Observations Around Society

Popular culture is in a pretty low state these days. Western culture has become driven by promise of plenty via little to no effort. Indulgence has become a good thing, as long as a worker doesn't neglect their responsibilities more than the relativist boss allows; this inevitably leads to cutting corners in effort all the while expecting more in return for the work performed. These indulgent desires spill over even more in social life as I have seen during my socially bizarre journey through college. Instead of discussing things like literature, history, politics, our studies or anything mentally stimulating, the point of social activity was inebriation in its highly limited number of forms. By now it has gone so far that most people take these absurdities as normal. It is a dangerous mix of decadence and accepting an overarching fate.

Gizmos are also a big thing today - a small portable phone with a camera and internet access is, by today's standards, simply a "cell phone." Added to the fact that most of these devices even have a multitude of "applications." One of these "apps" (people don't even say whole words these days) was called "The Lightsaber Application" and the whole thing was a simple display of the famous Star Wars prop that made the associated sounds as you move the phone around. Pointless - a goy bisciut - but people go nuts for these things.

My cell phone camera, which has spent a great deal of time being perfectly useless, or one could say "dormant," up until fairly recently when I decided to put it to use by noting several observations around society.

PHOTO 1
This appears to be an ad for the fast food chain McDonald's that tries to tap into the "more is better" craze. The man looks sad that he is only getting a small chocolate dessert with water, instead of a gargantuan portion of culinary chemistry in both solid and liquid form.

On slightly closer inspection you can see that it is actually a satire on McDonald's. Note the smaller print (click image for larger version) that outlines the dangers of consuming fast food, yet it does it within the confines of the ad, which grinds not only against McDonald's, but also against the elusive quality of corporate advertising. It also looks like the text of "possible side effects" that prescription medicine commercials have: while showing happy people the narrator quickly reads off a list of possible side effects and if written out, they may very well be as long that the ones listed here.

PHOTO 2
Next we have a joke about the absurdity of too much free choice or uninformed free choice.

This is part of the whole "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design" debate. The details of said debate are beyond the scope of this essay, but it is worth noting that absurdity is gripping an ever firmer hold on our society. The obsession of "rights" and "free choice" is one such thing as this cartoon demonstrates. Citizens of an Aryan State do not have "certain inalienable rights" as the whole concept of "right" is un-Aryan. Rather, citizens of an Aryan State have certain unassigned, yet always active, duties. Ensuring that the younger generation has plenty of chances to bloom with a solid education is one of them. When that is done with rationalism, the younger generation will have much free choice and, critically, their options will not be as ridiculous as the ones pictured above. The Historic Aryan Farmer lets his crops grow as they please, but first ensures the soil is fertile for them to do so.

PHOTO 3
A humorous take on the Arizona immigration issue. There is an NS joke in there, but I think that only reinforces a truth that most Americans are not aware of (due to corrupt education) or one that they just simply deny.

The power of an astute message is awesome.

PHOTO 4
A political cartoon that shows the nature of Judaic selfishness.

The black splotch over the Goldman-Sachs banksters looks like a simple space-filler for the composition, but to me it looks like a monstrous belch of pollution and it appropriately radiates from Lloyd Blankfein's rotten corpus.

PHOTO 5
This is largely self-explanatory.

It is also largely true. Click to read text in larger version.

PHOTO 6
Very interesting image here. Look carefully.

Some very interesting details here. First off, Adolf Hitler, apparently, wasn't the worst tyrant of them all. The death tally attributed to each of these leaders has drifted to and fro and varied from source to source, but this only points out the quality of the mainstream. I have seen 20 million next to Stalin before. For Mao, this is quite low as I have usually seen him "awarded" with 50 to 70 million. However, the 15 million by Hitler is quite strange. The official "holocaust" narrative comes to a total of 6 million. The total dead during WW2 is commonly said to be 50 million, and Hitler has been blamed for starting the war, so why not just make him the worst of the three leaders here? Probably, because that is so ridiculous that it cannot even make it into the mainstream. Thus, Hitler is left with just 6 million, but then he would look fairly tame next to the others, so the cartoonist just multiplied by... er, 2.5... yeah.

What is also interesting is the shape of each head. Note the roughly pyramid shape, which could possibly refer to the "evil power pyramid" as seen on the back of the US Dollar Bill. Each leader's two eyes would be below the ominous all seeing eye at the pyramid's apex. As they are drawn this "third eye" seems to be in their brains - evil men thinking up evil schemes. Stanley Kubrick would approve of this view and showed many ominously themed pyramid compositions (particularly in A Clockwork Orange) and also equated the NS movement to absolute evil (even in the same movie).

Though, as we have seen, the false images are such cartoons.

NOW BEST FOR LAST

PHOTO 7
There was a large tack board that I passed one day and saw a very interesting detail. The frame of the board was lined with 4 identical strips that has a design of various international flags. Coincidentally (or perhaps not) the German flag and the Israeli flag were next to one another. There was also a tiny and precise bit of vandalism that was quite consistent. The top strip was covered with announcements and photos, thus mostly obscured. However, the other three were very visible. I photographed a detail from each of those. Click image for larger version.

Ownage!

This was in the halls of a New York university and there are many Arabic students enrolled at this school who no doubt have expressed their feelings on a certain illegally occupied territory that is administered by criminals guilty of mass murder and actual blood libel.

Society, there is much in the details.

The Aryan Kampf in "Lord of the Rings" - Part VI

Conclusion

After Aragorn's coronation as the new King of Gondor, the goals of the Kampf that the Fellowship set out on, have finally been accomplished. There is a spiritual progression throughout all of Middle Earth, but especially in the members of the Fellowship. Gandalf had ascended to Arhat much earlier, but now Frodo and Aragorn effectively join him. Also, given his ancestry, Aragorn taking his rightful (and dutiful) place on the throne at Minas Tirith is effectively the first major step in the reemergence of the Aryan civilization. However, since all key Aryan traits are not ethnic specific, the new standard of nobility that is now in place throughout Middle Earth is the real meaningful reemergence of Aryanism. One Aryan leader wouldn't mean much without a noble folk supporting him.

The Hobbits return to their Shire and most of the residents here are completely unaware just how monumental the past thirteen months have been. With their noble character, Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin expect no thanks, they just know that what they did was right and that's enough. This change of character can be seen as they share a pint of ale in their favorite tavern, the Green Dragon. They just sit in silence, with a sigh of relief, do a "cheers" and take a few relaxing sips of the ale that they haven't had for over a year. Note that in the background, the other Hobbits behave like, well, like Hobbits; they're rowdy and inebriated, but they do mean well, though only in a humanist (or maybe hobbitist?) sense. Our four little friends, however, have become conscious of Arya and Universalism. It also gives Sam that extra bit of confidence he needs to finally profess his love for Rosie, the alewife at the tavern.

The Scouring of the Shire
There is a very large deviation from the source material in this concluding series of scenes. In general, everything ends up in the films as it does in the books, but one key episode was omitted from the film version: the chapter entitled "The Scouring of the Shire."

This chapter begins right when Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin are returning to the lands of their Hobbit kin, but soon realize that something is very wrong. In short, the Shire has been over-run by thugs and also has been turned into crude industrial complex. To our heroes' surprise, it is all the work of Saruman along with his servant, Grima. In fact, what has been done in the Shire seems to mirror what happened at Isengard with the massive golem foundry for making orcs.

With this key episode Tolkien has effectively illustrated the arid hate and parasitic persistence that drives the Jewish subversion of nations and cultures; if one place doesn't work out, flee and hide for while until another opportunity is ready to be exploited. The forcing of destructive industrialization represents Tolkien's own fears from what he saw happen to the English countryside as many nations and economies started to get more and more mechanized. However, the well versed Tolkien must have also known about such things going on in the USSR and this is where the "rule by terror" notion seen in the story can be applied. It is a well known fact that at least 75% of all Soviet Commissars were atheistic Jews and they hated priests, yet held rabbis in high esteem, which of course, makes it plain that they just announced themselves as atheists, but secretly continued to practice Judaism. This also makes plain as to why the Soviet regime destroyed churches, but left synagogues standing. Saruman's actions in the Shire here are basically a line by line account of Bolshevik terror, but guised in story and metaphor.

Despite this different chapter in the book, Saruman's fate is very similar in both book and film. In both instances, Grima jumps up at him with a knife, but is then cut down by some well aimed archery. Though, in the book it is the Hobbits that fire the arrows. This also brings us to a key factor of message subversion. The movie shows the Hobbits living a peaceful life and not worrying about anything - all the important events take place elsewhere. Most people living today are in a situation analogous to Hobbit life - there is work, family, and job with the great big World beyond this immediate sphere and it is primarily seen through the media. Thus, the film's message is "don't worry, someone capable will fix all those horrible things you hear about." There is no doubt that Tolkien was well aware of the dangerous folly of such thinking and thus made it clear that ALL nations and folks must be ready to stand up and fight - even happy little Hobbits.

This review of the film The Dark Knight also examines the idea of ordinary people needing to unite to solve the plagues of their nation. Note the last section on the character, Brian.

Saruman's death in the film has metaphysical metaphors as we identified in Part V - he gets impaled on a symbolic Aryan Sun Wheel - while in the book he is driven out by Hobbit militarism with his death being a little more pitiful - he dies from the volatility of the situation that he is ultimately responsible for getting himself into. These two endings may take a different route, but wind up at the same meaning. The spoke wheel from the film could also be a link to Buddhism, which is an ideology that thoroughly rejects nefarious Talmudic materialism.

Saruman's Final Bane

Some Other Matters
Galadriel's Ring, which only shows up in one brief scene, can be seen to have six-points as the Judaic hexagram. However, Galadriel's ring is a flower, not a star, and on close examination you can see that the petals are "swooshed" to give it a spinning, or even Sun Wheel, appearance. The connection between Flower and Sun furthers this idea, thus the Rings that the Elves made to get knowledge about Middle Earth are shown as flowers to mean something along the lines of "blooming knowledge" from the Sun Wheel - the Swastika. Also, Galadriel's Ring is silver, while Sauron's Ring is gold. There is no doubt that a currency and monetary theme is at play here. Here some some interesting articles on the Aryan qualities of silver.

Perhaps the design choice of six petals was meant to appease Hollywood Jews, who just smelled a ton of money from the potential box-office success of an adaptation of such a popular book, but they didn't bother to look deeper and see that all the film's coherent symbolism and themes are actually Aryan!

Even the idea of the Elves "going West" has been inverted from its apparent Judaic/Masonic meaning. This was, of course, done by Tolkien long before the movie was made. In Freemasonry, when someone dies they are said to "go West." Tolkien ridiculed this idea by having immortal Elves go West! He flipped the Masonic idea on its head and probably had a good laugh about it. In the film version the last shot of the boat "going West" and into the Sun suggests that the departing Arhats are becoming one with Arya. It also looks a lot like a Viking funeral rite, in which the body was placed on a boat that was then lit as a funeral pyre and cast out towards the setting Sun. So, there are many interlocking metaphors here (as well as the satire) and they all tie in with Aryanism.

Passing into the Infinity of Arya

The one problematic thing seems to be that the one literal pyre that appears in the film is linked with Denethor's madness. Also, the dead at Rohan are buried in mounds. However, since the film takes place in the Third Age, before the Return of the King and Aryan Nobility, this can explain the lack of Aryanism in the lifestyles of much of the established nations.

Lastly, there is the idea of racial interpretation. The Gnostic Cross, which makes key appearances in the Hall of the King in Rohan and in the Royal Courtyard in Minas Tirith, is often used by White Nationalists. This can be seen on the main page of websites like "Stormfront" among others. This interpretation can be further solidified by the fact that all the good human characters appear to be Ethnic Europeans, while the bad humans are "The Men of the South" who can be seen as Moors or Arabs or even as Africans. Despite this, the racial interpretation is totally false. First off, the Corsairs who are mercenaries hired by Sauron, are shown to have many Whites among them, if not mostly Whites. Second, the orcs, who can occasionally be heard to speak English, have accents that can be heard around the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Thus, if race is applied to them, they'd could very well be White, though not necessarily due to the diverse population of those nations. The point is that this kind of interpretation of supposed racial supremacy falls flat on its face and cannot be made coherent through the whole story. Tolkien himself said that allegory was never his intention, but applicability. The only aspects that are coherent enough to be applied to our World are not racial, but folkist. Tolkien was advocating the unification of groups of folk. Note that this is precisely where he ends the core plot of his tale - when the various folk have united within their own nation, which then went on with noble relations with their neighboring folk, and this caused the defeat of their common enemy.

Also, as far as the Gnostic Cross goes, it should be noted that many non-racists, but racialists (a.k.a. folkists), use that symbol in their imagery and it is they who have an accurate understanding of its universalist symbolism.

Final Thoughts
The Aryan elements far outweigh the un-Aryan in The Lord of the Rings films. Even those un-Aryan elements that were introduced as part of the screen adaptation's production were nowhere near powerful enough to subvert Tolkien's themes. I have reviewed many films here, but this trilogy is, without a doubt, vital to authentic Aryanist revolution. Most of the other films that I have looked at only enjoy notice from small, but devoted, fan bases. The Lord of the Rings, however, is known and available worldwide in both its original literary version and in this very faithful film adaptation, which makes it one of the strongest elements that we have active on The Storytelling Front.

The War of Words: Storytelling Front

We are in a War of Words. There are many frontlines in this highly amorphous conflict. The Political Front may be the most obvious, but I believe that storytelling is also vital for this.

“An important prerequisite of a movement is a common vocabulary. The ability to form a unified front against Zionism, as well as the pursuit of Aryanism, requires clean and accurate expression of our positions. Emphasis must be placed on the use of common vocabulary by all supporters and allies of our movement.”

~Aryan Glossary

Thus, vocabulary is absolutely indispensable to the Aryan Movement, but words are only a means to a goal or ideal. Much like the National Socialist view on money, as a tool to serve a purpose and the lifeblood of an economy, words are the lifeblood of commincation, be it story/recollection, philosophy or political rhetoric. The Movement may be small now, but as it grows, there will be key ideas keeping it standing and goals still driving it forward. These ideas will have started as mere words and it is how we apply those words that will make the ideas, and goals that they lead to, uniquely Aryan.

In this article the reader can find an overview of the Campaign we find ourselves in. These ideas, however, will apply a little differently depending on role an Aryanist within the movement. A medic, a rifleman, and a radio operator may all be on the same general front line and may all have learned many of the same skills in basic training, but when the going gets real, each has a critically different duty to carry out so that the campaign proceeds forward.

Historically, storytelling has been a vital part of culture. Ancient Greece may be long gone, but Homer’s Odyssey is still being read and discussed. Der Fuhrer Adolf Hitler may have passed from this Earth, but Mein Kampf still lives strong. It can be said that this book was a key element in National Socialist mobilization in 1920s Germany. Ideas amount to nothing unless they are communicated, and so Der Fuhrer did just that. He effectively spoke to an entire nation - no scratch that - to the entire World with his book. The work contains many forms of written word: story/recollection, philosophy and political rhetoric. When it was being written, the NS movement was small and had just been overpowered and repressed, so this vital cornerstone that would prop it back up had to arch over many aspects in order to contain the full founding philosophy of a movement.

“First there was the Word.”

Mein Kampf was a major step in Adolf Hitler’s will to “recreate mankind anew.” The recreating of so many things anew needs to get more and more specific and storytelling is one of the next steps. I have looked at some films and media on this blog, in which I have identified both Aryan themes and ZC Propaganda. This is by no means an exhaustive examination of each story presented, but should serve as a springboard into the reader’s examination of their own favorite films. Note that Aryan themes are often subtle and in today’s mass-media they can usually be found in bits and pieces, here and there. Very few works are brimming with Aryanism, though there are exceptions like Cutthroat Island or ThunderCats.

Once a good sense of Aryanism is developped, identifying it in other streams of information should be easier. Today there is an immense amount of information flow, thus Aryanism has many potential routes, but also can be fairly easily drowned out in irrelevance. The mass-media is expert at creating programs that amount to Aldous Huxley’s imagined drug of Soma, thus it is easy to get lost and disoriented. On the other hand, this means that Aryanism, once spotted, is likely to be very obvious. Skepticism is always good for investigation, so take nothing at face value, but with a careful sense and dedication little shining embers of Arya will likely surprise you from very many different vantage points. Go to them!

Also important - Start to speak Aryan rhetoric so that when you are confronted by a Zionist or one of their lapdog goyim (i.e. an American neo-conservative) their words will be powerless. Kamerad Delendaestziobot wrote a good piece about rhetoric. Take careful note of how this applies to your chosen specialization within the Aryan Movement as well as generally. Again - medic, rifleman, radioman; all different, but part of the same unit.

Aryanism will only live if we live it. Or, the words of Ghandi, “You must be the change that you wish to see in the World.”

Tower of Babel
This is the Jewish paradigm for goy management. It applies to politics (capitalism vs. communism, right vs. left, etc…) as well as culture (social strife, religious conflict, etc…). To put it in brief, it is an idea to keep the goyim perpetually busy and yet achieve no progress. As the story goes, the people wanted to build a great tower to reach the heavens, but YHWH the Jewish idol, confused their speech and the tower was never finished. YHWH attacked their way with words to make unity impossible. Jewish over-influenced politics today is much the same thing - we have so much technology and capacity and labor power as well as people needing the work and wages, yet what gets done? A recent and iconic example would be left-wingers arguing with conservatives over a Mosque in downtown Manhattan. This conflict also played out along religious lines. The Jew can’t eliminate the Gentiles’ word, so he strives to make it useless and impotent by degrading it down to bickering. He does this all while ever refining his own words. Thus, today’s Tower can be seen as one of language and words, those that are needed to form a unity against the Jews, or the Aryan term, Unity through Nobility.

Work, work, work... and never get anything done.

ZC Propaganda Inc. routinely demonizes and vilifies everything the Jew disagrees with and it is a near perfect transposition of Kosher Slaughter into the form of word and story. Just take a look at some of the films glorifying violence, and especially the Quentin Tarantino trashterpiece Inglorious Basterds. Tarantino showed the film in Israel and the Jews cheered during the final mass slaughter of a shootout, since, in a bit of childish revisionism, Tarantino has Hitler shot to pieces in a Paris movie theatre to conclude the movie. Jews hate Hitler and despite that he has been dead for so long they still want to kill him brutally. Or see him die. The Jewish pleasure with slaughter never ceases to disgust. They literally feed themselves off of it. I direct the reader to my post on The Carnegie Deli to see just that I mean with that last sentence.

The Aryan Counter-Paradigm
Unity through Nobility, as I have said, is the motto behind the Aryan Movement, but our goal is NOT another (and better, stronger, etc…) Tower of Babel. That would be pointless. Our Aryan Counter-Paradigm is a Distillation Tower; only the noblest make it to the top and pass on to the infinity of Arya. Jews would think we’re playing with and stacking blocks… how wrong they are! We are recreating mankind anew with a complex new order that once in place for a solid amount of time, it will be impossible to imagine a different one. Our new system, and the words and stories that we’ll create within it, our new Noble Culture, will be increasingly impossible for the Jews to degrade. They have gotten used to same old thing, for one, but also, not enough people have actually attacked the Jew where it hurts him most - his tools for creating lies, namely his use of words. Render his production facilities useless and he’ll have to give up, and knowing the self-preserving nature of the Jew, he will.

Will you meet us at the top?

One example of this is that the popular term “anti-Semitism” (which is absurd to begin with, but hey, the Jews created it) went from meaning “envy of Jewish success” to “disgust towards Jewish racism” and the new catch phrase “an anti-Semite is not one who hates Jews, but one whom Jews hate” quickly started to make headway. One step in distillation has been made, a little lie reversed and the new meaning pure, but the process continues.

Another important aspect is that the Zionists’ (both Jews and Gentiles) main strategy has been effectively compromised.

Summary of Zionist trick:
1) Promote a policy that they know most people are too degraded to successfully execute.
2) Blame the policy instead of the people for the failure, allow their agents to reverse the policy and thus gain public trust.

Summary of Aryanist countermeasure:
1) Blame the people instead of the policy for the failure.
2) Make the policy work by gathering sufficiently capable people.

This reverse bluff paradigm applies to virtually the whole field of anti-Zionism. An Aryanist should see how it applies in their specialized field.

On the storytelling front, Hollywood plays a major role and all the Jewish owned studios routinely release films that echo what’s coming out of Washington DC. Just note the portrayal of Arabs throughout Hollywood’s history or for a specific example, just look at the film 300. I have a feeling that the recent film Prince of Persia: Sands of Time was a sort of apology from Hollywood about 300 and they finally showed Persia in a more pleasant light, however, they didn’t have any of the major roles played by Arabic actors and the main role went to Jake Gyllenhaal (Jew) and the film was produced by the Jerry Bruckheimer (Jew). Oh, Hollywood.

There are films that do contain genuine Aryan themes, some of which I have looked at here. An Aryanist’s examination of some their favorite films might reveal a deeper reason why they like them. Or maybe show that a film is actually un-Aryan. My opinion of many films that I used to greatly enjoy has changed much since I became an Aryanist. Right around the time that I started to read beyond the mainstream about the Third Reich, Tarantino’s Jewish fantasy from 2009 hit screens, and while I still viewed National Socialism as wrong at the time, I was approaching it from a rationalist view point (unlike the being spoon fed propaganda view point I had before) and the gleeful violence ending the film literally made me sick. I was only once before so furious at the stupidity of a movie before and that was when I saw Michael Bay’s Bad Boys 2 (another offering from the Jew, Bruckheimer) and it was also a spectacular disaster of gratuitous excess that all the goyim in the theatre cheered at. Perhaps, it’s odd that it took me this long to see past the goy illusion, literally it took all of college. Complex steps however, take time. As do campaigns. Aryanism is not an assembly line creation, it is expert craftsmanship and we are still all learning our trade. It took Adolf Hitler over ten years of hard work, which included prison time and the murder of Horst Wessel, among many other things, before his Kampf had a full scale mobilization. To create something genuine in a land of superficiality is hard work, especially when superficiality works day-to-day with illusion to create semblences of authenticity. And so it is, we must work hard and not lose our honorable standards. Never!

Prophet Mohammed, the Muslim's first teacher, lived by a much higher standard than he demanded of his followers. He was at the top of his movement, but not from pulling favors, he was fit to lead by his own honorable actions.

"The worst one of the people in the sight of God is the one who does not put his knowledge into practice." ~Mohammed

Archetypes
The historical archetype for the Jew is the Herder, the sly manipulator and profiteer from slaughter. Today this has been transposed into things like the corporate overlord and sleazy politician. The process remains the same, however, profiting from lies.

The Gentiles are historical Hunters, and the ever scheming Herder has invited them onto his game preserve to chase after his own animals keeping the consumer goyim ever busy trying to sustain themselves all while paying the Herder.

Aryans, the historical Farmers, never cared for quantity so much as for quality. Thus, the Herder’s monopolization has pushed the Aryans into small pockets here and there. Chances are that if someone, somehow, discovers Aryanism, they’ll be alone in their immediate area.

What binds us is our writing, our words. Be they stories, philosophy, political rhetoric, or even a short humorous anecdote. Though, stories remain unique and ever important, since they do not merely communicate the possibility of an idea, they show the idea in action via the art of fiction. This is a powerful tool that can be used without the compromising of one’s own honor. Use it.

"An idea that is developed and put into action is more important than an idea that exists only as an idea." ~Siddhartha

A correction on "failure"

I feel compelled to offer a correction or slight clearing up about my last post. I stated that "National Socialism is seen as a vicious idea that failed" and this statement was juxtaposed next to one stating that Communism too failed. Now both are are true in a way, but each in its own manner.

First, Communism has failed, but is not gone from the mainstream. In places like North Korea it continues to fester and make peoples' lives miserable. North Korea, the self-proclaimed "Democratic Peoples' Republic," isn't too keen on doing any sort of PR since the rotten and miserable decay that surely plagues their society will become all too obvious. While Kim Jong-Il buys new Mercedes sedans and crates of Hennesey Whiskey, he has his government print out information for his citizens on how they can get food from the land. Peoples' Republic, eh? And that's just one bit of information about this highly closed off and secretive nation.

The USSR is gone and while gung-ho American Right Wingers would have you believe that their favorite president of all time, Ronald Reagan, "defeated" the Soviet Union and "won" the Cold War, the fact of the matter is the USSR was festering much like today North Korea surely is. It's just that the then head of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev, wasn't stupid enough to continue to let the beast whither so he used his powers to dissolve it and let the surrounding countries take up their own governments. Now Gorbachev supports a social democratic party in his native Russia; a pursuit closer to nobility yet he continues to not see past the dichotonomy that fueled the Cold War.

The nations of Vietnam and China are still under communist rule and much more is known about these countries than about North Korea. Probably because their goverments have steadily been including market reforms in various doses thus fit the general practice of the West more than North Korea and maybe this is why they get more mention in the Western Press. Communism is due to fail there in that it will one day be replaced by Capitalism, it seems.

Now, second, National Socialism failed, as I have said, but in a much different way. National Socialism's fate is similar to that of Aryanism and it is no coincidence that the two ideas are very much linked; National Socialism was brutally repressed and broke under pressure from a war. It was around for 12 years before this violent end. While it is true that the war strained production capacities in Germany and life wasn't easy for the citizens there - probably even policy errors were to blame - but the fact is that National Socialist Germany, thus far history's only National Socialist nation, was a work in early progress. "It failed" is really a wrong way to put it, but I did say National Socialism "is seen" to have failed. Propaganda, mainly by Zionists, is too blame; for the villification, for the mis-information, for the hugely false perception.

National Socialism was never seen 70 years after its birth and implementation. Communism was and we know how that turned out. My father who lived under Communist rule has said that from what he knows of history and from his experience, if the USSR adopted National Socialism during its revolution and not Marx and Engels, it would be a nation still in existance and just as, if not even more, powerful than the USA ever was.

The idea of National Socialism is still strong; people sense it, even those programmed against it have a fearful reverence for it. This means they can be encouraged to see past Zionism and into reality. This is highly advantageous for our spreading of information and propaganda.

USA - United States of Arya

The United States is both a very good location as well as a difficult location to boot up a strong Aryanist movement. The problem is most of Europe is even probably even more difficult. However, it is in the West that the ripples must first be formed for them to have a chance of forming into a worldwide wave.

Strategically the US and the UK should be the center of initial operations. English is a language known worldwide thus information posted could easily circle the World. However, more importantly, both countries are prime for smashing the villification Aryanism has faced. Villification, is essentially a form of herd manipulation where some select information mobilizes the masses to "remove" an element... sometimes literally, sometimes just through stigma. This tactic is most definitely un-Aryan, but unforetunately it is quite effective. In many European countries just displaying the swastika is a hate-crime and grounds for arrest. In contrast, the Soviet Hammer and Sickle, which represents a system that has systematically caused the deaths of at least 20 million people under Stalin and 50 million under Mao (in additon to other regimes), according to popularly agreed upon and accepted as mainstream statistics, has remained relatively unstigmatized. There is even a Stalin themed coffee shop in Moscow, which I have not seen, but can reasonably assume that said coffee shop is overflowing with Soviet imagery.

There is even a statue of Lenin on Houston Street in New York City and USSR themed t-shirts are not too common, but can be seen around here and there in places frequented by left-leaning crowds. This is because Communism is seen as a beautifully conceived idea that failed; while National Socialism is seen as a vicious idea that failed. It cannot be said that National Socialism as seen in 1930s Germany was perfect or was implemented perfectly and it is with these two few points in mind that we come to the present day United States.

The United States is a very diverse country with people from all walks of life, society and the political spectrum. In fact, most cultures and ethnicities can probably be found in parts of the Unites States; some in larger amounts than others. It is this diversity that the present day Aryanist movement can use to smash the villification that has been thrust upon it. There are Aryans and anti-Zionists in the USA and this means they likely come from a variety of cultures. Thus once enough have been taken aboard, Aryanism will have a great weapon in shedding its curse; our own ranks will show that we do not wish to discriminate blindly. Our ranks will show that we are not neo-nazi loons who are just a form of hippies with their foolishness. Our ranks will show other people in other countries that they can too be Aryans.

This will be the ripple that will start the wave.

However, rationalism tells us that this will only make the Zionist lobby fight harder to further press down Aryanism. This means our unified front will be a vital shield for our movement.