The Irony of "Conspiracy"

The word "conspiracy" is most often heard today as being on the fringes of the information sphere. This is largely due to the nature of what a conspiracy is, something deliberately not made public, however it is also a way to prove arguments wrong: "it's just a conspiracy theory."

Very odd then, that a film about the Sacred Cow of mainstream information, one that fully supports all of its absurdities, myths, fabrications and the like, all the while attempting to sell them off as perfectly feasible and even logical, is called Conspiracy. I am referring to the 2001 HBO production about what is commonly known as "the Wannsee Conference" where the "Final Solution" was said to have been concocted.

The very first frame of the film is the first oddity, it is the title card of the film. The letter "o" is also the wreath held by the Imperial Eagle on the NSDAP Emblem. My best guess is that the title "Nazi Conspiracy" would have sounded a bit lame, too much like pulp fiction, so they snuck in that notion with a small bit of graphics work. However, the thing that seals the deal with this film is the opening narration, which soon starts, and which states that "only one record of what was said and done here survives." Thus, within less than a minute the film admits to being highly speculative at best.

The next thing that happens is the third and final oddity, which is the entire rest of the film: the whole catalog of "evil Nazi" stereotypes. It is really quite amusing in a weird way. HBO is a major company and network, they hired some fine Shakespearean actors for this film and the production design is very good quality for a historical film; however all that is all just distraction from the sheer absurdity of what they talk about. You are supposed to be taken in by the dramatic performances so that you don't, by chance, happen to think that you could go and verify by yourself the information presented. The sights and wonders of good actors at work is supposed to be all that is required to convince viewers, and sadly, for the most part, it does.

NS Stereotypes
They were pretty unoriginal with them here. Adolf Eichmann, the man said to be responsible for scheduling all the trains to "death camps" as they are known by ZC, is shown to be a cold-faced, stingy bastard who is annoyed by the slightest mistake in order. We can see this right away as a kitchen worker drops some plates causing them to shatter. Immediately Eichmann barks in anger and orders that the cost of damage be taken from the worker's next paycheck.

The saying, "Heil Hitler," is used ad nauseam as the arriving NSDAP officials greet each other. They shout it repeatedly despite being indoors and each time they whip out the accompanying salute. Literally, the lobby of the mansion feels like a parade ground during this scene.

The most ludicrous, and also the most generic, stereotype is the portrayal of Gerhard Klopfer, who was a slender man, but in this production he is portrayed by the quite obese Ian McNeice. The actor plays his role as a perverse, gluttonous slob and the film's speculative nature begins to partly fade and be replaced with the sense of "deliberately misleading." In fact, the here fictional Klopfer very much resembles the real Ariel Sharon who is a bigoted war criminal, albeit with an efficient public relations department that covers up his and his fellow Zionists' crimes against the Palestinians and other groups. The film's portrayal of Reinhard Heydrich also bears a key element of ZC Propaganda - in the film Heydrich is shown as being blonde and blue eyed, the so called "Aryan ideal" of the Third Reich. The real Heydrich was blue eyed, but he wasn't blonde as many readily available colorized photos of him show. Even from the black and white photos we can see that his hair appears as too dark to have been blonde.

Racism and Bigotry
In compliance with ZC, the film portrays the officials meeting as quite racist. This comes in the form of intermittent spouts of bigotry. Many of these are anti-Polish. I found this odd, since the National Socialists of Germany were said to have hated everybody (but especially the Jews) so why do they seem to insult the Poles more than other groups? The answer is a simple Jewish manipulation. Poland had a large Jewish population and many Poles were put into the internment camps along with Jews where they suffered from the same typhus epidemic, many of them dying. Thus, when the Zionists pitched the "6,000,000 figure" the Poles were among their easiest to lure goys. The Jew had nestled his way into winning sympathy for fictional atrocities. The film's dialog just continues that myth: "You Poles should hate the Germans just as much as we do since they were trying to kill you too." To keep this myth in line, stories of dedicated soldiers like Herbert Kaminski and Gerhard Michalski are totally ignored in the mainstream sphere. Both men were ace pilots in the Luftwaffe and identified as Germans, but their names clearly show them to be of mixed extraction, thus exposing "German racial mania" as fiction. In a great irony, practically all of this German anti-Slavic bias is actually a Jewish creation; a false flag to gain support for policies and campaigns. I, as an ethnic Slav born in Poland, have never been discriminated against by Germans despite having come into contact with many over the years. I have, however, been insulted on basis of heritage by Jews from Russia and they were the only group to have spit bigotry in my face. This is also in contrast to ethnic Russians who have never directed any such remarks toward me.

It is also worth noting that the Wehrmacht was incredibly diverse on an ethnic scale. Many times more so than the Allied and Soviet armed forces.

In the film, the Germans at the table discuss all sorts of ways to isolate Jews and prevent them from mixing with ethnic Germans. They rant about statistics and fractions and "preserving race" and "not polluting blood" and basically everything that the Jews condone and actually do themselves today! They invented the Nazi myth to downplay the Israeli reality.

Excerpt from this IHR interview with General Otto Ernst Remer:

IHR: Is it true that the Germans referred to the Russians as "subhumans?"

Remer: Nonsense! The Russians are human beings just like everyone else.

Your question, whether we called the Russians "subhumans," is nonsense. We had a first-class relationship with the Russian people. The only exception, which was a problem we dealt with, was with the Soviet Commissars, who were all Jews. These people stood behind the lines with machine guns, pushing the Russian soldiers into battle. And anyway, we made quick work of them. That was according to order. This was during a war for basic existence, an ideological war, when such a policy is simply taken for granted.

There was sometimes talk about the so-called Asian hordes, and ordinary soldiers sometimes spoke about subhumans, but such language was never officially used.

General Remer was a top ranking NS official who knew Adolf Hitler very well.

Now, some words from influential Jews:

"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."
~Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 (NY Times, 2/28/1994, pg 1)

"The nation of Israel is pure and the Arabs are a nation of donkeys. They are an evil disaster, an evil devil, and a nasty affliction. The Arabs are donkeys and beasts. They want to take our girls. They are endowed with true filthiness. There is pure and there is impure and they are impure." ~Rabbi David Batzri, head of the Magen David Yeshiva in Jerusalem (Israeli newspaper Haaretz, 3/21/2006)

So there you have it. Thoughts on racism from a top NS official and from top Jewish Rabbis. Predictably, the racism comes from the Jews.

The Big Deal
As with any "Holocaust" movie, the big thing here is the "gas chambers." These are also the film's biggest gamble, since if one manages to disprove this issue, then the whole films goes from highly speculative to definitely false.

Soon after the fictional film Nazis finish with their obligatory racist ranting, the "logical" conclusion of the evil Nazi mind is reached: extermination. This is ZC's key tool of attack in this film. First, they provide a slightly more sophisticated surface picture of the NS personnel, however the core of film's message it is just the same thing as Wolfenstein 3D. It is a clever move so as to make the demonization of the Nazi ideas and not the Nazis themselves. The more plausible than usual surface of this presentation makes for a greater chance that the audience will swallow the underlying falsehoods. Even if these are taken in subliminally, the job of the film to deceive is done.

Additionally, the film also says that "it is not the Germans that are bad, just Nazis who could potentially be of any ethnicity." It is a subtle distinction, more of a grey area really, but in demonizing ideas and not people, ZC effectively broadens its range of attack, yet hones its accuracy as well. For the most part, the guilt tripping of Germans is only a part of their propaganda, the biggest part is guilt tripping anyone who dares to think positively about National Socialism.

The irony is that in doing so, we can see that ZC fears that more and more people are realizing that National Socialism is not just a German thing. This means that they have effectively acknowledged the universal applicability of NS! Now, people just have to see through the morbid Jewish fiction, which comes next.

In the film, Eichmann states that with the building of a new camp at a location called Auschwitz, they will be able to kill 2,500 Jews per hour and 60,000 Jews per day. Many of the members at the meeting react in shock, except for the blonde, blue eyed fictional Heydrich who smiles coldly. The figures amount to just over 21,000,000 dead per year, according to the film. The shock is, of course, a positive and happy surprise as the fictional Nazis then proudly say that it will be like an assembly line to which Heydrich responds that "the clever Americans have taught us that one!" This particular line is nothing other than a stab at Henry Ford who wrote The International Jew and distributed The Protocols of the Elders of Zion after he saw how much of the text was reflecting what was really happening in the World at the time.

The film's discussion about gas chambers amounts to just sneering and throwing big numbers around, which is effectively just sensationalist entertainment and shock value. One should find it odd that the men in the film don't discuss where they'll get the equipment and how they'll construct it. They go into much detail about many other things, like the aforementioned racial issues, yet this key aspect of the film is totally ignored. It is as if they say: "I got it! Gas Chambers!" The End. The reason for this is quite simple once one has found where to look.

These photos are a start:

Note the caption: it's in German.

A German company's advertisement for industrial gas chambers:

Yes, that is an actual advertisement for a German company's product, which makes it something that Adolf Hitler would have had unlimited access to if he wanted. This is particularly true after Germany went into "Total War" with all of the country's production geared for war efforts, which supposedly included a "war on the Jews." Yet, never in any "Holocaust" movie do we see any of these REAL GAS CHAMBERS. Nor are they in any of the camps. I have been to Auschwitz and Majdanek and nothing of the sort pictured above can be seen there. "Holocaust Denial" is NOT the refusal to admit a painful truth, but the refusal to accept a lie.

Historian Friedrich Berg has compiled an excellent online library of information about this and other subjects from the Second World War. The above images are from his site.

One should also note this article that acknowledges that the "gas chambers" were built after the war under Soviet supervision (read: gun-point).

With all this in mind we can see the greatest irony at play here: it is the film itself that is the "conspiracy."

Let's take a look at the meaning of that word, it is defined as such:

con·spir·a·cy
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies

1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a conspiracy of wind and tide that devastated coastal areas.

This film production perfectly fits with #1 - it is wrongful and subversive. The filmmakers and the Allied and Soviet propagandists (with many Jewish racists on both sides) are #2. The Allied and Soviets are all guilty of #3 - accomplish a legal purpose (prosecution) through illegal action (with fabrication and falsehood). This process continues today with films like this that justify the previous lies. Lastly, these actions, and Jewish actions today, are most certainly a "sinister design" - they know that they are wrong and that is why they fear revisionist investigation. That is why the "Holocaust" is protected by law, because it cannot stand by itself, it needs a witch hunt to frighten people into believing it.

"As long as people believe in absurdities then they will continue to commit atrocities." ~Voltaire

Certainly we can see as that being the case with Israel, the self-proclaimed Jewish state, in today's world. Dropping illegal chemical weapons, in the form of white phosphorus, on innocents. Detaining people without trial. Lobbying their biggest guard dog, the USA, to shelter them from all international criticism and prosecution.

Conclusion
The film's epilogue is rather interesting in that it states that many of the men were released for "lack of evidence." This, once again, shows that the film is speculation for if solid evidence did in fact exist about the matters said to have been discussed here, then all involved would have been arrested and jailed if not executed. However, even after the supposed "one record" was found in 1947 (by that point Germany had been under occupation for 2 years by the Allies and Soviets) nothing changed in the men's fates. For one, Klopfer lived and worked freely until 1987!

There is an interesting anecdote at the end that Kritzinger tells to Heydrich: it's the story of a young man who detests his father so much, that when eventually the man dies, the son breaks down in tears, because his life is now empty of all purpose after having directed all of his energies into despising his father. This is Kritzinger's warning about the hatred that Heydrich and the Nazis feel toward the Jews. The brief story amounts to nothing more than yet another short chapter in Judeo-arrogance. The Jews cannot help, but place themselves in the center of everything. The study of World War 2 will soon simply be reduced to the sentence, "The time when 6,000,000 Jews were gassed." National Socialism will become, "The belief that all Jews should be killed via gassing." Etc, etc...

It is rather pathetic, but a rather perfect example of the self-centered nature of the Jewish mind, the morbidity of its beliefs, the aridity of its ideals and the parasitic persuasion that affects non-Jews and gets them to spread the Jews' lies. And it all goes back to the herder archetype.

A related essay HERE as well as a close analysis of the Wannsee Conference Protocol HERE.

Fatherland: An Alternate Version of Popular Absurdity

In 1994 a made-for-TV movie called Fatherland was shown on HBO. It was based on the "alternate history" novel of the same name by Robert Harris, which had been published two years prior. The film adaptation has many differences, but the general story arc, along with all of its tired Nazi cliches, is quite the same. The movie also takes the ending one step further and this is the film's most absurd moment. It is so ridiculous that it actually works as a satire on the Mother of all 20th Century lies.

The Alternate Version of History
The main story of the film takes place in 1964 in days prior to Adolf Hitler's 75th birthday celebrations, but the introductory sequence gives an overview to the film's alternate history.

We learn that the Normandy Landings in June 1944 were a disaster for the Allies, which caused Eisenhower to resign in utter shame and for the US to pull out of the war. This left the UK to be overrun by the Axis Powers, but Churchill had managed to flee to Canada. With the western front secure, the Wehrmacht turned its full strength to the east and steadily took back lost territory, eventually making it to Moscow. Though, Stalin had fled to an undesignated hiding spot and continues to rule a Soviet rump state. There is also a seemingly endless guerrilla war going on the Urals between the Wehrmacht and pockets of Soviet soldiers and/or Russian partisans.

In Berlin, however, there is peace, though an uneasy one. Albert Speer had built his long planned Volkshalle and the grand Arch of Triumph to commemorate the victory in 1945. The SS is now a police force under jurisdiction of the Gestapo, which is shown to be a typical dystopian police, power-hungry and ruthless. The book gets into more details: Reinhard Heydrich (having survived the mid-1942 assassination attempt that in reality had killed him) is now the SS Reichsfuhrer after Heinrich Himmler perished in a plane crash. It is strongly suggested that Heydrich had the crash orchestrated so that he could become head of the Schutzstaffel.

Germany, now called "The Empire of Germania," which is something that Hitler never had planned; he planned on giving Berlin the title "Welthauptstadt Germania" once Speer's architectural projects were completed. This film version of "Germania" is hollow and cynical, it is shown to be just like an Orwellian Dystopia. There is even a "Ministry of Information" that tightly controls all the media - this mirrors 1984's "Ministry of Truth."

Portrayal of Adolf Hitler
Hitler is shown in a typically approved and wholly ZC way. Early in the film, there is the notion that Hitler wants Germans to abandon all religion and worship him instead. Xavier March, the main character, notices this when his son doesn't say Grace at the table, but a lyric about the Fuhrer. Considering that the actual Hitler had a whole personal library that he amassed over many years, with many books on religion, this notion is sheer nonsense. That article is from 2003, while the film from 1994, but Adolf Hitler never hid his religious views. Mein Kampf makes it clear that Hitler considered the metaphysical just as important, if not more, than the physical.

The scene where Hitler appears in the film makes him seem like a blabbering robot as he repeatedly shouts "SIEG!" to the crowd, which then replies "HEIL!" This goes on and on and on. In fact, in this highly fictional Germania, people don't even seem to say "hello" anymore, just "Heil Hitler." The culture conscious Hitler would have never allowed this to happen. It also makes it seem like all Germans were devoted party members, when in actuality NS Party membership totaled at around 6,000,000 out of a population of 80,000,000 in the Greater Reich. State and Party posts were also separate, thus not that many people wore a black uniform with SS Totenkopf and red Swastika armband. The Nazi Emblem may have been a pervasive visual in NS Germany, but it's not like every corner was a decorated military parade ground.

A lenghty interview with Heinrich Himmler discussing the NSDAP and its functions in Germany in this Institute for Historical Review article.

The portrayal of Hitler as an old, arrogant and cold-faced man is also wholly false. In fact, this fictional Hitler in the movie is an apt reflection of the Jew who cannot bear to look at his own ugly nature and tumbles into a fury over criticisms of his people's historically documented crimes. The Jew simply paints over the mirror in front of him and says, "see that's your enemy, through that window!" And even today most of us are tricked into looking with disgust at one of history's greatest men as we chase ZC created phantoms into the mountains of Afghanistan.

Authentic Hitler
“None of our projects of a practical nature will be completed in less than a period of ten to twenty years. None of our tasks of an ideal kind can be completed before fifty or a hundred years have passed. I started the National Socialist Revolution by bringing the movement into being, and since then I have guided its actions. I know that none of us will live to see more than the very beginning of this great revolutionary development. What then could I desire more than peace and tranquility? But if it is said that this is merely the desire of the leaders, I can reply that if only the leaders and rulers desire peace, the nations themselves will never wish for war.” ~The Real Adolf Hitler. 

Leader. Hero. Legend.

The self-centered nature of the Jew is also apparent in the way he writes history, always putting himself in the center. Hitler didn't care about Jews as much as he cared about the German people. He wanted to get the Judaic mindset out of them, their society and their culture. The Jews were definitely not at the center of Hitler's efforts, though they love to see it that way. Hitler did what many people have done before him: shut the Jew out, along with all of his manipulations, so that society can be free and so that culture can be unblemished. Hitler's focus was reform in Germany. The Jew was but one obstacle in the way.

Film Plot Overview
The plot of Fatherland is a rather simple thriller/conspiracy plot, just with cartoonish Nazis as key players. Xavier March, an SS officer and homicide detective, is investigating an unusual murder which leads him to smell a cover-up. The dead man was a formerly prominent NS Party member who had retired. The Reich is in general excitement as Hitler's 75th birthday is coming up as well as a visit from the US President, which will hopefully ease the Cold War between Germania and the USA. March's investigation uncovers some startling information after he meets with a US reporter who hopes to cover the story of the Fuhrer meeting with the US President. Maguire, the American reporter, had received some mysterious information from a man named Luther who asked to meet her. She warily accepts and Luther gives her evidence of a horrible crime that took place during the war.

March's investigation ends up becoming linked with the many other murders that have recently taken place and he realizes that the Gestapo is secretly killing all those who attended the Wannsee Conference in early 1942 - they are trying to forever bury all evidence of the "Final Solution." Naturally, March turns "true patriot" when he realizes the crimes his country has committed and out of the blue decides to defect to the USA! Maguire sneaks her way to where the Fuhrer and US President are to meet and hands the President the "evidence." And so once the "secret" is out, the USA severs relations with Germania and Hitler's empire collapses.

Yeah, ok.

Unintended (or ingeniously subversive) Satire
It is worth noting that the main character, an SS Officer and Kriegsmarine veteran, is named "March," which is not a German name. He also doesn't speak with that cheesy Hollywood German accent, but guess who does? The "evil" Nazis do! So German sounding people are bad, but Anglo sounding people are good? Ok, right.

This becomes most apparent when Maguire conveniently hears the confirmation for all the "evidence" - a slimy voiced lady with a thick German accent tells her all about the "resettlement" program - "vee resettled dem... een to ze air!" This lady is said to be an actress who didn't find success in Hollywood due to all the studios being "run by ze Jooz." We are supposed to think that this is just another sterotype, yet Jews themselves boast about this fact. Also, given her profession, acting, she wouldn't have as thick of an accent in a foreign language as, say, Xavier March, but since March is good and she is bad, the "evil German voice" must be spoken by her.

After that incredibly useful and spontaneous confession (known in screenwriting as "a plot device") we get to what just might be the best H'c0$t satire ever. Note that in the scene "where the truth is finally revealed" takes place at a huge ceremony in the middle of an empire's capital city with the leader and an all important international visitor present, thus security would be very strict and with good reason. Yet, Maguire manages to run through the crowd, through the rank of soldiers keeping the crowd in line, through the US Presidential limo's security, and right up to the US President and Ambassador to whom she hands an envelope, which they take and get back in the car without even looking at it or with a greater reaction from the "security." This would be just another lame plot device, but it gets better. The President then looks at the few muddy photographs of dead people and this convinces him of the awful truth.

The genius of this moment is that this is exactly how the "Holocaust" has been "proven." First, there was "testimony" and "confession" - parodied with the slimy accented lady's impromptu war crime confession dialog. Second, there were plenty of muddy and staged photographs that "prove" every single claim of Axis crime - parodied in the opening of the envelope with the few pictures. The film first mentions the "evidence" as "documents, photographs and signed orders." But they only end up showing some photographs, since that is the only "evidence" that actually exists! This is because photos can be taken out of context very easily, while with documents this is not so easy to do on such a wide scale. Documents have a trail, classification, stamps, signatures, etc... However, with a photo of typhus victims, it can just be said: "Look, dead people! PS: the Germans killed them all."

Really? Dead people? After a war that lasted 5 years and starved an entire continent? You're kidding right?

Other Issues
Germania is said to utterly collapse after the US severs relations. Pure fiction, since the real Hitler had made his country economically self-sufficient, by releasing Germany from the death grip of Jewish usury and by putting together a very sound economy that was based on work and progress, rather than pure profit and funny money. Thus, March is simply the stereotypical "good German" who loves the Jews, despite the fact that they raped his country economically.

Early in the film, as March first goes into the Police Headquarters building, some of his colleagues are discussing a sexual crimes arrest: "a pure Aryan woman and a Polack caught right in the act." So the woman gets resettled and the man gets 10 years hard labor. This brief scene serves the classic lie that "Aryan" means "ethnic German," as well as underscores the National Socialists' supposed race/biological obsessions. One only needs to look at the roster for the Waffen SS to see that the Nazis were more tolerant of different ethnicities than the American Armed Forces, which were segregated along racial lines. Also, Hitler may have encouraged cultural purity and thus discouraged mixing (in all cultures, not just his native German culture), but it is hard to believe he approved laws condoning draconian punishment for what may as well have been teenagers having a romp. In fact, from the start he was encouraging a sense of austere and if this film is supposedly about a Germany 29 years after it won the War, there would have already been at least one generation raised completely on those values.

This bit also serves as a good example for that fact that NS Germany is not so much outright lied about, but rather it heavily distorted via strawman arguments:

Aryanist: "Aryans seek to re-create the ideals of the Aryan Race through unity and nobility."

Jewish Strawman: "Aryans like Hitler want to breed a ‘Master Race’ based upon racial ideology."

Hitler's goals were rooted in much more in social order than in manipulating genetics. Though, Hitler's plan for a healthy society would inevitably affect genetics in the long term.

On the flip side of things, Dresden is mentioned and 100,000 Germans were said to have died there. That only begins to show the truth: in reality, at least 300,000 people died in Dresden - they were burned alive, a literal "holocaust." Also, this scene mentions that Germany threatened to drop the A-Bomb on the USA: Germany having the A-Bomb is not unreasonable in this alternate history, however Hitler made it clear that he didn't want war with the West and offered the UK seven peace offers which the stubborn Zionist lapdog Churchill did not accept. Similar conditions were offered to Poland's leadership, but Marshal Rydz-Śmigły was as much of a dupe as the rest of his Allied counterparts. So, in reality, it's the Allied Powers who wanted war. Or, since they were dupes, maybe it is more accurate to say that they were manipulated into war to bring down Adolf Hitler. That is no excuse for their crimes, but as Carl Jung said, “The greatest and most important problems of life are all fundamentally insoluble. They can never be solved but only outgrown.” Thus, it is the duty of all honorable people today to not only learn the truth, but to join the movement to spread it and abolish the established lies.

The ending of the book is slightly more ambiguous than in the film. Maguire is on her way and escaping Germany by fleeing to neutral and still independent Switzerland as a step in getting the "evidence" into the US Government. March distracts her pursuers by leading the Gestapo tail to where Auschwitz once stood. There is nothing there, but he finds some overgrown bricks. The end. Gas chambers, as that is what I presume the book is hinting at, were for the most part not made from bricks - Degesch, a German company, made metal gas chambers and US gas chambers from that era were very similar. Both were used to fumigate cattle cars to prevent disease, but smaller versions, such as in Dachau, were used to fumigate clothes. Also, the small brick building in Auschwitz that has the most Zyklon-B stains has been determined to be a more primitive fumigation chamber. It was built that way, since resources were very tight and virtually all metal was going towards production of military equipment.

There is also a scene that condemns the evils of euthanasia and sterilization as practiced by the Nazis on the sick and crippled. The problem is that they forget to mention that every Western nation did that at the time and many continued to do so well after Nazi Germany had been defeated. In fact, Jews themselves are willing separatists: they see themselves as different and superior. Such blatant and outright supremacist arrogance that leads to hate and violence on a Worldwide scale is praised by Jewry. They really do just look into the mirror and can't bear to see themselves, so they paint over the reflection and call it a "Nazi" so as to get the rest of the World to destroy the best remedy is has against all the aforementioned Jewish poison.

Conclusion

So overall, this is just a film that hates you. It's pure nonsense. Or what I call "Historical Escapism," since it effectively departs from reality as much as the James Bond movies, which are popular "escapist entertainment." The closing narration even bashes "holocaust deniers" and this closing narration (same voice as the opening narration) is revealed to be March's son, Pili, who escaped to the USA. He is proud of what his father has done and is happy that he can "follow his father's example" as all boys want to do. Thus, we have the final ZC Propaganda point - "honor your father by believing in the H'c0$t."

I will not be doing any such thing, thank you. Never.

One Example of Idiocy in the Mass Media

One of my dense Polish-American kin, Alex Storozynski, wrote this article on his Huffington Post blog. I used to respect Storozynski as he is passionate promoter of Polish culture in the New York area. He usually tries to get Polish-Americans to reconnect with their native land and culture without too much in your face nationalist pandering. However, with this little number, he has proven himself to be a hopeless goy, doomed to delusion.

The media's slander of Poland: Ignorance, lazy editing, or malicious libel?
By Alex Storozynski

The New York-born Chief Rabbi of Poland, Michael Schudrich, says, "Accusing Poles of participation in the Holocaust is a sin." Yet on a regular basis, American journalists do just that by calling Auschwitz a "Polish concentration camp." This is Holocaust revisionism.

SoE: The correct term here would be "incorrect" or "inaccurate Holocaust revisionism." The reasons for this are, of course, way above Storozynski's head which is packed with gas chamber myths and other assorted nightmares. Also it is worth noting that Storozynski automatically assumes revisionism is a bad thing.

The Nazi concentration camps were built by Germans, run by Germans, and guarded by Germans. The victims of those camps were Polish. Newspaper editors justify use of the term "Polish concentration camp" as geographical shorthand for "a German concentration camp in occupied Poland." But this shorthand is Orwellian doublespeak that turns victim into perpetrator and distorts history. It perpetuates ignorance about the Holocaust and gives impressionable readers the idea that Poles built the camps. The Auschwitz killing factory was a product of German engineering, and both Polish Jews and Catholics were murdered there.

SoE: Actually they were built by prisoners of the Germans, which included Poles and Jews. Victims (of the typhus epidemic) were everyone, though the Polish Jews with their fear of showering and general lack of cleanliness succumbed to disease more than others in the supposed "killing factory" that they helped build.

Ironically, Storozynski is the victim and perpetuator of Orwellian doublespeak as he holds myth as reality and fails to see it. Goy.

On Sept. 1, 1939, the German blitzkrieg stormed into Poland to burn down cities, enslave the populace, build gas chambers to murder Jews and execute Christian Poles that helped them. Two weeks later, Soviet Russia sent tanks into eastern Poland to execute the leadership and destroy its capitalist system. Poland fought Nazi Germany longer than any other country and the Germans used Auschwitz to kill Polish soldiers and political prisoners, before constructing gas chambers to murder Jews.

SoE: So now the Germans invaded Poland just so they could build gas chambers? Despite the fact that they had their own, ones they NEVER used for murder. Read up on the German company Degesch that manufactured large gas chambers for fumigating rail cars and then see that those small stone rooms in Auschwitz, Majdanek and other camps look nothing like them.

At least, Storozynski is right in saying that the USSR invaded Poland, it's true, but he fails to see why the great Western Allies didn't declare war on the Soviet invader like they did on the German.

And actually, the USSR fought Germany longer than Poland, as did the Western Allies, but maybe Storozynski just used shorthand for "Poland fought Nazi Germany longer than any other country at the start of war" despite the fact that he admitted to not approving of shorthand due to the inaccuracies it causes.

Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, "in the big lie there is a certain force of credibility, because the broad masses of a nation are easily corrupted ... and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie."

SoE: Yes, Hitler did write that, but maybe you'd care for context and accuracy? That part of the quote DOES NOT end with a period, there is a comma and the quote continues:

"...since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick-a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of.

The foremost connoisseurs of this truth regarding the possibilities in the use of falsehood and slander have always been the Jews; for after all, their whole existence is based on one single great lie, to wit, that they are a religious community."

Der Fuhrer was talking about the Jew's method of lying and not about his own Noble Kampf. Goys never learn.

Hitler vowed to get rid of "Jews, Polacks and riff-raff." He would be pleased that today American newspapers blame Poles for his Nazi death camps rather than the Germans. The Nazis themselves gave the camp a German name, "Auschwitz" and then hung a sign over the entrance in German, "Arbeit Macht Frei." Calling it Polish is either lazy or malicious.

This past week, on Oct. 20, The New York Times ran an obituary of Dr. George Mathe, which said that he had been sent to "a Polish concentration camp in a cattle car." The shifting blame is getting so bad that in June, The Los Angeles Times even ran a piece in which its "Culture Monster" reviewer F. Kathleen Foley used the phrase "Nazi Poland." This is libelous. The Los Angeles Times corrected the mistake on its web site. In May, The Wall Street Journal used the phrase "Polish concentration camp." Polish-Americans protested outside the newspaper's offices, however The Wall Street Journal refuses to remove the defamatory phrase from its web site. The Polish Consul General in New York, Ewa Junczyk-Ziomecka wrote a letter to the editor saying that the Journal is "indicating that Poland was a participant in the Nazi crime. In reality, my country was Hitler's most brutalized victim with more than six million Polish citizens losing their lives during the war."

Of the six million Poles killed during World War II, about half were Jewish while the rest were Christian. German soldiers also transported Jews from 27 other countries into Nazi occupied-Poland to be murdered in deaths camps like Auschwitz. Because Poland resisted Germany, Hitler ordered his army to bomb and burn Warsaw to the ground.

SoE: More "death camp" nonsense. Also, it's a tough pill to swallow, but Poland could have saved herself by not ignoring Hitler and actually negotiating with him on his demands. Love him or hate him, Hitler was your neighboring leader and instead of making shady deals with Churchill and DeGaulle, my dear and beloved, but sometimes painfully naive Homeland, you should have not ignored your neighbor. One who proved to be very capable and who could have helped you fend off Soviet aggression.

This issue of historic accuracy was taken up by the United Nations, and in 2007, UNESCO officially changed the name of the Auschwitz to "The Auschwitz-Birkenau German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945)."

SoE: Well that's an unpleasant mouthful that the Jews force fed us.

Jewish leaders have also spoken out on this issue. In Jan. 2005, Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, David A. Harris, issued a statement which said in part, "We would also like to remind those who are either unaware of the facts or careless in their choice of words, as has been the case with some media outlets, that Auschwitz-Birkenau and the other death camps, including Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka, were conceived, built and operated by Nazi Germany and its allies. The camps were located in German-occupied Poland, the European country with by far the largest Jewish population, but they were most emphatically not 'Polish camps'. This is not a mere semantic matter. Historical integrity and accuracy hang in the balance."

SoE: LOL! A nightmare perpetuating Zionist Jew talking about "historical accuracy." This may very well have just made my day.

In April 2006, Executive Director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham H. Foxman, wrote: "As an agency which prioritizes remembrance of the Holocaust, we share Poland's concerns over the frequent description of the camp as a "Polish" camp. Such a description implies that the camp was built in the name of the Polish people. As you know, this is manifestly not the truth. Auschwitz stands as a monument to the barbarity of Nazi Germany. We therefore respectfully request that the camp be officially referred to as the 'Former Nazi German Extermination Camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau.' "

While there were Poles who committed atrocities against Jews during and after World War II, the Polish government convicted and executed those who killed Jews. The Polish underground established the Council to Aid Jews, Zegota, which rescued thousands of Jews. Irena Sendler saved 2,500 Jewish children from the Warsaw ghetto. Jan Karski sneaked through enemy lines to beg Churchill & Roosevelt to stop the Holocaust. They did nothing. Polish Army Captain Witold Pilecki volunteered to be arrested by the Germans and sent to Auschwitz to try to organize a prison break. The Germans executed thousands of Poles who tried to save Jews. The phrase "Polish concentration camp" desecrates their memory.

SoE: Goy Storozynski has been effectively conditioned to believe that disgust with Jews is completely unfounded and irrational. He also thinks that ethnic Russians (albeit Soviets) were responsible for the massacre at Katyn, which decapitated the leadership of Poland. It was, in fact, atheistic Jews that were the majority of Soviet Commissars. He also fails to see that Germans could have easily done the same kind of mass-killing in their half of newly conquered Poland, but didn't.

The Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita has published editorials calling for legal action against newspapers that use these defamatory phrases. But it doesn't have to end this way. Newspaper publishers and the Associated Press can easily rectify this situation by changing their stylebooks to banish the phrase "Polish concentration camps."

Some editors justify the use of this phrase as a geographic location of the camps. But while editors can find lots of reasons to avoid doing the right thing and banning these phrases from news stories, there are six million reasons why they should.

SoE: The only reason these phrases are "defamatory" is because your perception of WW2 is hopelessly misguided. The phrases should be corrected, yes, but not to stop defamation, but to make them accurate. This also involves getting rid of death camp lore. Six million lies is enough.

---------------------------------------------------------
Article originally published on October 24th, 2010 in the blog section of The Huffington Post.
---------------------------------------------------------

Messages in Majdanek

I recently had an unexpected chance to go to the Zionist Propaganda Museum in Majdanek, just outside of Lublin, Poland. I took the opportunity and the visit was interesting, to say the least. By today, the city of Lublin has grown much and practically reaches vast open field that is the former internment camp from the Second World War, though this area was never really as far removed from urban areas as the other camps of its kind. The official information at the camp even makes note of this “exception.” On the way to the museum one can read the official name that has been given to this place, “Majdanek Museum of Martyrdom.” If you are coming from center city Lublin as I was, you have to drive along the aforementioned field for a while before coming to the main visitors' entrance. Along this stretch there is a great stone monument that will aptly sum up the rest of your visit: impact.

Not information, but impact. Be it visual or from the mouth of a tour guide, impression making tools await to mold your perceptions so that they are as guided as the tour itself.

The Majdanek camp was turned into a museum in August of 1944, well before the war even ended, and less than a month after the Soviets captured the area. This was done under the direct supervision of the Soviet Propaganda Machine, which would go on to serve as a main provider of "evidence" against the Schutzstaffel in 1945. Immediately local, regional and national publications churned out Soviet approved stories of what went on in the camp and all this information was promptly used to demonize the Nazis. This may also explain why Stalin was so intent on keeping Eastern Europe under his control, it gave him exclusive control over the so-called "death camps" and what evidence was extracted from them and then used against the Germans.

Interestingly, Majdanek is one of those infamous "death camps" that supposedly had a homicidal chamber and massive crematorium going on overtime to exterminate any and every person that the Nazis disapproved of. Let's take a look at the official camp tally.

Numbers Speak

78,000 dead. Given poor and dirty wartime conditions, which included a typhus epidemic and the Jews' own lack of cleanliness, this number can begin to make sense. Odd is the fact that the Polish word by this figure is “zgineło” meaning “died” (there is no “killing” implied), yet the English version, and the one most international tourists invariably read, implies murder. The other translated pairs match up accurately, says this native Polish speaker.

45,000 transferred to other camps. Wait, transferred? I thought this was a Nazi Murder Machine death camp? Hmm... maybe I was wrong.

500 escaped. Ah, yes, a few rogues are always to be found. Also, it seems security wasn’t that intense: escaping from a guarded labor camp that’s next to a militarily occupied city in the middle of an occupied country and remaining officially declared as escaped seems like the Germans were not so intent on killing everyone in this camp. In additon, nothing was mentioned about what these escapees said... did they testify at Nuremberg? To the Soviets? If so what did they say and what was done with that information? Did it just not align with the propaganda so it was swept under the rug and the escapees then sent by Stalin to Siberia so as to remain forever quiet? Questions, questions; ones that demand answers.

18,000 released. Ok, seriously. They actually release people from “death camps” now? Why would those fiendishly evil, mass-murdering Nazis hell-bent on genocide ever do that? Well, if they were not “hell-bent on genocide” than this board of numbers is starting to make sense.

1,500 liberated. The Soviets “saved” less people than the Nazis. How amusing. Though this was, in all probability, just the amount people who were there when the Soviets showed up and after the Nazis retreated. Many more were likely to have left the first chance they got, meaning right after the SS cleared out. There was a big city nearby to go to... why wait inside a prison then if the door’s open?

One should also note the numbers, all nicely rounded, thus making them estimates at best. Odd, that a world famous museum has a mistranslation and estimates as main parts of its information and message, especially since it exhibits a topic that countless scholars were said to have accurately studied and reported.

Also, back to that mistranslation, this was not the first time I had seen a suspicious mistranslation related to WW2 labor camps. I say suspicious since it effectively makes the information presented not objective. In the movie Shutter Island from 2010 there is some back story involving the Dachau Massacre and in the dialog the main character first says “death camp” in English and then in German as “Konzentrationlager.” Strange, since the German translates to simply “Concentration Camp” (the direct literal translation), but the term “Internment Camp” can also be used. Ever wonder why the Allied forces have “Concentration Camps” but the Germans have “Death Camps?” It’s WW2 Allied propaganda still in play and it has become firmly rooted into peoples’ psyche. Even if one looks at the fact that the German camps did have more death, especially towards the end of the war, it’s because German resources were stretched very thin and often down right destroyed from the air courtesy of the Allies and their aerial assaults even on civilian areas. Dresden would be the most infamous example from the latter category here: people flooded to the Saxon city as refugees as it remained the one major supply hub for civilians in the area, and then the city was bombed despite having no military or strategic importance. If civilians fared this well from the efforts of the “heroic” Allied forces, then how might you think prisoners had it?

Mistranslation here, misunderstanding there, white washing here, exaggeration there... WW2 history is plagued by these things and all those little mistakes play against the reputation of the Germans and those who were at arms with them. This cannot be a grand coincidence. It’s deliberate LIES.

The gate to the main compound in Majdanek has a sign that says, among other things, that no one under 14 years of age will be admitted. Given the horror stories visitors hear inside, this may very well be some good sense, but something else made me think different.

There was an Israeli student tour group at the camp and all the kids looked junior high school age more or less, 14 or just a bit older. Interesting fact of psychology is that kids learn quickest and are most impressionable when they are under 12. The brain is still developing and many childhood lessons go on to define the shape of the adult to come. Israel is insanely particular about controlling the flow of information pertaining to it or information that it has interest in. Just look at any one of the countless “controversial incidents” involving the IDF, the smell of a cover-up or lies seems to be practically synonymous with such things. Jack Bernstein, an American Jew (and a man who is clearly leaning more towards rationalism than Zionist Propaganda), was disgusted by Israeli power hungriness and lies, noted in his book that when he went to the supposed “haven” for Jews of the World, that tourism was strictly monitored, what people could see was tightly controlled, where they could go was very directed and under constant police supervision. Are we to believe that the Israeli educational system is all that different? Those kids when they are still under 12 must be drilled to the core with Holocaust lore and completely shaken up by all the gruesome Zionist hyperboles. Then when they finally come to these “museums” to “learn” the indoctrination doesn’t stop. Not at all.

There was a tour group of slightly older Polish students at Majdanek that day too and I linked up with them during one exhibit, the one containing the overview of the entire camp. The tour guide was being intensely emotional and his speech was punctuated with key words that go along with the museum's design of teaching by shock and instilling a desire for a passionate reaction of hate or some sort of defense from fear. This “tour guide” with his sorrowful voice amounting to cheesy dramatic acting said that the camp commandant would take his young daughter to see mass executions of Jews (of course Jews, always Jews) and would even strategically cross the camp with her so they’d go through as much ground as possible so that maybe she’d get a glimpse of a “random lynching that the SS often carried out” on one of the numerous gallows that were “all over the camp.” So apparently, the men of Schutzstaffel weren’t just mass-murdering psychopaths, they were also the World’s worst parents.

In the moment, when I heard the last word of that anecdote uttered, I was convinced that Zionist Propaganda lost some of its usual bad taste and picked up a whole lot of idiocy to compensate.

There is one section of the camp that has been kept standing and the normal tour path goes through it, however, there were renovations being done there, so I just happened to come across it on a day when it was closed. The workers were making a new stone walkway through the camp grounds. I did notice, however, that there were none of the aforementioned gallows to be seen. The area was being renovated, but only a walkway down the center was being placed, the buildings by which the “numerous gallows” were said to have been were not being worked on. Another flub in Zionist Propaganda, in all likelihood.

The last site to visit here is the flagship of the tour and of Holocaust lore: the crematorium, where the industrially efficient mass-murder was said to have taken place. First off, the standard for “death camp” is incredibly shaky... if Auschwitz is a “death camp” with 1,000,000 dead, then how does Majdanek even begin to compare with 78,000? Majdanek is a lot smaller, so that could explain some discrepancy and it does have one of those supposed “gas chambers,” thus it doesn’t matter how many people died, but how they died. Ok, fair enough. Let’s look at a gas chamber from the era of when this camp was in operation.

This article, from the Commitee for Open Debate On the Holocaust, is lengthy and gets into serious details, but in the beginning there is a nice explanation of 1920s and 1930s era gas chambers, including ones that used Zyklon-B. Also is worth noting that they were made by Degesch, a German company. Thus Adolf Hitler, being the Fuhrer, effectively had unlimited access to this technology if he so desired. As did Heinrich Himmler, the SS Reichsfuhrer who oversaw the entire penitentiary system of the Third Reich.

I can tell you, dear reader, that there is nothing in Majdanek that even begins to resemble such a large and complex machine. There are some ovens, standard mortuary ovens, that were used for cremation. It was a very necessary process to contain disease and likely ALL dead were cremated, SS Man and prisoner (the city morgue in Lublin had also been likely ordered to burn bodies), since corpses can harbor massive amounts of germs and disease, especially when people died from typhus or any other deadly disease and each body in the ground was basically a lethal germ warehouse. The Germans went so far as to be thorough that they dug up previously buried dead and started to cremate them... hence the pictures of mounds of dead and crematory ovens going overtime. It was a massive and frantic effort of sanitation that, for all intents and purposes, was meant to save lives of all those in the area - German soldier, Polish citizen, and all prisoners be they POWs, political detainees or Jews.

One major reason that the gas chamber horror story remains official history is due to Soviet propaganda, which had enormous Jewish contributions. Soviet Commissars were greeted by Jews when Stalin invaded Poland, because many of them were Jews themselves. In fact, why didn’t the West declare war on the USSR which invaded Poland like Germany? Well, the fact is that Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union. However, Hitler had freed German society and culture from the highly disproportionate and destructive influence of the Jews and was promptly branded as the Devil. The International Jew’s War was with the Germans and their Fuhrer, the USSR merely provided one of the front lines of attack. Fortunately, some rationalism remained in the West and after the war on that side of the Iron Curtain the so called “death camps” were forensically examined to reveal no homicidal gas chambers, but ones for standard fumigation purposes meant to prevent the spread of disease. The USSR leadership, to help keep the focus away from monstrous Soviet crimes, did not permit Western forensic investigators to inspect the “death camps” in Poland, nor did they carry out such an investigation by themselves. They just rebuilt (often clumsily) the destroyed parts of many of the camps to accentuate their own anti-German propaganda, which then played a key role in the Nuremberg Show Trials.

The large stone monument where the propaganda tour starts.

Today, it is being used as indoctrination information and that Israeli student tour group are in effect, its latest victims. They’re kids, they don’t know better and out of all the students on this planet who “learn” about the “Holocaust” it is those Israelis that probably get drilled like no other. First when they are impressionable young children under 12 at home, then they go on these school trips so that they can evoke their first passionate internal reactions. Then they will return home, finish high school, and go on to carry out their required military service, but by then they'll be packed with as much Jewish fanaticism, persecution myth and blind devotion to the blue hexagram as is possible. They are victims because they are being deliberately misinformed so that they can perpetuate the Zionist crimes and related madness. They are being primed to be hate-filled IDF criminals and then life-long Zionist fanatics.

The intensity of “education” can be seen even right during the tour. One girl started to cry, others sang a requiem of some sort by the crematorium ovens. There was also a little bit of vandalism that I spotted: there were these signs in a side room, shaped like gravestones, and each one had the name of one of the nationalities of “Holocaust” victims. The sign for The Germans was scratched and some of the letters had been scraped off. Some apt pupil had already learned what his masters want him to do.

Questioning the official mythos of this propaganda is a punishable crime in virtually every Western nation, except the United States where rational investigators are merely shunned, stigmatized, and passively secluded from their job, their peers, and the decent life the may have had before they asked a “wrong” question or two. Or reached an "improper" conclusion, however logical it may be. In Poland, an example of academic fortitude, Professor Dariusz Ratajczak, who published a booklet called “Tematy Niebezpieczne” (Eng. - “Dangerous Topics”) in March of 1999, which raised questions about the official Zionist Approved Story, saw his life disintegrate professionally and personally for just over 10 years until his murder, which was officially declared a suicide. The Israeli Mossad was known to be operating in Poland, a supposed ally to Israel, but the Zionists spy and perpetrate crimes against everyone, so are we really all that surprised?

There are still rationalist investigators for the truth working out there, like David Irving and Fredrick Toben. Both did time in prison and both push on in their mission of enlightening the World. They are also more known worldwide than Ratajczak was, so their prospective lethal subversion by the Mossad would not be as covert as the Zionist fanatics normally like their crimes to be.

Truth doesn’t fear investigation, yet “the Holocaust” does. What does that tell you? Even if you don’t see the folly of it all.