Starship Troopers: Spaced Out Fascists

If there is anything Hollywood hates more than anything else, it's fascism. The reason is very simple: fascism is de-humanizing and with Hollywood being obsessed with humanism, this makes fascism very evil. So they have to tell their audience just how very evil fascism is every few years. Usually this means making a movie about Nazis or the Ku Klux Klan, but more likely a movie about Nazis: you can have more kick-ass explosions that way so as to ensure that your audience is not only impressed, but also thoroughly distracted from a rational approach to the subjects of your film.

Every other blue moon or so, Hollywood actually gets creative enough to make a satire (something a bit more complex than just the straightforward goof-ball comedy), and wouldn't you know it, in the Fall of 1997 they did just that: they made a big satire. To be more precise they made a satire about fascism called Starship Troopers. The originality is just a thin veil here and it is quite obvious that the message still is: "just reminding you of how evil Nazis are." The only bit of true creativity here is showing this from an unconventional point of view, which is the one truly good thing about this film.

However, given the typical film audience, they'll be lost in the rest of the film's creativity, which is confined to the extensive special effects - sights and wonders meant to keep the brain confined to the predetermined arena of thought. Thus, all in all, this is just another serving of the same old fodder from Hollywood.

Subversive Engineering
The very first sequence of the film shows us an eagle logo and a propaganda commercial encouraging young men and women to sign up for military service. The soldiers pictured all wear grey uniforms and that eagle logo is their outfit's main emblem, thus from the very start it is not hard to put two and two together.

Funny thing is that the real version is so much better.

The film then cuts to a battle scene as seen by an embedded news crew. Things quickly go bad, as some horrifyingly huge insects start to dice everyone up. Eventually we see one of the wounded soldier's points of view as one of those bugs jumps on him, with his scream the shot fades to an image of space with the title card: One Year Earlier. However, this view of the stars is next seen to be, as the shot pulls back, a computer screen on which a student is drawing. Aside from a relatively standard way that movies employ to build suspense, this beginning is suggestive of an engineered reality. Namely, the news crew's imagery and the scenes of the battle have just been juxtaposed with a student's doodling in class.

This theme of staged and fake media is apparent throughout the entire film. There are frequent news flashes as part of the story and just like the opening propaganda ad, they seem very staged. Even when Johnny Rico, the main character, talks to his parents via video-phone, or when he gets video-mail from his girlfriend, the shots seem deliberately staged. And not staged by the people Johnny is stalking to or gets a message from; due to them standing far away from the camera and some pretty bad acting, the whole event seems deliberately and hastily put together. Now, some films have bad acting, but with these media sequences it's too consistent to be an actor's fault - so either the director specifically wanted crappy acting or edited the bad takes into the final cut - the pattern is intended.

One media clip shows a missionaries' outpost decimated by the Bugs (mankind is at war with this arachnid species) and there are numerous close-ups of mutilated bodies. This raises two questions: if the planet was crawling with the Bugs, how did the missionaries go so far as to set-up their outpost? Wouldn't they we attacked pretty much right when set foot on a hostile planet? And how is the crew filming so much footage? It all looks like it may have very well been staged to further the constant message of "fear the Bugs." After all, with such a large war and with so much military equipment, it would be very inconvenient to not have a use for it all of a sudden.

Not Exactly Fascism Either
Well, as it turns out, this vision of the future is actually a vision of Zion. In the aforementioned classroom, where the student, who ends up being Johnny Rico, was doodling, there is a philosophy class in session. Professor Rasczak giving the lecture makes on point very clear: "When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force my friends is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived." In this world, only citizens can vote and citizenship is granted after military service with the idea that those selfless enough to put their needs aside for the preservation of the human race can make the best decisions about things. A seemingly good idea, but there is something critically wrong with the definition of "violence" used. Violence is not force, it can be, but at its root it is not. Violence is a "lack of consent" - the truest sense of the concept of violation.

Rasczak also describes how democracy failed and the military veterans swooped in and created the current order that has kept stability for a long time, presumably several generations. This draws a parallel to the film Equilibrium where there is a strong suggestion that the war that brought about the creation of Libria was engineered so that a Zionist system could be put into place with the impression that it "saved" humanity from total destruction. In this film, the background course of events is also the "order out of chaos" routine, however, in this vision of Zion there is less flavor of 1984 as in Equilibrium and more of Brave New World as there are enough pleasurable distractions in the Federation so as to make no real need for a brutal, ever-present police force. Still, the root of this fictional state is un-Aryan and therefore not National Socialist, and so the film's satire of the Third Reich is just spawned from ignorance. "Fascism" (as seen in Hollywood movies) is the ZC approved version of National Socialism as it exaggerates certain traits (e.g. militarism) making them seem all pervasive in their most basic form, distorts some of them (e.g. duty) giving the impression that people are motivated by promises of greater comfort and/or fear, and just outright lies about the rest as we see in the society's approach to science and the military. There is no mention of Aryan ideals, let alone how people can work to achieve those goals, which is something that Adolf Hitler made a major, if not the most all-encompassing, part of his platform as Fuhrer of the Third Reich.

With all of this in mind, the film is really not a satire and we can see that it was not really made out of ignorance, at least not on part of the producers. The director, Paul Verhoeven, may very well be a useful idiot who grew up "hating Nazis" and was employed for his approved views and ability to put a film project together, however the producers in Hollywood, from whom the $100 million budget came from, knew what they were doing. They presented a careful distortion of the thing they fear most.

Irrational Science
For a large future state that seems to be enjoying prosperity, it's quite odd that its approach to science is so base and primitive. Right after the philosophy lecture, the students go to a science class where they dissect large bugs. Not the ones the humanity is fighting a war against, but also a species alien to Earth. The professor here, a stereotypically geeky looking science teacher, is talking about how wonderful and perfect examples of evolution these creatures are and names that one of their admirable traits is the ability to reproduce in large numbers, thus ensuring the survival, or rather preservation, of the species. This idea is a key as it is an apt concision for the principle motivations of the Human Federation and this is another element that makes the fictional state thoroughly un-Aryan - one of the film's planned distortions.

Next, there is a scene where Johnny and his friend Carl are attempting mind reading and psychic tricks. In the background is a picture of Albert Einstein, who has been hailed as a king of reason and has become the face of scientific progress during the 20th Century. Only Jews would boast about such a man who was nothing more than a plagiarizing Zionist racist. Carl then places a kernel of popcorn at the entrance of a maze and watches his pet ferret navigate its way out and eat the little treat. He says that he trained the critter for this and even shows that he can "dispatch" it to run upstairs and annoy his mother. The ferret goes upstairs because Carl has conditioned it to believe that there is a treat up there. Carl states in this scene that he wants to experiment on people, the card trick he attempts with Johnny is his own pilot project for this goal. Effectively, this brief episode is an allegory for the rise of Zion - from controlling small creatures and then working its way up to dominating mankind. The appearance of Einstein suggests manipulative Jewish science, more than anything else, and of course, in this scene they are basically doing the classic carnival card trick, the only thing that's missing is the "pay to play" robbery scheme. With Johnny getting every card wrong (and Carl even making fun of him for it) he would have lost a lot of money.

Of course, the filmmakers didn't intend this scene to be read this way - Einstein is practically a saint to scientists - and the intention is to show the audience how cool all this is. Things get even more ridiculous as we see military science and technology.

Army Toys
For a state that was founded by veterans and is in a life-or-death war against another species able at combat, the Federation's Military is absurdly insufficient. We start at basic training and first get our obligatory scenes showing us just how evil and brutal fascists are: Drill Sergeant Zim breaks a recruit's forearm and pins another recruit's hand to a wall with a throwing knife just to make a point. It is procedural for military instructors to take their recruits to their max in physical endurance, but this is just absurd. Military training is just that, training, the teaching of skills, not blunt sadism and pointless machismo. Added to the fact that such traits are the base Gentile tribal preservation mechanisms and would have no place in a true Aryan National Socialist State.

Not exactly a subtle difference

The characters in the film can be seen on the right of the above photo with one exception: there are no white supremacists in the film, which is a good thing (and true to authentic NS), but everyone is still brutishly stupid. Also, the Federation's military is so equal that even women train along side men. While it is true that women are very able to serve in the military, even in combat roles, but full training equality is absurd. This goes back to the fundamental anatomical differences between the sexes and in the real World, to this day, basic training is kept gender segregated for this reason. Note that even sports events have different categories for male and female athletes - this is a fundamental law of nature, but Zion apparently thinks that it can break it or convince us to break it. Well, as with most things, it's a lie.

The training that the recruits do is also fairly ridiculous. Not only does the basic training facility look like a cheap movie set (continuing the media deception theme) but the recruits engage in no exercises that seem anything like the real combat that they will go on to face. Boot Camp cannot fully simulate combat scenarios, but they should at least engage in drills that resemble fighting giant bugs. Here, they play capture the flag with laser-tag guns and do a live-fire exercise that is so ridiculous that the accident that happens during it (a recruit gets his head blown off) should have been seen from a mile away. Also, the instructors should have been considered negligent for authorizing such a thing.

Things get even worse when we find out that the Federation's scientists actually know how to effectively combat the Bugs. Carl, who went into Military Intelligence, appears in a media clip, and this scientist quickly and effectively blasts a Bug's limb off and then gets a kill shot, while shooting from a distance at a Bug in a cage. He even says, "here's a tip, aim for the nerve center for a quick kill" before killing the caged creature. It sounds like he's giving advice on how to beat a video game. Not surprisingly, we next see a propaganda ad with kids squashing roaches as their mother fanatically cheers them on. Killing bugs, it's kid's play.

More Than A Bug Problem
This is then very much contrasted in the film's long and extremely gory combat scenes where apparently trained soldiers can't kill the Bugs in any sort of swift way, thus proving their training was poorly designed. The scientist took out the caged bug in two quick, well-aimed bursts of rifle fire, but the troops in the field literally spend hundreds of round on just one bug. And there are swarms of these things.

What's more, is that the Federation's military seems to fight by 1915 standards: deploy soldiers to a field, line them up, and charge! No tanks, no air support, no artillery, just rifles, grenades, though they do have nuclear powered bazookas. Once again, the educated National Socialist will see past the folly of this Zionist slam on what was without a doubt the best designed military of its time. The only one that didn't resort to blunt force trauma in both of the wars that have been used to label it as "infamous." If anyone still doubts that this is a slam on the German Military, then may they read this official trivia entry from IMDB: Nearly every military uniform has WW2 German military and SS paramilitary uniform references.

And this is a table with the shoulder boards of the Starship Troopers uniforms.

Hmm... guess to what they are alluding...

It is not just the training, but also the general activity that the soldiers engage in. When Johnny meets up with Carmen, who had gone to flight school, he is a bit jealous of her co-pilot, Zander who just so happens to be a former sports rival of Johnny's. The main thing here is the fact that Zander also clearly likes Carmen and proposes that he and Johnny duke it out to resolve their differences. Zander is clearly drunk in this scene as he hands off a whiskey glass to Carmen before the two start fighting in the middle of a crowded bar. Considering that Zander is an officer, this is shockingly bad conduct and would have seen him demoted if not booted from the service. The fight ends without another officer breaking it up (oddly, there's none in the huge crowd) and the two brawlers go their separate ways. To be more precise, Johnny goes to a tattoo parlor with some of his comrades and they all get skull tattoos with "Death Before Dishonor" written on them - another base reference to the Schutzstaffel. Perhaps this next part is coincidental, as it is a bit of a stretch, but Death Before Dishonor is a also an action film from 1987, one that vilifies Islam - ZC makes many such films!

ZioDelusion
The film's first major combat scene, which is also part of the introductory sequence, but cuts to "One Year Earlier" as a soldier sees his last. Well, it actually ends that said soldier is Johnny Rico at the end of a disastrous assault on a bug planet. Johnny is listed as KIA yet we see him to be alive in an advanced healing facility, more specifically in a pod that resembles a womb in which he floats and is reconstructed from his injuries. This also serves as another indicator of technological absurdity - advanced healing technology contrasted with the pitiful weapons technology that the soldiers use. However, there is another thing at play here: Johnny may very well be dead and living out a dream as this seems to suitably explain the rather ridiculous happy ending. The film's ending is also shown as a media event, and we already know that all media in the film is staged. Thus, Johnny is dead, but reborn via media propaganda and this allows him to carry out some of those crazy heroics that we see him do: like single handedly taking out that thing in the background.

Big Bug Problem

On the day that Johnny, Carmen and Carl agree to sign up for military service, they promise each other that they'll "always be friends." Given the large scale events that go on throughout the movie, the events that bring them together once again, are fairly far-fetched and seem more like a dream playing out. A dream where ZioFascism triumphs over disgusting bugs - Johnny's own media-deluded mind is just playing out a fantasy.

The reporter who dies in the very beginning of the film, and later when the sequence replays from Johnny point-of-view, is also the only one in the film who questions the purpose of the war on the Bugs. The invasion in the film starts when a large meteorite destroys Buenos Aires. We get the "news" from one of the many media clips throughout the film and it is obviously engineered with fire graphics to make an impression. Then graphic clips of destruction are used to pump everyone up for a war. It is pretty ridiculous to think that a meteor, from half a galaxy away, could be set on a course to impact Earth. Given the anti-meteor technology that the humans have (boasted about in one of the media propaganda clips) it makes one wonder why it conveniently failed to work this time. The one reporter who questions the Bugs' real motivations (the same one who gets diced in one of film's more graphic deaths), says that the Bugs only attack human settlers after they've stepped onto a Bug planet - hence, with the Aryan definition of violence, it is the humans who are guilty of it here and it is initiatory violence, which makes it all the more un-Aryan and not true National Socialist. This key part is, of course, not addressed by the film and we just see pumped up Ziofascists scream "kill 'em all!"

Conclusion
This was meant to be a slam against National Socialist Militarism, but it obviously is just a self-defeating flop from ZC Propaganda Inc. The film wasn't a hit at the box-office so at least this is one pack of lies that ZC didn't profit from. However, due to the high gore content, as well as some nude scenes, this film has found a niche in cult following and several video game versions have been made as well. Basically, something dumb has been made dumber, but with the current low state of the World's masses what can you really expect? The film just focuses on blunt sensationalism. Director Paul Verhoeven was born in 1938 in the Netherlands, thus had first hand experiences with Nazi occupation, though seeing that he was just a young boy, it is no surprise that he misunderstood pretty much everything that was going on around him. The impressionable young mind of his was then molded by decades of Zionist propaganda that made each and every hardship suffered during the occupation and war years seem like deliberate German treachery.

This film version also deviates considerably from the source novel, which goes into much more depth and discussion of the fictional world, the politics and philosophies of the Federation and the like. The book is often called more daring than the film for it examines a bit more thoroughly the concepts of fascism and the potential values of militarism (instead of just straight up vilifying it), but it is still far removed from being an Aryan literary work as it doesn't see the ideals let alone provide thoughts on how to work toward them as Hitler and the NSDAP did.

Verdict: The film is calculated reverse bluff from the minds of Zion. They try to show the audience how evil "fascists" are, but by breaking their empirical information monopoly, it can be seen that the Zionists are just trying to cover their own asses. And they fail.

Messages in Majdanek

I recently had an unexpected chance to go to the Zionist Propaganda Museum in Majdanek, just outside of Lublin, Poland. I took the opportunity and the visit was interesting, to say the least. By today, the city of Lublin has grown much and practically reaches vast open field that is the former internment camp from the Second World War, though this area was never really as far removed from urban areas as the other camps of its kind. The official information at the camp even makes note of this “exception.” On the way to the museum one can read the official name that has been given to this place, “Majdanek Museum of Martyrdom.” If you are coming from center city Lublin as I was, you have to drive along the aforementioned field for a while before coming to the main visitors' entrance. Along this stretch there is a great stone monument that will aptly sum up the rest of your visit: impact.

Not information, but impact. Be it visual or from the mouth of a tour guide, impression making tools await to mold your perceptions so that they are as guided as the tour itself.

The Majdanek camp was turned into a museum in August of 1944, well before the war even ended, and less than a month after the Soviets captured the area. This was done under the direct supervision of the Soviet Propaganda Machine, which would go on to serve as a main provider of "evidence" against the Schutzstaffel in 1945. Immediately local, regional and national publications churned out Soviet approved stories of what went on in the camp and all this information was promptly used to demonize the Nazis. This may also explain why Stalin was so intent on keeping Eastern Europe under his control, it gave him exclusive control over the so-called "death camps" and what evidence was extracted from them and then used against the Germans.

Interestingly, Majdanek is one of those infamous "death camps" that supposedly had a homicidal chamber and massive crematorium going on overtime to exterminate any and every person that the Nazis disapproved of. Let's take a look at the official camp tally.

Numbers Speak

78,000 dead. Given poor and dirty wartime conditions, which included a typhus epidemic and the Jews' own lack of cleanliness, this number can begin to make sense. Odd is the fact that the Polish word by this figure is “zgineło” meaning “died” (there is no “killing” implied), yet the English version, and the one most international tourists invariably read, implies murder. The other translated pairs match up accurately, says this native Polish speaker.

45,000 transferred to other camps. Wait, transferred? I thought this was a Nazi Murder Machine death camp? Hmm... maybe I was wrong.

500 escaped. Ah, yes, a few rogues are always to be found. Also, it seems security wasn’t that intense: escaping from a guarded labor camp that’s next to a militarily occupied city in the middle of an occupied country and remaining officially declared as escaped seems like the Germans were not so intent on killing everyone in this camp. In additon, nothing was mentioned about what these escapees said... did they testify at Nuremberg? To the Soviets? If so what did they say and what was done with that information? Did it just not align with the propaganda so it was swept under the rug and the escapees then sent by Stalin to Siberia so as to remain forever quiet? Questions, questions; ones that demand answers.

18,000 released. Ok, seriously. They actually release people from “death camps” now? Why would those fiendishly evil, mass-murdering Nazis hell-bent on genocide ever do that? Well, if they were not “hell-bent on genocide” than this board of numbers is starting to make sense.

1,500 liberated. The Soviets “saved” less people than the Nazis. How amusing. Though this was, in all probability, just the amount people who were there when the Soviets showed up and after the Nazis retreated. Many more were likely to have left the first chance they got, meaning right after the SS cleared out. There was a big city nearby to go to... why wait inside a prison then if the door’s open?

One should also note the numbers, all nicely rounded, thus making them estimates at best. Odd, that a world famous museum has a mistranslation and estimates as main parts of its information and message, especially since it exhibits a topic that countless scholars were said to have accurately studied and reported.

Also, back to that mistranslation, this was not the first time I had seen a suspicious mistranslation related to WW2 labor camps. I say suspicious since it effectively makes the information presented not objective. In the movie Shutter Island from 2010 there is some back story involving the Dachau Massacre and in the dialog the main character first says “death camp” in English and then in German as “Konzentrationlager.” Strange, since the German translates to simply “Concentration Camp” (the direct literal translation), but the term “Internment Camp” can also be used. Ever wonder why the Allied forces have “Concentration Camps” but the Germans have “Death Camps?” It’s WW2 Allied propaganda still in play and it has become firmly rooted into peoples’ psyche. Even if one looks at the fact that the German camps did have more death, especially towards the end of the war, it’s because German resources were stretched very thin and often down right destroyed from the air courtesy of the Allies and their aerial assaults even on civilian areas. Dresden would be the most infamous example from the latter category here: people flooded to the Saxon city as refugees as it remained the one major supply hub for civilians in the area, and then the city was bombed despite having no military or strategic importance. If civilians fared this well from the efforts of the “heroic” Allied forces, then how might you think prisoners had it?

Mistranslation here, misunderstanding there, white washing here, exaggeration there... WW2 history is plagued by these things and all those little mistakes play against the reputation of the Germans and those who were at arms with them. This cannot be a grand coincidence. It’s deliberate LIES.

The gate to the main compound in Majdanek has a sign that says, among other things, that no one under 14 years of age will be admitted. Given the horror stories visitors hear inside, this may very well be some good sense, but something else made me think different.

There was an Israeli student tour group at the camp and all the kids looked junior high school age more or less, 14 or just a bit older. Interesting fact of psychology is that kids learn quickest and are most impressionable when they are under 12. The brain is still developing and many childhood lessons go on to define the shape of the adult to come. Israel is insanely particular about controlling the flow of information pertaining to it or information that it has interest in. Just look at any one of the countless “controversial incidents” involving the IDF, the smell of a cover-up or lies seems to be practically synonymous with such things. Jack Bernstein, an American Jew (and a man who is clearly leaning more towards rationalism than Zionist Propaganda), was disgusted by Israeli power hungriness and lies, noted in his book that when he went to the supposed “haven” for Jews of the World, that tourism was strictly monitored, what people could see was tightly controlled, where they could go was very directed and under constant police supervision. Are we to believe that the Israeli educational system is all that different? Those kids when they are still under 12 must be drilled to the core with Holocaust lore and completely shaken up by all the gruesome Zionist hyperboles. Then when they finally come to these “museums” to “learn” the indoctrination doesn’t stop. Not at all.

There was a tour group of slightly older Polish students at Majdanek that day too and I linked up with them during one exhibit, the one containing the overview of the entire camp. The tour guide was being intensely emotional and his speech was punctuated with key words that go along with the museum's design of teaching by shock and instilling a desire for a passionate reaction of hate or some sort of defense from fear. This “tour guide” with his sorrowful voice amounting to cheesy dramatic acting said that the camp commandant would take his young daughter to see mass executions of Jews (of course Jews, always Jews) and would even strategically cross the camp with her so they’d go through as much ground as possible so that maybe she’d get a glimpse of a “random lynching that the SS often carried out” on one of the numerous gallows that were “all over the camp.” So apparently, the men of Schutzstaffel weren’t just mass-murdering psychopaths, they were also the World’s worst parents.

In the moment, when I heard the last word of that anecdote uttered, I was convinced that Zionist Propaganda lost some of its usual bad taste and picked up a whole lot of idiocy to compensate.

There is one section of the camp that has been kept standing and the normal tour path goes through it, however, there were renovations being done there, so I just happened to come across it on a day when it was closed. The workers were making a new stone walkway through the camp grounds. I did notice, however, that there were none of the aforementioned gallows to be seen. The area was being renovated, but only a walkway down the center was being placed, the buildings by which the “numerous gallows” were said to have been were not being worked on. Another flub in Zionist Propaganda, in all likelihood.

The last site to visit here is the flagship of the tour and of Holocaust lore: the crematorium, where the industrially efficient mass-murder was said to have taken place. First off, the standard for “death camp” is incredibly shaky... if Auschwitz is a “death camp” with 1,000,000 dead, then how does Majdanek even begin to compare with 78,000? Majdanek is a lot smaller, so that could explain some discrepancy and it does have one of those supposed “gas chambers,” thus it doesn’t matter how many people died, but how they died. Ok, fair enough. Let’s look at a gas chamber from the era of when this camp was in operation.

This article, from the Commitee for Open Debate On the Holocaust, is lengthy and gets into serious details, but in the beginning there is a nice explanation of 1920s and 1930s era gas chambers, including ones that used Zyklon-B. Also is worth noting that they were made by Degesch, a German company. Thus Adolf Hitler, being the Fuhrer, effectively had unlimited access to this technology if he so desired. As did Heinrich Himmler, the SS Reichsfuhrer who oversaw the entire penitentiary system of the Third Reich.

I can tell you, dear reader, that there is nothing in Majdanek that even begins to resemble such a large and complex machine. There are some ovens, standard mortuary ovens, that were used for cremation. It was a very necessary process to contain disease and likely ALL dead were cremated, SS Man and prisoner (the city morgue in Lublin had also been likely ordered to burn bodies), since corpses can harbor massive amounts of germs and disease, especially when people died from typhus or any other deadly disease and each body in the ground was basically a lethal germ warehouse. The Germans went so far as to be thorough that they dug up previously buried dead and started to cremate them... hence the pictures of mounds of dead and crematory ovens going overtime. It was a massive and frantic effort of sanitation that, for all intents and purposes, was meant to save lives of all those in the area - German soldier, Polish citizen, and all prisoners be they POWs, political detainees or Jews.

One major reason that the gas chamber horror story remains official history is due to Soviet propaganda, which had enormous Jewish contributions. Soviet Commissars were greeted by Jews when Stalin invaded Poland, because many of them were Jews themselves. In fact, why didn’t the West declare war on the USSR which invaded Poland like Germany? Well, the fact is that Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union. However, Hitler had freed German society and culture from the highly disproportionate and destructive influence of the Jews and was promptly branded as the Devil. The International Jew’s War was with the Germans and their Fuhrer, the USSR merely provided one of the front lines of attack. Fortunately, some rationalism remained in the West and after the war on that side of the Iron Curtain the so called “death camps” were forensically examined to reveal no homicidal gas chambers, but ones for standard fumigation purposes meant to prevent the spread of disease. The USSR leadership, to help keep the focus away from monstrous Soviet crimes, did not permit Western forensic investigators to inspect the “death camps” in Poland, nor did they carry out such an investigation by themselves. They just rebuilt (often clumsily) the destroyed parts of many of the camps to accentuate their own anti-German propaganda, which then played a key role in the Nuremberg Show Trials.

The large stone monument where the propaganda tour starts.

Today, it is being used as indoctrination information and that Israeli student tour group are in effect, its latest victims. They’re kids, they don’t know better and out of all the students on this planet who “learn” about the “Holocaust” it is those Israelis that probably get drilled like no other. First when they are impressionable young children under 12 at home, then they go on these school trips so that they can evoke their first passionate internal reactions. Then they will return home, finish high school, and go on to carry out their required military service, but by then they'll be packed with as much Jewish fanaticism, persecution myth and blind devotion to the blue hexagram as is possible. They are victims because they are being deliberately misinformed so that they can perpetuate the Zionist crimes and related madness. They are being primed to be hate-filled IDF criminals and then life-long Zionist fanatics.

The intensity of “education” can be seen even right during the tour. One girl started to cry, others sang a requiem of some sort by the crematorium ovens. There was also a little bit of vandalism that I spotted: there were these signs in a side room, shaped like gravestones, and each one had the name of one of the nationalities of “Holocaust” victims. The sign for The Germans was scratched and some of the letters had been scraped off. Some apt pupil had already learned what his masters want him to do.

Questioning the official mythos of this propaganda is a punishable crime in virtually every Western nation, except the United States where rational investigators are merely shunned, stigmatized, and passively secluded from their job, their peers, and the decent life the may have had before they asked a “wrong” question or two. Or reached an "improper" conclusion, however logical it may be. In Poland, an example of academic fortitude, Professor Dariusz Ratajczak, who published a booklet called “Tematy Niebezpieczne” (Eng. - “Dangerous Topics”) in March of 1999, which raised questions about the official Zionist Approved Story, saw his life disintegrate professionally and personally for just over 10 years until his murder, which was officially declared a suicide. The Israeli Mossad was known to be operating in Poland, a supposed ally to Israel, but the Zionists spy and perpetrate crimes against everyone, so are we really all that surprised?

There are still rationalist investigators for the truth working out there, like David Irving and Fredrick Toben. Both did time in prison and both push on in their mission of enlightening the World. They are also more known worldwide than Ratajczak was, so their prospective lethal subversion by the Mossad would not be as covert as the Zionist fanatics normally like their crimes to be.

Truth doesn’t fear investigation, yet “the Holocaust” does. What does that tell you? Even if you don’t see the folly of it all.

Aryanism - a misunderstood word and concept

Villification is an effective way to combat an enemy, since it is in effect, getting others to fight the enemy for you. With some carefully chosen words and images, hate can be incited and the masses will "remove" someone... sometimes literally, other times just through stigma.

Aryanism has suffered such a fate. In the eyes of the masses it is synonomous with hate and terror and war crime. It has been exceptionalized as the worst of the worst.

I once said "Irony's no slacker" and am continually surprised how right that turned out in many respects with one of those being Aryanism. I can't tell anyone what to think about it, if you are dead set on despising it, then as Aesop said, "a willful beast must go his own way." Not to belittle the reader, but in the original fable, the "beast" refers to a mule, though you can see the over-arching meaning at play; it can refer to any sentient creature.

Like the farmer in that fable, who tried to pull his mule back before it runs off, I will show the reader this -- http://aryanism.net/ -- a link to a website dedicated to Aryanism and how really a universalist and benevolent an idea it actually is.

Deep down most intelligent people know that the swastika isn't a hate symbol, but a sun symbol and it was very prevalent in many cultures before its villification. If the reader can at least accept that perhaps they'll be encouraged to take a step further on the website and read about "Aryan Race" -- another villified term -- and see that it too isn't about hate.

Perhaps the reader is ready to try and understand Aryanism, because only then will they be able to truly say that they accept it or decline it.