazis than are actually about them specifically. Kamerad Elysium made an interesting point in a comment on my Battle of Britain article:

"The West generally, but particularly the Anglosphere, and to a lesser degree Russia, made 'the Nazis' an integral part of the national mythos, becoming even more important than any other myths surrounding the nations' histories. It is for this reason that today we see 'the Nazis' and NS Germany as merely the context of the storytelling of the West. It is only a reference point to demonstrate the victor's moral superiority and vision for a liberal future for the world. I believe this is why NS Germany has been stripped of its place as a historical period to become something of a showpiece; like the Romans reenacting their victories against Thracians, Gauls, Germans, etc., in gladiatorial contests. Increasingly, especially since the focus on Israel and the Middle East has been important to foreign policy in the eyes of the public, 'the Nazis' have come to form THE pivotal reference point for Westerners."

~Elysium

The "Nazis as a showpiece" idea can be seen practically everywhere, it is so prevalent that people by now take it for granted. Remember the "Soup Nazi" from the show Seinfeld? A stubborn restaurant owner refuses to sell Jerry Seinfeld soup after the two of them have a misunderstanding about what comes with the order. The Jew Seinfeld promptly starts to call the man "the Soup Nazi" and this is an example of some of the most potent ZC Propaganda: it is degrades National Socialism to the point of ridiculousness. Jews have been doing this on a regular basis. Note: the linked article contains much foul language, thus it ironically works for the Jews despite having information that also accurately criticizes Zionism. The end result is "plus one, minus one, back to nil." No effect.

The Blitz Again
The same type of deal can be seen in the opening to the film version of Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. For some odd reason, the film starts with a whole scene of the Luftwaffe bombing London! This is indeed very odd, since in the source material, there is only a brief mention in passing of "air raids" and the story as C.S. Lewis wrote it starts with the main characters arriving at their countryside sanctuary.

The film version is just pure sensationalism that reinforces all of the common ZC approved myths about the Battle of Britain. There is ominous music, men speaking a language that most children watching would not understand, and just as the bombardier pulls the switch to drop the bombs, the shot cuts to an external of the bombers and we get a quick, almost semi-subliminal, glimpse of a swastika on a bomber's tailfin as it flies by. Then, in a quick shot-reverse shot combo we see the bombs fall and impact the city below. Only after this brief scene, that is utterly pointless within the film, do we first see the main characters.

Given the focus of the whole story, the London Blitz should have been a tiny part in the background, mentioned in passing at the film's start. However, the big film studio just couldn't resist showing a scene with ominous music, a flight of grey planes and the symbol of "absolute evil" to set the mood. The story then goes on to a fantasy world with a good vs. evil motif and we can bet that young viewers will make the appropriate mental association of what "real evil" is. The whole point of the first scene is to continue the subversion that Allied and Soviet propaganda began in the early 1940s. Or probably even earlier than that, after all, Judea did declare war on Germany in 1933.

The message from Hollywood is: "Hey kids! We're going to show you a fantasy epic about good and evil, but first, we must remind the Germans in our audience of what their nation did in 1940."

Kids will eat this hogwash up without knowing better, and should they ask any questions, their long since deluded parents and teachers will likely just confirm all the Zionist mythos for them. This even goes for German kids who would understand the non-subtitled dialog, but likely not receive the proper historical clarification from an adult. Interestingly, it is probably those German kids that would ask about why there are Germans in that first scene and not in any of the others. Thus, the chessboard has been set up to deceive all, but especially them.

The Irony of "Conspiracy"

The word "conspiracy" is most often heard today as being on the fringes of the information sphere. This is largely due to the nature of what a conspiracy is, something deliberately not made public, however it is also a way to prove arguments wrong: "it's just a conspiracy theory."

Very odd then, that a film about the Sacred Cow of mainstream information, one that fully supports all of its absurdities, myths, fabrications and the like, all the while attempting to sell them off as perfectly feasible and even logical, is called Conspiracy. I am referring to the 2001 HBO production about what is commonly known as "the Wannsee Conference" where the "Final Solution" was said to have been concocted.

The very first frame of the film is the first oddity, it is the title card of the film. The letter "o" is also the wreath held by the Imperial Eagle on the NSDAP Emblem. My best guess is that the title "Nazi Conspiracy" would have sounded a bit lame, too much like pulp fiction, so they snuck in that notion with a small bit of graphics work. However, the thing that seals the deal with this film is the opening narration, which soon starts, and which states that "only one record of what was said and done here survives." Thus, within less than a minute the film admits to being highly speculative at best.

The next thing that happens is the third and final oddity, which is the entire rest of the film: the whole catalog of "evil Nazi" stereotypes. It is really quite amusing in a weird way. HBO is a major company and network, they hired some fine Shakespearean actors for this film and the production design is very good quality for a historical film; however all that is all just distraction from the sheer absurdity of what they talk about. You are supposed to be taken in by the dramatic performances so that you don't, by chance, happen to think that you could go and verify by yourself the information presented. The sights and wonders of good actors at work is supposed to be all that is required to convince viewers, and sadly, for the most part, it does.

NS Stereotypes
They were pretty unoriginal with them here. Adolf Eichmann, the man said to be responsible for scheduling all the trains to "death camps" as they are known by ZC, is shown to be a cold-faced, stingy bastard who is annoyed by the slightest mistake in order. We can see this right away as a kitchen worker drops some plates causing them to shatter. Immediately Eichmann barks in anger and orders that the cost of damage be taken from the worker's next paycheck.

The saying, "Heil Hitler," is used ad nauseam as the arriving NSDAP officials greet each other. They shout it repeatedly despite being indoors and each time they whip out the accompanying salute. Literally, the lobby of the mansion feels like a parade ground during this scene.

The most ludicrous, and also the most generic, stereotype is the portrayal of Gerhard Klopfer, who was a slender man, but in this production he is portrayed by the quite obese Ian McNeice. The actor plays his role as a perverse, gluttonous slob and the film's speculative nature begins to partly fade and be replaced with the sense of "deliberately misleading." In fact, the here fictional Klopfer very much resembles the real Ariel Sharon who is a bigoted war criminal, albeit with an efficient public relations department that covers up his and his fellow Zionists' crimes against the Palestinians and other groups. The film's portrayal of Reinhard Heydrich also bears a key element of ZC Propaganda - in the film Heydrich is shown as being blonde and blue eyed, the so called "Aryan ideal" of the Third Reich. The real Heydrich was blue eyed, but he wasn't blonde as many readily available colorized photos of him show. Even from the black and white photos we can see that his hair appears as too dark to have been blonde.

Racism and Bigotry
In compliance with ZC, the film portrays the officials meeting as quite racist. This comes in the form of intermittent spouts of bigotry. Many of these are anti-Polish. I found this odd, since the National Socialists of Germany were said to have hated everybody (but especially the Jews) so why do they seem to insult the Poles more than other groups? The answer is a simple Jewish manipulation. Poland had a large Jewish population and many Poles were put into the internment camps along with Jews where they suffered from the same typhus epidemic, many of them dying. Thus, when the Zionists pitched the "6,000,000 figure" the Poles were among their easiest to lure goys. The Jew had nestled his way into winning sympathy for fictional atrocities. The film's dialog just continues that myth: "You Poles should hate the Germans just as much as we do since they were trying to kill you too." To keep this myth in line, stories of dedicated soldiers like Herbert Kaminski and Gerhard Michalski are totally ignored in the mainstream sphere. Both men were ace pilots in the Luftwaffe and identified as Germans, but their names clearly show them to be of mixed extraction, thus exposing "German racial mania" as fiction. In a great irony, practically all of this German anti-Slavic bias is actually a Jewish creation; a false flag to gain support for policies and campaigns. I, as an ethnic Slav born in Poland, have never been discriminated against by Germans despite having come into contact with many over the years. I have, however, been insulted on basis of heritage by Jews from Russia and they were the only group to have spit bigotry in my face. This is also in contrast to ethnic Russians who have never directed any such remarks toward me.

It is also worth noting that the Wehrmacht was incredibly diverse on an ethnic scale. Many times more so than the Allied and Soviet armed forces.

In the film, the Germans at the table discuss all sorts of ways to isolate Jews and prevent them from mixing with ethnic Germans. They rant about statistics and fractions and "preserving race" and "not polluting blood" and basically everything that the Jews condone and actually do themselves today! They invented the Nazi myth to downplay the Israeli reality.

Excerpt from this IHR interview with General Otto Ernst Remer:

IHR: Is it true that the Germans referred to the Russians as "subhumans?"

Remer: Nonsense! The Russians are human beings just like everyone else.

Your question, whether we called the Russians "subhumans," is nonsense. We had a first-class relationship with the Russian people. The only exception, which was a problem we dealt with, was with the Soviet Commissars, who were all Jews. These people stood behind the lines with machine guns, pushing the Russian soldiers into battle. And anyway, we made quick work of them. That was according to order. This was during a war for basic existence, an ideological war, when such a policy is simply taken for granted.

There was sometimes talk about the so-called Asian hordes, and ordinary soldiers sometimes spoke about subhumans, but such language was never officially used.

General Remer was a top ranking NS official who knew Adolf Hitler very well.

Now, some words from influential Jews:

"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
~Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 (NY Times, 2/28/1994, pg 1)

"The nation of Israel is pure and the Arabs are a nation of donkeys. They are an evil disaster, an evil devil, and a nasty affliction. The Arabs are donkeys and beasts. They want to take our girls. They are endowed with true filthiness. There is pure and there is impure and they are impure." ~Rabbi David Batzri, head of the Magen David Yeshiva in Jerusalem (Israeli newspaper Haaretz, 3/21/2006)

So there you have it. Thoughts on racism from a top NS official and from top Jewish Rabbis. Predictably, the racism comes from the Jews.

The Big Deal
As with any "Holocaust" movie, the big thing here is the "gas chambers." These are also the film's biggest gamble, since if one manages to disprove this issue, then the whole films goes from highly speculative to definitely false.

Soon after the fictional film Nazis finish with their obligatory racist ranting, the "logical" conclusion of the evil Nazi mind is reached: extermination. This is ZC's key tool of attack in this film. First, they provide a slightly more sophisticated surface picture of the NS personnel, however the core of film's message it is just the same thing as Wolfenstein 3D. It is a clever move so as to make the demonization of the Nazi ideas and not the Nazis themselves. The more plausible than usual surface of this presentation makes for a greater chance that the audience will swallow the underlying falsehoods. Even if these are taken in subliminally, the job of the film to deceive is done.

Additionally, the film also says that "it is not the Germans that are bad, just Nazis who could potentially be of any ethnicity." It is a subtle distinction, more of a grey area really, but in demonizing ideas and not people, ZC effectively broadens its range of attack, yet hones its accuracy as well. For the most part, the guilt tripping of Germans is only a part of their propaganda, the biggest part is guilt tripping anyone who dares to think positively about National Socialism.

The irony is that in doing so, we can see that ZC fears that more and more people are realizing that National Socialism is not just a German thing. This means that they have effectively acknowledged the universal applicability of NS! Now, people just have to see through the morbid Jewish fiction, which comes next.

In the film, Eichmann states that with the building of a new camp at a location called Auschwitz, they will be able to kill 2,500 Jews per hour and 60,000 Jews per day. Many of the members at the meeting react in shock, except for the blonde, blue eyed fictional Heydrich who smiles coldly. The figures amount to just over 21,000,000 dead per year, according to the film. The shock is, of course, a positive and happy surprise as the fictional Nazis then proudly say that it will be like an assembly line to which Heydrich responds that "the clever Americans have taught us that one!" This particular line is nothing other than a stab at Henry Ford who wrote The International Jew and distributed The Protocols of the Elders of Zion after he saw how much of the text was reflecting what was really happening in the World at the time.

The film's discussion about gas chambers amounts to just sneering and throwing big numbers around, which is effectively just sensationalist entertainment and shock value. One should find it odd that the men in the film don't discuss where they'll get the equipment and how they'll construct it. They go into much detail about many other things, like the aforementioned racial issues, yet this key aspect of the film is totally ignored. It is as if they say: "I got it! Gas Chambers!" The End. The reason for this is quite simple once one has found where to look.

These photos are a start:

Note the caption: it's in German.

A German company's advertisement for industrial gas chambers:

Yes, that is an actual advertisement for a German company's product, which makes it something that Adolf Hitler would have had unlimited access to if he wanted. This is particularly true after Germany went into "Total War" with all of the country's production geared for war efforts, which supposedly included a "war on the Jews." Yet, never in any "Holocaust" movie do we see any of these REAL GAS CHAMBERS. Nor are they in any of the camps. I have been to Auschwitz and Majdanek and nothing of the sort pictured above can be seen there. "Holocaust Denial" is NOT the refusal to admit a painful truth, but the refusal to accept a lie.

Historian Friedrich Berg has compiled an excellent online library of information about this and other subjects from the Second World War. The above images are from his site.

One should also note this article that acknowledges that the "gas chambers" were built after the war under Soviet supervision (read: gun-point).

With all this in mind we can see the greatest irony at play here: it is the film itself that is the "conspiracy."

Let's take a look at the meaning of that word, it is defined as such:

con·spir·a·cy
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies

1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a conspiracy of wind and tide that devastated coastal areas.

This film production perfectly fits with #1 - it is wrongful and subversive. The filmmakers and the Allied and Soviet propagandists (with many Jewish racists on both sides) are #2. The Allied and Soviets are all guilty of #3 - accomplish a legal purpose (prosecution) through illegal action (with fabrication and falsehood). This process continues today with films like this that justify the previous lies. Lastly, these actions, and Jewish actions today, are most certainly a "sinister design" - they know that they are wrong and that is why they fear revisionist investigation. That is why the "Holocaust" is protected by law, because it cannot stand by itself, it needs a witch hunt to frighten people into believing it.

"As long as people believe in absurdities then they will continue to commit atrocities." ~Voltaire

Certainly we can see as that being the case with Israel, the self-proclaimed Jewish state, in today's world. Dropping illegal chemical weapons, in the form of white phosphorus, on innocents. Detaining people without trial. Lobbying their biggest guard dog, the USA, to shelter them from all international criticism and prosecution.

Conclusion
The film's epilogue is rather interesting in that it states that many of the men were released for "lack of evidence." This, once again, shows that the film is speculation for if solid evidence did in fact exist about the matters said to have been discussed here, then all involved would have been arrested and jailed if not executed. However, even after the supposed "one record" was found in 1947 (by that point Germany had been under occupation for 2 years by the Allies and Soviets) nothing changed in the men's fates. For one, Klopfer lived and worked freely until 1987!

There is an interesting anecdote at the end that Kritzinger tells to Heydrich: it's the story of a young man who detests his father so much, that when eventually the man dies, the son breaks down in tears, because his life is now empty of all purpose after having directed all of his energies into despising his father. This is Kritzinger's warning about the hatred that Heydrich and the Nazis feel toward the Jews. The brief story amounts to nothing more than yet another short chapter in Judeo-arrogance. The Jews cannot help, but place themselves in the center of everything. The study of World War 2 will soon simply be reduced to the sentence, "The time when 6,000,000 Jews were gassed." National Socialism will become, "The belief that all Jews should be killed via gassing." Etc, etc...

It is rather pathetic, but a rather perfect example of the self-centered nature of the Jewish mind, the morbidity of its beliefs, the aridity of its ideals and the parasitic persuasion that affects non-Jews and gets them to spread the Jews' lies. And it all goes back to the herder archetype.

A related essay HERE as well as a close analysis of the Wannsee Conference Protocol HERE.

Tunnel Vision over at the Occidental Observer

Avatar, James Cameron's feel-good adventure story is wholly unoriginal on the Storytelling Front, but very imaginative in the visual department. Since it was a such a huge production with the highest budget thus far allotted for a movie project and the biggest box office intake as of this date with some $2.5 billion in Worldwide earnings, it speaks a good deal about what today's audience likes: elaborate sights and sounds with simplistic story arcs.

The BS Gentiles at The Occidental Observer reviewed this film and that was really just a continuation of their fixation on white race preservation as can be read in this review of the blockbuster film. Replace "white" with "Jew" and you'll have a typically racist, rabbi written op-ed.

In the article, Kevin MacDonald writes: 

"So, in a nutshell, Whites from Earth are colonizing another planet whose indigenous wonderful hominids with primitive technology but great butts and neural connections to plants and animals, are in the way of The Company which wants its precious mineral called Unobtainium. (This was the only in joke in the movie I think.) There are a couple of social workers trying to get the natives to move and save Precious Life. They are of course outmaneuvered by the capitalists who want their unobtainium and start to bulldoze the magic forest."

If all MacDonald can observe about this film is that certain white characters are greedy and unpleasant, than he is missing much of point due to his skin-pigmentation fixation. He also misses the satire on Judeo-economics... "unobtanium" is quite the way to put it.

In the film, there are mixed characters on both sides. Good humans aren't all white and neither are the evil humans. Though, the commander of the mercenary unit deployed to protect The Company is white, as is the main representative of the evil corporation, and it is from these two bits that MacDonald's main concern springs: evil white people. Odd that a professor of psychology would evaluate character's based on their skin-color. How about delving into their... *ahem* ....psychology? Meaning, looking at the characters' intentions, goals, means to achieve these things, and the like. From this we can see that the commander and the corporate officer are slimy, arrogant bastards and deserve no sympathy from noble people.

Practically all of the main Zionists in Israel have light skin that could be called "white," so does this mean that MacDonald sympathizes with those war criminals? And does he find any news report that points out Israeli criminality as offensive, since it criticizes "white" people? It would seem so. MacDonald decidedly prefers the shallow end of the pool. His allegiance to his "white" skin is like the Jews' allegiance to the Law of the Rabbis - what's good for (my group's name here) is good in all senses of the word.

More from MacDonald's article:

"So, the Good pseudo-native , like in The Last Samurai, goes native and war is begun with the CapitalistImperialistWhitePigs. Spectacular battle scenes with the Good natives mounted on the backs of flying Teradactyl like birds beating the White Man’s machines. As in Tarzan movies, the animals also come to the aid of the natives, after having sensed that the White Man is a greater danger.

In the battle, the chief Bad Guy is a jarhead (Marines) colonel who wants to kill all the Good Natives. Blue eyes and a very White Marine, he of course, is beaten by bows and arrows and big scary animals (a la Tarzan). As he is about to kill our pseudo-native hero, who has of course betrayed the mission of The Company, the colonel yells, “How does it feel to be a race traitor?” With that, two arrows from the love-interest native female sink into his chest."

MacDonald's race-themed defensive posture is virtually identical the ever-apologetic Jew, who will always find a way to mask or excuse his deeds - from cries of "anti-Semitism" and "blood libel" to the quintessential racist attitude of "We're the Chosen People." The BS Gentiles at TOO simply substitute "White" for "Jew." In their eyes, criticizing whites is "anti-White" or maybe "anti-Occidentalism."

By the time the reader reaches this part of the article, it comes as no surprise that MacDonald chose to end his piece with the most overt racism - a saving the "best" for last sort of thing via the BS Gentile mindset.

"Like Bladerunner’s replicants, the natives are more human than homo sapiens — Whites that is. The few other folks who help the natives are Earthlings — Blacks and browns, who of course, side with the natives. They recognize a brother when they see one."

Oh boy. Quite the absurdity, in addition to the racism.

At no point in the film is it so bluntly said that the Na'vi (the "natives" from Avatar) are "more human" than the humans. What is said, via the story, is that they are less overcome by greed and material desire. This makes them more noble and thus they are the story's good-guys.

"The material interest of mankind can prosper only in the
shade of the heroic virtues. The moment they become the primary considerations of life they wreck the basis of their own existence." ~Adolf Hitler

The human mission on planet Pandora is primarily concerned with material interests, while the Na'vi are heroically defending their homeland. That is why the humans and their corporation loses. However, by the end, a few humans, the noblest stock, joins the Na'vi. They do this to pursue ideals and probably didn't consider "race." In fact, in the film, it is only the bigoted Gentiles that bring up "race" and such terms. They cannot see past the end of their nose.

I do agree with MacDonald that Avatar paints a pessimistic portrait of humans, however, unlike him, I am not at all surprised. Just look at the day's news, mainstream source or not: there's violence, treachery, greed and hate that comes from people of all colors. Oddly, since MacDonald is so Euro-centric, he only sees the media point out evil white men and takes offense to this. That sort of arrogance and ignorance hand-in-hand is very Jewish.

The fact is, all peoples suffer and all peoples are to blame. The state of the World is decayed, decadent and filled with drudgery. The popular films that come out simply reflect this. Complaining about such a film is like complaining to a mirror for showing you a scar on your face - it's not the mirror's fault! You did something that gave you a scar and the complaints won't help heal it.

"Man has become great through perpetual struggle." ~Adolf Hitler

And he can become great again, but this means primarily proactive effort. This means seeing your own faults in addition to those of others, and this is something the Gentiles lack.

Taking a look at this essay is a good start for them to steadily veer away from simplistic bigotry and tunnel vision.

Alternate version of the rebuttal HERE

On Talmudic Methods as Tactics: Occidental Observer

The Boromir Syndrome (BS) is rampant over at The Accidentally Talmudic Observer. They recently published this article in effort to seem sound on the issue of violence. Little do they know, they are using definitions from history's most nefarious book and thus continue to spin in their goy wheel.

On Violence as a tactic
By Kevin MacDonald

A correspondent concerned about the connotations of some of the commentary on this site sent the following:

Some patriots, especially the young, become frustrated and angry and want to take direct action. That is understandable because we are facing a life-and-death threat to our national existence and our political class is demonstrably failing to show leadership; indeed, major elements are leading the attack on the American people. But it is both morally wrong and tactically counterproductive to advocate or practice violence.

SoE: So "taking direct action" and "advocating or practicing violence" are the same thing? If you are a BS Gentile than they sure seem to be! That illusion is part of the Paradigm Prison, which is ZC approved definitions for everything. Going by them will never lead to progress, they are designed to be ineffective.

The mentioning of "patriots" and "threats to our national existence" and other assorted tribalist vocabulary makes the failure of this article all the more plain. Failure when dealing with Zionists that is. Technically, the goal of this article is to present Babel, and in that, it succeeds.

Reasons:

Moral.
The rule of law is critical for the maintenance of civilization. In many ways, it IS civilization. We might not like some of those laws but unless we limit our protest to legal means, we contribute to the slide to barbarity that has done so much harm.

SoE: Again, they are trapped in the Paradigm Prison. The Aryan State (the true remedy for Jewish corruption) does not use the law as a "maintenance of civilization," but rather to progress civilization towards an ideal. Law, by itself, is in no way the actual civilization. By appealing to the corrupt laws that have allowed Zionist crime, how does MacDonald hope to stop it? Maybe next he'll recommend that an organized crime syndicate aide the police in catching a big time mobster, who may or may not be their boss.

Tactical.
Violence or its advocacy would allow our enemies to call down the full power of the state apparatus upon us. Even if we were strong and had a chance to win elections, it would be fatal to become outlaws. Many many Whites would feel compelled to withdraw their support. A movement that had taken decades to build would be dismantled overnight, its assets liquidated, its leaders jailed. And even if violence had a good chance of accelerating victory, going down that path would soil the vision of our New America. We want the freedom we seek to last; we want to set an example to other Western peoples and to other civilizations that will make our liberation permanent by setting it within a compatible international order. We can only do that by appealing to the highest personalities, to the natural aristocracy of other countries. Only then will they gain the moral courage to act in their people’s interests. We can only do that by being demonstrably decent, by being the sort of people they want to be. This is one of the practical implication of being a cultural Christian.

SoE: The bold faced emphasis (added by me) is MacDonald's solution. Close, but no cigar, MacDonald. "Aristocracy" not only has elitist and un-Aryan connotation, but the current ruling classes, to which MacDonald suggests that his readers appeal to in order to find a solution, are the ones most likely to be most corrupted by the current system. MacDonald does not offer radicalism (the Aryanist definition) and seek allies outside of the current establishment, thus the ones most likely to have true Noble motivation.

The only thing that MacDonald gets right is by saying that those who want to enact change should be decent, but he doesn't lay out how they can also be effective and thus this is another TOO dead end.

Programming Language

"Ctrl-Alt-Delete" is Restart, not Revolution.

Observations Around Society

Popular culture is in a pretty low state these days. Western culture has become driven by promise of plenty via little to no effort. Indulgence has become a good thing, as long as a worker doesn't neglect their responsibilities more than the relativist boss allows; this inevitably leads to cutting corners in effort all the while expecting more in return for the work performed. These indulgent desires spill over even more in social life as I have seen during my socially bizarre journey through college. Instead of discussing things like literature, history, politics, our studies or anything mentally stimulating, the point of social activity was inebriation in its highly limited number of forms. By now it has gone so far that most people take these absurdities as normal. It is a dangerous mix of decadence and accepting an overarching fate.

Gizmos are also a big thing today - a small portable phone with a camera and internet access is, by today's standards, simply a "cell phone." Added to the fact that most of these devices even have a multitude of "applications." One of these "apps" (people don't even say whole words these days) was called "The Lightsaber Application" and the whole thing was a simple display of the famous Star Wars prop that made the associated sounds as you move the phone around. Pointless - a goy bisciut - but people go nuts for these things.

My cell phone camera, which has spent a great deal of time being perfectly useless, or one could say "dormant," up until fairly recently when I decided to put it to use by noting several observations around society.

PHOTO 1
This appears to be an ad for the fast food chain McDonald's that tries to tap into the "more is better" craze. The man looks sad that he is only getting a small chocolate dessert with water, instead of a gargantuan portion of culinary chemistry in both solid and liquid form.

On slightly closer inspection you can see that it is actually a satire on McDonald's. Note the smaller print (click image for larger version) that outlines the dangers of consuming fast food, yet it does it within the confines of the ad, which grinds not only against McDonald's, but also against the elusive quality of corporate advertising. It also looks like the text of "possible side effects" that prescription medicine commercials have: while showing happy people the narrator quickly reads off a list of possible side effects and if written out, they may very well be as long that the ones listed here.

PHOTO 2
Next we have a joke about the absurdity of too much free choice or uninformed free choice.

This is part of the whole "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" debate. The details of said debate are beyond the scope of this essay, but it is worth noting that absurdity is gripping an ever firmer hold on our society. The obsession of "rights" and "free choice" is one such thing as this cartoon demonstrates. Citizens of an Aryan State do not have "certain inalienable rights" as the whole concept of "right" is un-Aryan. Rather, citizens of an Aryan State have certain unassigned, yet always active, duties. Ensuring that the younger generation has plenty of chances to bloom with a solid education is one of them. When that is done with rationalism, the younger generation will have much free choice and, critically, their options will not be as ridiculous as the ones pictured above. The Historic Aryan Farmer lets his crops grow as they please, but first ensures the soil is fertile for them to do so.

PHOTO 3
A humorous take on the Arizona immigration issue. There is an NS joke in there, but I think that only reinforces a truth that most Americans are not aware of (due to corrupt education) or one that they just simply deny.

The power of an astute message is awesome.

PHOTO 4
A political cartoon that shows the nature of Judaic selfishness.

The black splotch over the Goldman-Sachs banksters looks like a simple space-filler for the composition, but to me it looks like a monstrous belch of pollution and it appropriately radiates from Lloyd Blankfein's rotten corpus.

PHOTO 5
This is largely self-explanatory.

It is also largely true. Click to read text in larger version.

PHOTO 6
Very interesting image here. Look carefully.

Some very interesting details here. First off, Adolf Hitler, apparently, wasn't the worst tyrant of them all. The death tally attributed to each of these leaders has drifted to and fro and varied from source to source, but this only points out the quality of the mainstream. I have seen 20 million next to Stalin before. For Mao, this is quite low as I have usually seen him "awarded" with 50 to 70 million. However, the 15 million by Hitler is quite strange. The official "holocaust" narrative comes to a total of 6 million. The total dead during WW2 is commonly said to be 50 million, and Hitler has been blamed for starting the war, so why not just make him the worst of the three leaders here? Probably, because that is so ridiculous that it cannot even make it into the mainstream. Thus, Hitler is left with just 6 million, but then he would look fairly tame next to the others, so the cartoonist just multiplied by... er, 2.5... yeah.

What is also interesting is the shape of each head. Note the roughly pyramid shape, which could possibly refer to the "evil power pyramid" as seen on the back of the US Dollar Bill. Each leader's two eyes would be below the ominous all seeing eye at the pyramid's apex. As they are drawn this "third eye" seems to be in their brains - evil men thinking up evil schemes. Stanley Kubrick would approve of this view and showed many ominously themed pyramid compositions (particularly in A Clockwork Orange) and also equated the NS movement to absolute evil (even in the same movie).

Though, as we have seen, the false images are such cartoons.

NOW BEST FOR LAST

PHOTO 7
There was a large tack board that I passed one day and saw a very interesting detail. The frame of the board was lined with 4 identical strips that has a design of various international flags. Coincidentally (or perhaps not) the German flag and the Israeli flag were next to one another. There was also a tiny and precise bit of vandalism that was quite consistent. The top strip was covered with announcements and photos, thus mostly obscured. However, the other three were very visible. I photographed a detail from each of those. Click image for larger version.

Ownage!

This was in the halls of a New York university and there are many Arabic students enrolled at this school who no doubt have expressed their feelings on a certain illegally occupied territory that is administered by criminals guilty of mass murder and actual blood libel.

Society, there is much in the details.

The Boromirs Among Us: Occidental Observer

Response to this 12/26/2010 article by Edmund Connelly in The Occidental Observer.

Connelly makes some accurate observations about Zionist crime that is intrinsically tied to the supremacist and hate perpetuating ideology of Judaism, but his article is only a brushing on the dirty surface and not an exposing of the rotten core.

Connelly begins by clearly pointing out that the United States should in no way consider Israel an allied nation and names the Lavon Affair (with a link to the Wikipedia article, nonetheless) as the reason. From reading about such an event we can assume that most truly inquisitive readers (as are those who veer away from mainstream information) will then go on to see that the Lavon Affair was but the start of an era of hidden Israeli aggression against the United States and the West.

Connelly then suggests that there is actually a far more constant and far more subtle war going on and that is one of "laying the mental threads." Citing several example of documentary works that have investigated the portrayal of Arabs (and all Muslims, really) in film, as well as referring to the 1998 movie The Siege, which is likely a part of this grand anti-Arab propaganda campaign, Connelly makes his point that Hollywood is actually a "Jewish fiefdom" that is working to manipulate all Americans into hating Arabs and Muslims.

Now, is Connelly genuinely concerned about the racism that is directed at these people? One would think so, but unfortunately Connelly then fumbles with the following contradiction:

"The issue is not really whether these images have a substantial element of truth. Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet these days to be terrorists."

And so, Connelly has not only spotted racist propaganda, but he has also eaten his fair share - he bought it hook, line and sinker!

First off, Connelly is going by the ZC prescribed definition of terrorist, which essentially means "angry looking Muslim." If we look at the word "terrorist" with a bit of rationalism we can come to the simple conclusion that a "terrorist" is simply someone who frightens people. Fear of death is the most effective way to do this, thus they result to displays of large-scale violence and make sure that those casualty figures are well publicized. This definition fits a whole lot better with the Israeli Defense Forces than it does with a group of rebels who launch flimsy homemade rockets at their oppressors that have starved and occupied them since 1948. However, those oppressive criminals have a well oiled PR machine and media backing them up and shifting blame, thus Connelly should have said: "Muslims are indeed the most likely people on the planet to be shown as terrorists." This is the Zionists' most effective weapon of mass destruction.

Connelly seems to, more or less, acknowledge this fact in the article when he shows the 2008 film Taken and the popular television show 24 to be nothing more than Jewish manipulations to get Westerners to hate Muslims. This is, by and large, true: Taken had a Jewish screenwriter and 24, a Jewish producer. They were just doing their part to get Westerners to despise Muslims. So, Connelly is back to pointing out Jewish crimes and he even points out the sly inversion presented in Taken: the slave trade is actually more of a Jewish crime, than it is a Muslim one. He uses this story from the Jerusalem Post to point out a key aspect of Jewish racist double-standard: in Israel, slavery is legal if it involves non-Jews. The main victims are young Slavic women who are conned into going to Israel with bogus job prospects. Connelly also mentions that Jews, a disproportionately influential minority, seem to not mention themselves in the movies and stories that they produce.

Connelly then ends his article with a bit of xenophobia by saying that the film Taken "provides a useful function by again alerting Americans, French, and other Westerners to the risk posed by the presence of alien elements amongst us." He is back to buying the propaganda that the Jew never ceases to sell. Oddly, in the same paragraph he seems to scold many of the aforementioned Westerners for "worshipping" Jews and Israel.

In the end, Connelly's article is an uncoordinated blast off into the general right direction - he recognizes his enemy, but doesn't realize many of his potential allies. He also doesn't attack the core of Jewish thinking, but rather just presents empirical observations about how Jews manipulate the world - that fact that he doesn't attack Jewry on ideological ground is his article's great fault. Added to the fact is that he is, in effect, using Jewry's methods against Jewry, thus will never really change anything. Things are doomed to forever be done in the immoral and nefarious Talmudic way unless those very methods are destroyed.

Connelly is a fine example of the Boromir Syndrome - "Let's use the enemy's weapon against him!" That's like saying you don't agree with Israelite usury and then round up all your friends so as to out-compete the moneychangers. Even if you win, the Beast lives on in you.

Connelly also writes, "While terrorism is one clear risk, it is not the only one, as Taken shows." Again, not fully false, but not fully true. Even Boromir realized that Sauron must be destroyed, but he just didn't see the correct way how to do it. "Terrorism" is a problem, yes, but does Connelly see the bulk of it as a Jewish media created mirage and/or Israeli false flags? He mentions skepticism for the official 9/11 story and the Lavon Affair, yet at the same time he still seems to believe the official hogwash stories and "explanations" - Connelly sees Taken as propaganda, but then actually buys its Jewish message.

With the examples of Jewish double-standards that Connelly provides, it is really hard to grasp why he doesn't wrap up the article with the point that Judaism is fundamentally immoral. It is the oldest lie-to-get-ahead scheme in the World. He doesn't mention that Jews view all non-Jews as "goys" - an exploitable resource in the form of sentient beings. He opposes the Jew, yet he doesn't hit him where it will deal the most effective strike to the Jewish lies. From this, we can see that he is, in all probability, being led by the Jew and doesn't even know it.

---------------------------

A Spoke in the Goy Wheel
---------------------------

Alternate version of the rebuttal HERE

"He-Man" was a Nazi - Part II

I remember bits and pieces of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe from childhood. One of the first comic books that I remember owning was one with He-Man. The show was being re-run at that point and this re-airing must have not lasted for very long, as I did not remember too much of the show. However, I distinctly remember watching G.I. Joe, which had numerous toys, games, re-vamps, and made-for-TV movies, as well as an overblown Hollywood movie in the summer of 2009 as part of its franchise.

However, due to YouTube and the official He-Man channel there, I was able to rediscover this show and I must say that it is a real hidden gem amongst the piles of garbage that can be found in TV land. Not surprisingly, the show ran for only 130 or so episodes, while other programs that had no intention of providing good social messages and/or teaching about ethical positives, tend to go on for season after season. He-Man also had its share of short-lived re-incarnations, but none caught on as well as shows like The Simpsons or South Park, which were of much better quality when they first aired, but have steadily slipped down into a fester-pot of tired unoriginality and blatant scatological humor. The latter goes double for South Park that is best described as an "equal opportunity ridicule machine" - the creators of the show, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, just pick up on mainstream media hot-topics and ridicule them into the ground. Many of the people they tear to pieces probably deserve it, but that doesn't mean that the show serves any useful purpose. By now the show is pretty much the equivalent of a dog passing gas - it only matters for a second and only a few other dogs will ever bother to notice. Pretty much all of mainstream TV is deserving of this anti-accolade.

For now, enough ripping on the media, let's take a look at some of the first episodes of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe.

The Cosmic Comet - Skeletor attempts to use a magic comet against the good beings on Eternia. The job of stopping such a powerful force is too much for He-Man alone, so he seeks helps from an old wizard. The "evil comet" doesn't end up destroyed but paired with another magic comet and this stops it from wreaking havoc. This plot element is very interesting as it shows that He-Man and the good-guys on Eternia do not seek to destroy evil, but rather to ameliorate it. The magic comets, are perhaps more aptly described as some sort of celestial beings or life-forces, that have taken comet form. Skeletor attempts to use this power for evil, while He-Man for good. This doesn't mean reining in the comet-being, but rather letting it make its own choice, and once it sees that Skeletor is using it for his own ends, it stops serving him.

This episode is a good display of one of the show's major themes and over-arching conflicts: Honor - symbolized by He-Man - versus Dishonor - symbolized by Skeletor. He-Man uses his magic, namely his sword, to be able to directly deal with the enemy and he never initiates violence with it. On the other hand, Skeletor constantly schemes with magic to be able to get an upper hand and to avoid dealing directly with his enemies.

The Shaping Staff - Evil-Lyn, one of Skeletor's closest allies, uses a magic staff that can change someone's appearance in order to sneak her way into the Eternian Royal Palace. This is a very direct continuation of the scheming with magic theme. This plan also allows for the planting of a parasitic advisor as Evil-Lyn, posing as a traveling magician, makes King Randor disappear and reappear, but this was just a quick ruse to replace Randor with Beastman (another one of Skeletor's key allies) who is in the semblance of the King due to the staff's magic. This move is really a combination of the parasitic advisor and Manchurian candidate tactics.

In this episode, Skeletor also creates a being in the semblance of He-Man so as to fool the Eternians, which is just another parasite-placement tactic; they are literally the mainstay of Skeletor's battle with He-Man and Co. The creation of mindless servants to do his bidding also mirrors the golem from Jewish lore - it is an example of avoiding direct conflict by orchestrating puppets.

The Disappearing Act - The subversive tactics of Skeletor continue in this episode as he kidnaps Prince Adam and sets him as bait with the hope that He-Man will rescue him. Of course, Skeletor has no idea that Prince Adam is actually He-Man. Other than Adam, only Man-at-Arms, Orko and Cringer the Tiger know of this warrior alter-ego.

This episode demonstrates that without trustworthy allies, even the strong He-Man would not be able to effectively fight - camaraderie is essential for a Kampf to go forward and succeed. This notion also effectively makes He-Man antonymic to the Lone Wolf archetype that seems to be so popular in most superheroes - he is not arrogant, not a loner, nor does he project his eccentricities (when he is Prince Adam) - He-Man is pretty much the essence of honor, helping anyone and everyone without expecting anything in return. He possesses many traits that can be seen in the stories of Christ, Mohammed and Buddha.

Man-at-Arms (whose name is actually Duncan, but he goes by his title for the most part) is head of the Royal Palace guards. The plural of that title, Men-at-Arms, could be seen as a translation of "Schutzstaffel," which means "Protective Echelon" and the SS was set-up as a guard unit for an authoritative and militarist leader, Adolf Hitler. Note, Man-at-Arms's helmet design.

Freies Eternien!

He has two S shaped Bolts on either side of his helmet and the same type of helmet is worn by all Eternian Royal Palace Guards. The S-bolts often seem like one band that stretches around the back of the helmet, but in several close-ups Man-at-Arms can be seen looking down or turning around and this always reveals that it is actually two identical bolt shapes.

Diamond Ray of Disappearance - The ever scheming Skeletor has cooked up another plan to subversively take over the rule of Eternia. He has found the long lost gem of the episode's title that causes all who look into to it to be transported into some other dimension. Once again, this is all to avoid direct engagement with his the Noble Eternians. In one scene of this episode, Skeletor even brings rocks to life and they take a humanoid form and this is yet another golem summoned by the main antagonist.

Oddly, Skeletor is shown as being quite muscular, yet he almost never uses his physical strength, which suggests that these muscles are just another illusion. He looks intimidating and strong, but the fact is that his power is actually quite easily sapped, since it has no real foundation - just smoke and mirrors.

Each He-Man episode presents a relavant lesson at the end. This is always seen in the form of a brief scene that brings the episode's events into real World context. These coda scenes were one of the show's main ethical positives and they are something that practically all contemporary TV programs lack. The one presented here is about how quick routes to riches and power are almost always wrong. Thus, He-Man stands for honest work so as to provide honest results.

The She-Demon of Phantos - This episode contains some very interesting images. Skeletor has decided to subvert Eternia's weapons production by infiltrating the refinery in Phantos where Man-at-Arms acquires the metal needed for his workshop and forge. Skeletor hides behind a curtain and it is revealed that the supplies that the Eternians just bought are a fraud - worthless and frail ore - and that Skeletor blackmailed the Queen of Phantos, Elmora, to get his way.

Back on Eternia, Man-at-Arms has made some weapons, which includes a shield with an Iron Cross design, much like He-Man's breastplate. The fake metal soon becomes apparent when the newly forged weapons fall apart. Our clever heroes soon figure out Skeletor's newest parasite tactic and the coward antagonist immediately folds in fear as he is found out.

The interesting thing is that the spell that Skeletor puts on Elmora makes her see her friend, He-Man, as her actual enemy, Skeletor. This is really interesting, as Elmora knows that Skeletor is her enemy, but he just uses misdirection here and doesn't at all try to hide his guilt, just deflect attention away from it. The criminal Jew does this the same way by making Adolf Hitler seem like a mass-murderer when it is actually the Jew and his puppet Gentiles that are to blame.

Teela's Quest - This is an interesting episode in that it provides a side-track to the main storyline. We learn a bit about the background of Teela, whom Man-at-Arms raised as his own daughter, but she is actually adopted. Skeletor hardly plays a role in this episode, he just sends out Mer-Man to capture Teela as she travels to an oracle.

There is also a great scene that shows He-Man for the honorable warrior that he really is. He-Man actually saves Mer-Man, a sworn enemy, from certain death after the villain loses control over an ancient beast that he had magically reined, but soon it broke out into a rampage.

"In this war – as almost always – the unjust are known by their arrogance, their pride and their bullying nature. In this war – as almost always – the just are known by their honour, and by their noble behaviour." ~David Myatt

He-Man, most certainly, possesses the honor of which Myatt speaks. Letting Mer-Man die would have been an unrighteous act, but one that could easily be written off as a convenience. This is such a favorite tactic of the Jew, that he has gone so far as to orchestrate these kinds of "conveniences" as well as having a whole brigade of public relations officials that help pave over the resulting criminality.

Aryanism in He-Man
It is an unmistakable set of parallels that He-Man and the Masters of the Universe shares with National Socialist Germany. However, He-Man also fits as a part of a much grander mosaic - that of Aryanism. He-Man's appearance has been described as "Germanic" and this is quite appropriate, since historically, out of all the European peoples, it was the Germans who were the best example of Aryanism, particularly after Germany had become united in the later 19th century. Other nations only had the odd Aryanist individual here or there. However, German thinkers like Martin Luther, Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche and eventually Adolf Hitler all spoke out, in their own way, against everything that Jewry stands for.

The Jew is well aware of this and it is no mistake that one of the leading Zionist apologists had this to say:

"Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate -healthy virile hate- for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German." ~Elie "I might have survived exactly four or five death camps" Wiesel

If you think about it, that makes sense from the Jewish point of view. The German has repeatedly advocated against every major Judaic poison - Luther against the corruption of Christianity, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche against materialism, and Hitler was essentially a grand culmination of all this. He took it to the next exponential level - a nation-wide re-Germanization of all major aspects of society, and this was to then permeate down into each household and family member. He addressed both general concepts and took direct action. Essentially, Hitler held out a nice big silver mirror to the Jew, who then saw his own ugly character right in front of him. And it is for this that the Jew will never forgive Hitler. Not with the Talmudized ego that he possesses.

Today, Hitler’s concepts are being studied by members of practically every ethnic group and those people are seeing how Der Fuhrer’s ideas apply to their own nation. Perhaps this is why the Jew is becoming increasingly volatile in his actions, but often just plain old careless. War crimes, such as those in Gaza (a small piece of land that is essentially being used as an "internment territory") are being harder and harder to defend - shamelessness is no longer enough!

Story Dyanamics
This publicity image for He-Man shows some of the main story dynamics.

On the edges we have the animal-like characters: One bad - a crude beast. One good - a graceful bird with divine knowledge.

Then, the women-warriors, note that their breastplates and collars are very similar. The bad uses magical schemes to fight. The good uses her own wits and weapons in battle.

This is taken to the next level with the male warriors. The bad, Skeletor, creates many of the schemes and magical devices used by his allies, and he also summons golems to fight. The good, Man-at-Arms, forges weapons and commands actual troops in battle to help his allies. Orko's placement right above Man-at-Arms is accurate as he is the good side's magician, thus both these characters form the opposite to Skeletor. Orko also provides much of the show's humor and makes his friends laugh, while Skeletor's laughter usually comes when he feels like one of his schemes will work, it is a self-serving laughter.

Then, the apex of power is only attainable to the good, though the bad try and clamor up there every chance they get. He-Man is the ultimate combination of magical power and physical fighting ability. This is a dangerous combination, so only a few are privy to it, the noblest stock of Eternia. Ironically, this doesn’t include the King, but King Randor is highly respected and gives orders to Man-at-Arms who works closely with He-Man. Thus, the titular hero is like a secret guardian angel - all effort, no reward, and it's all fine by him - a true Ubermensch and even an Arhat.

Part I was a reply to that one particular video, but with this much closer examination of the show's content, I must correct my previous statement that the show "contains allusions to National Socialist ideas, though just on simple level" -- the allusions are not so simple! They actually permeate the show and reflect NS ideals close enough to make the show a good element on The Storytelling Front.

-------------------------------------------------
He-Man and the Masters of the Universe fan site
-------------------------------------------------

SEE ALSO: ThunderCats review

"He-Man" was a Nazi - Part I

I was given a link to a particular video not too long ago. This four minute video was basically a simple video-essay on how the cartoon character, He-Man, was a drawn from Nazi images and themes. The ominous music accompanying the piece seems to suggest a steadily creeping evil. The ironic part is that the video, on a simplistic level, is quite true - the show He-Man and the Masters of the Universe did align for the most part with much of the image of National Socialist Germany as propagated by the Allied and Soviet propaganda machines. However, the people behind that propaganda painted the Nazis as Devil Incarnates, but in the show, "the Aryan barbarian," He-Man, is the good guy of the series. We'll get into why in a little bit.

First, the video: Nazi He-Man!

The video is a rather lame propaganda vehicle, at best. Let's identify its weak points.

Target One: The Opening Quote
The opening quote is by Robert E. Howard, who was the American author who conceived the character, Conan the Barbarian. So it is not unreasonable to associate his writing with He-Man who is quite similar in appearance and general mythos. He-Man creator, Louis Scheimer, even based his character on Conan, though he opted for a less violent protagonist by writing He-Man as character that delivers a positive social message. The end of each episode features a short lesson or moral derived from the episode's themes. Robert E. Howard wrote in the 1920s an 1930s when racism, especially white supremacy, was rampant in the United States, thus the quote from one of his works is really a product of its time. When the video's author links the quote to the Nazis, however, he mysteriously does not provide any source nor does he provide proof that any leading Nazi Official admired Howard's fiction or anything of the like. If the Nazis were so obsessed with blonde-haired and blue eyed people, they wouldn't have approved of Hitler as their leader since he had dark hair. Thus, this video's attempt at connecting Nazism to racism is just a bridge to nowhere.

This point is further weakened by the fact that the video then shows a dark-eyed He-Man. He doesn't have blue eyes!

Target Two: The Iron Cross
The video then links He-Man to Nazism by pointing out the cross on his breastplate. It does, in fact, look like an Iron Cross, but the Iron Cross is not a Nazi creation. The Iron Cross became a military decoration and recognition of a soldier's valor in Prussia in 1813. The design was by Prussian architect Karl Schinkel, who based his design off of the cross of the Teutonic Knights. The Iron Cross also bears a strong resemblance to the Maltese Cross, which has its origin back in the Crusades when the Knights of St. John engaged the Saracens on the island of the Malta. The Saracens had weaponized fire, which proved to be a very effective weapon. The many knights in that battle who had saved their comrades from fiery death were award badges of honor, and these featured the cross that eventually became knows as "the Maltese Cross" - a recognition of bravery in the fires of war.

Hint: they're not all Nazis.

The design from the 1770s in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth appears to be the oldest of the Iron Cross variants, but it was actually a hoisted banner used by the Hussar Cavalry and was known as "Husarski Krzyż" (Eng. - "Hussar Cross"). The first time it was used as an award was with the 1813 Prussian variant. Also, the 1920s Polish version of the Iron Cross was a unit insignia, of the "Death Hussars," during the Polish-Soviet War and not an award.

The basic design for this military icon is far from being exclusively Germanic. The pictures above are only a fraction of badges/military decorations that employ the Iron Cross/Maltese Cross motif. Note that even US Fire Departments make use of a similar design for their badges, this refers back to the story from Malta. Also, the German Armed Forces today, the Bundeswehr, not only use the Iron Cross insignia on vehicles, but also award a new variant of the Cross for valor.

Target Three: The Tiger
Prince Adam has a humble cat companion named Cringer. When Prince Adam assumes his warrior form of He-Man, the normally calm Cringer becomes Battle Cat, whom He-Man rides into battle. The main German battle tanks during the Second World War, were named after large cats - the "Tiger" and the "Panther." However, the connection to Nazism is, once again, totally superficial. The Bundeswehr's main battle tank today is called the Leopard... yep another big cat. Also, the video makes the point that the Tiger symbolized the Nazi Military as a whole, but this image was the product of Allied and Soviet propaganda. Thus, the video just effectively contradicted itself.

Target Four: The Lightning
When Prince Adam transforms into He-Man, he does so but drawing a sword and taking on his powerful alter-ego with a flash of lightning, which also transforms Cringer into Battle Cat. The video then states that the "Nazi military" was so effective due to the use of "Blitzkrieg" (Eng. - Lightning War) tactics. In a way, this is true as the Blitzkrieg was a revolutionary general attack strategy that coordinated ground and air forces, as well as gave officers in the field much more flexible orders for how to command their own soldiers and how to approach objectives. All this amounted to rapid military advances, but also allowed for quick, coordinated fall back moves as well.

The Blitzkrieg was conceived by the military strategist Heinz Guderian who served in the regular army and not the Schutzstaffel as the ominously placed SS Bolts seem to suggest. By war's end, Heinz Guderian was not convicted of war crimes and his conduct was deemed that of a professional soldier. His military theories went on to redefine war strategy and, like the cat names for German tanks, as well as the Iron Cross, those theories are still in effect today and are used by every modernized military.

The maker of this video must see Nazis in his sleep, since a warrior figure with thunder and lighting reminds me more of the Norse god Thor than anything else. The Scandinavian countries, to this day, have big cats as centerpieces for their national emblems.

Target Five: The Eagle
One of He-Man's key helpers is the Sorceress, who is said to be "an Aryan woman who dresses as, you guessed it, a Bundesadler Eagle." Actually, the Sorceress's bird form is a falcon, but I suppose that we could let that one slide. What we cannot let slide, however, is that the hopelessly naive out there (among whom the video maker can be found if anyone cares to look for him/her) will never comprehend the fact that "Aryan" does not mean "ethnic German" or "Germanic" or anything ethnic specific. Two of the largest ancient Aryan sites are not located anywhere near Germany - one is in Russia and the other one is in Bulgaria. Russia and Bulgaria are Slavic nations. According to Allied and Soviet propaganda that has become so firmly entrenched in peoples' perception of the Third Reich, the Nazis were said to have detested the Slavs right down to their core. Thus, news stories about archeological sites like this don't ever make mainstream news, since they effectively put a huge hole in the established lies and perpetuated illusions.

Also, it is down right to ridiculous to say that the Eagle logo is exclusively Nazi, since there are a great many countries that use an eagle for their Coat of Arms. The Great Seal of the United States also features a large eagle with wings spread out.

Target Six: The Protocols
The text, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (there are some variations as to the exact title) is said to be the "Anti-Semitic, Conspiracy Theory manifesto." The video then states that said manifesto "paints its 'Jewish conspiracy' as a Snake eating the world, as orchestrated by a Secret Society called Skull and Bones." The Skull and Bones is a secret society from Yale University and it has many pro-Zionist politicians on its exclusive list of members, including former Connecticut Senator Prescott Bush, father of former U.S. President George H.W. Bush and grandfather of yet another man to hold that office, George W. Bush. Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, who ran against George W. Bush in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election, is also a member. However, this one society, based in one university is hardly worthy enough to be blamed for all of the Jewish subversion in the World. Thinking along the lines that this video proposes will result only in foolishness. One must actually apply what they learn to the real World. And one famous American did just that.

"The only state I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW." ~Henry Ford, as quoted in an interview in 'New York World' on 17/2/1921

Sign up today!

Henry Ford didn't start to circulate and print copies of this text out of unprovoked hatred for the Jews. Though, the expert victim Jew likes to see it that way; he likes to paint his opposition as irrational so that anyone who speaks out against Jewry can be easily just branded an "anti-Semite." This goes for people that possess numbskull hate (as seen in neo-Nazis and racists) as well as people utilizing rational observation and application of knowledge like Adolf Hitler and authentic National Socialists, the latter to this day. Additionally, the term "anti-Semite" is intrinsically absurd as Arabs are also Semites and the main source of anti-Arab hate in this World are none other than Zionist Jews - thus they brand themselves with their own malicious label! Just don't expect them to admit that. It would be too much of a hassle for them to see past the illogic of their own arid hate and think of something rational to call their enemies.

Of course it is not just the Jews that fall into this self-perpetuated pit of folly. Long before he became Der Fuhrer, Adolf Hitler had noticed this in a great number of people. His thoughts are aptly summarized in the following passages from Mein Kampf:

"I know people who read interminably, book after book, from page to page, and yet I should not call them 'well-read people'. Of course they 'know' an immense amount; but their brain seems incapable of assorting and classifying the material which they have gathered from books. They have not the faculty of distinguishing between what is useful and useless in a book."

~Adolf Hitler    

"The material which one has acquired through reading must not be stored up in the memory on a plan that corresponds to the successive chapters of the book; but each little piece of knowledge thus gained must be treated as if it were a little stone to be inserted into a mosaic, so that it finds its proper place among all the other pieces and particles that help to form a general world-picture in the brain of the reader. Otherwise only a confused jumble of chaotic notions will result from all this reading." ~Adolf Hitler

This idea of applying knowledge was also something Tolkien wrote about in relation to his great work, The Lord of the Rings. He didn't want people to see it as an allegory for Europe and European nations - he preferred "applicability."

"I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its prescence." ~J.R.R. Tolkien, forward to 'Fellowship of the Ring'

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is routinely called a "forgery" and "a fraudulent text" by the mainstream press. About six months after Henry Ford, a famous and influential person, went on record as supporting the distribution of the text, an Irish journalist named Philip Graves, who worked for The Times, a London-based newspaper, "uncovered" that it's actually a hoax. The nature of this connection is about as solid as the "proof" for homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. The story took a while to invent, note that they didn't just automatically refute Ford, but needed time to cook up the right story. Eventually, a newspaper from one of the main hubs of the International Bankster Jews, produced the "refutation" that was immediately taken as "sacred truth."

FEUER FREI!
Well, there you have it. The weak points of this enemy vehicle. You know what to do with that Panzerschreck.

Conclusion
Basically, He-Man and the Masters of the Universe contains allusions to National Socialist ideas, though just on a simple level. The maker of the video above undoubtedly noticed this, but they can't get their head around all the anti-Nazi propaganda that they've been fed since grade school. In fact, given the intelligence level of most anti-Nazi information, I was expecting that at some point, someone was going to label Skeletor as "the evil Nazi," since his face is like the SS Totenkopf, his castle represents the snake that corrupted Adam and Eve, and his cohorts are brutes - that image is actually how Nazis are most often represented - "the incarnation of absolute evil." It is, in a way, ironic that the video's creator saw Skeletor as the Jew; it was a keen observation, but they took the final step, applying the story's symbols to the real World, the wrong way and saw He-Man as subversive evil.

SEE ALSO: Part II, review of the actual show.