The Aryan Kampf in "Lord of the Rings" - Part II

Characters and Races

There is a great deal of character diversity in The Lord of the Rings with not only many protagonists, but also many races that live in Tolkien's Middle Earth. In general, each group has a particular region that it calls home and many characteristics that are unique to it. Some groups can be seen as outright good, others as bad, however there are also groups that cannot be generalized in this way and it is their key players that must be looked at.

Hobbits: The first group of Middle Earth inhabitants that we meet at length. The Hobbits are a cheerful bunch of villagers who like beer and festivities to excite their humble little life in the Shire. They are a well meaning humanist crowd. However, we soon learn that one of the Hobbits, Bilbo Baggins, actually has the long, lost Ring of Power and it has somewhat degraded him; he is now quite the recluse when compared to his festive kin and it is not an easy task to give up the Ring, he can clearly be seen to have become addicted to its presence. However, since Hobbits are good at heart, he does give it away on Gandalf the Wizard's wise orders and it is entrusted to his younger cousin, Frodo. Bilbo's actions, after having possessed the Ring for so long, seem to suggest that Hobbits are not mere Gentiles. Bilbo says of his kin: “Where our hearts truly lie is in peace and quiet and good-tilled earth." This strongly reflects the Aryan Farmer archetype.

Frodo is the Hobbit who rises to Arhat through his quest; his friends who accompany him certainly become Aryans through their enlightenment and intense experience. Frodo, Sam, Merry and Pippin learn about the vast expanse of the World in which they live, about the forces that have been driving it, and they take part in the Aryan Kampf to bring about a New Order in a New Age.

Gollum/Smeagol: He is a specific character and I mention him here, since Gollum is actually a degenerated Hobbit. He still goes by his old name Smeagol, including when talking about himself in the third person, but Gandalf refers to him as Gollum and so does Tolkien's text. This two-name theme reflects the character's dual nature of good and bad, which has now mixed into a degraded and corrupt unit. This character also parallels the Golem from Jewish lore, which was supposed to be a being created from inanimate materials, most often stone or clay, and then "activated" and meant to protect a Rabbi or a group of Jews from harm.

Gollum, when shown in the story, is very much associated with stone. There is the color of his skin, that fact that he is first scene in the Moria mine jumping from one stone to another, and in a brief scene of Gandalf explaining that Gollum was tortured by Orcs before being released it could certainly pass for him being "made" in a lab of some sort. Lastly, in The Two Towers, he is first seen crawling down a stone cliff and he is supposed to recover the Ring and thus protect the life-force of the Dark Lord Sauron. Also, Gollum doesn't seem to feel pain, which suggests his body is being artificially kept alive. He can be seen eating a fish at one point, but it also looks like he is just killing and munching it for his own amusement.

This many parallels in theme and imagery could not have been a coincidence. Thus the character's dual nature has two meanings. First, there is Smeagol, who is the ultimate example of Gentile corruption, driven to and dominated by love for gold, even to the point of neglecting his own body's well-being, let alone anyone else's. In a way, he is the polar opposite of the Hobbit Frodo. Second, there is Gollum, a soulless artificial goy built by Jews to serve Jews, but mainly to protect their artificially generated wealth and swindle.

Wizards: The race of wizards in the storyline is also presented with an opposing duality theme. First is the fact that there are two wizards, Gandalf the Grey and Saruman the White. Gandalf, is not led astray from Nobility, while Saruman succumbs to corruption. Thus each wizard takes on a second new form as the story progresses. The change is more metaphorical with Saruman who begins to serve Sauron (note that Saruman's staff resembles the Dark Tower), he goes through a change of character. With Gandalf, the change is more literal as he gets a change of body after risking himself to save others from the Balrog in Moria. The new Gandalf that emerges is now much more able bodied as evidenced in his fighting skills and capable of wielding more potent magic as he breaks Saruman's staff.

Gandalf, in a way, ascends to a position analogous to that of Arhat, while Saruman falls from his former post. In the film version this fall is quite literal as he plunges to his death from the top of Isengard. In the book, however, he reappears at the end in the Shire, which he transformed into a crude industrial complex - since he can no longer wield power by magic and divine knowledge, he makes machines to do it for him. In the end, however, he perishes the same with his slimy assistant who is very appropriately named Grima Wormtongue.

Elves: Elves are the purest race present in Middle Earth. They possess knowledge and wisdom like no other and it was Elven smiths who initially forged the Rings in with good intention of gaining knowledge about Middle Earth. The only Rings that were not tainted by Sauron were the ones belonging to the Elves, thus for all intents and purposes it is the Elves who know most about the Rings: how they work, how they should work, and are thus able to detect a corruption in the system. It is, the Elf Elrond who instructs the characters on how to destroy the Ring; the Elf Galadriel gives each member of the Fellowship a useful gift; the Elf Legolas is himself part of the Fellowship and his keen senses and archery skills help out greatly on many occasions. The Elves' graceful nature is reflected in how Legolas fights; it is rarely hand to hand, but rather with knowledge and foresight as seen in those impeccably launched arrows that never seem to miss their mark.

Men: The race of Men is most morally ambiguous. They may possess great knowledge and great ability, but are easily corrupted by prospects of power. This can be seen as early as the intro sequence to The Fellowship of the Ring where Isildur has the ability to destroy Sauron's power forever, but chooses to keep it for himself.

 

Elrond: Destroy it!

Isildur: ...No...

Needless to say, any attempt to rein in such a wild and savage force will end with... well, wildness and savagery; Isildur is soon ambushed by some men who also want the Ring and in the violence it is lost until Smeagol finds it at least a millennium later. Isildur's lust for power led to his own destruction and effectively kept Sauron’s life-force intact, thus the fate of Middle Earth is still potentially up for grabs by evil. There are men who are not so easily wooed by power, though.

Aragorn is noble at heart and has had Elven training thus is a very capable warrior as well as a wise leader. He is the heir of Isildur and ends up wielding his forefather’s broken sword (which Elrond had reforged) and playing a key role in the Kampf all the way to the very end at final battle at the Black Gate of Mordor. This great task which he approaches as a duty, effectively makes him an Arhat by the end of The Return of the King.

Theoden and the Men of Rohan are what we could call typical Gentiles. They are motivated to duty by imperative, not fully out of their own will, but they do mean good and dutifully fight the forces of evil, though at great cost - even King Theoden ends up falling in battle.

Denethor is the steward of Gondor, sitting in for the absent king, and this close position to power has corrupted his heart. He is unable to make clear and rational decisions and takes his anger out on his son, Faramir. The conflict between the men of Rohan and the men of Gondor is very illustrative of real world conflicts between groups of people - their disagreement is effectively a grudge, they refer to some past date and event that justifies not having to help the other, or justifies demanding help, but the point is that division is clearly leading them closer to doom.

Faramir and Boromir are brothers and sons to Denethor. Boromir ends up joining the Fellowship right after the Council of Elrond, while Faramir is introduced in The Two Towers as he happens to meet Frodo, Sam and Smeagol as they move around the mountain walls of Mordor. These two men show both major paths that Men (as a whole) take: both are within reach of great power, but as Boromir slowly begins to fall for it eventually winding up at his doom, Faramir begins to gradually understand why he must put his duty first and do his part in ensuring the destruction of the Ring. Every real world Gentile has these two options. The only question is will they take “Boromir’s Choice” or “Faramir’s Choice?” Note that Faramir’s Choice is harder and ends up requiring a great deal more persistence.

The other groups of men are the Men of the South and the Corsairs. Both are identified to be in Sauron’s service, thus have made Boromir’s Choice and just like for Boromir, it ends up spelling out their end.

There is also a group of ghosts, the Army of the Dead, men from a group of soldiers shamed for breaking their oaths of service. They are trapped in the confines of a mountain and the only thing that will ever see them redeemed is if a King of Gondor holds their oath fulfilled, which of course will require the completion of a great task to even consider as an option. These men are a good representation of the dangers of apathy and selfishness. When they abandoned their master, Isildur, in order to save themselves, they were, in effect, ready to accept slavery under Sauron. Now, after being cursed for millennia, they finally stand up to their duty. They prove that their honor is loyalty. Thus, Aragorn, rightful heir to the throne of Gondor, holds their oaths fulfilled and they are released from their curse and shame. The Army of the Dead’s passing is similar to Boromir’s, who in his last minutes repents and realizes that it was the Ring that seduced him, so he then fights to save Merry and Pippin from an ambush. He is struck down, but dies and passes on with honor. The Army of the Dead remained trapped in stone and only passing into Arya after their duty was done. Same end result as Boromir, just drawn out over thousands of years!

Dwarves: Great miners and craftsmen. They are somewhat similar to Hobbits, short and stocky, though much stronger and with great endurance. They are also adept at fighting as Gimli, a member of the Fellowship, demonstrates. Dwarves are less susceptible to corruption than men, as the fate of the seven who received the Ring in the prologue verse was somewhat different. Instead of becoming goys to the Dark Lord, the Rings worked up their greed for Gold, which they mined with increasing feverishness. It was Durin III who received the Ring, but it was his Son who inherited it and awoke the Balrog, a hibernating beast, in Moria, which promptly went on to be called “Durin’s Bane.”

Orcs: They are the primary soldiers in Sauron’s service. They have virtually no characterization or identifiable characters as they have very little to identify with in the first place. They are just brawlers and fighters who thirst for violence and plunder. They also seem to be cannibalistic and unable to feel pain or concern for anything; they are purely impulse and aggression driven beasts. The Uruk-Hai are an elite breed of Orcs that are taller and stronger. All Orcs, however, are made from Earthly materials, literally created out of the ground, which of course mirrors the golem concept and that is what Orcs are: a brigade of armed golems serving the Dark Lord.

The Dark Lord

Nazgul, the Ring-Wraiths: These demons are the top servants of the Dark Lord and the formerly great kings of men that received the nine Rings of Power (as mentioned in the prologue verse). Now they are totally corrupted and blindly subservient to Sauron. Their goal is the Ring, which they seek to bring it back to their master in order to give him his full power back. In story dynamics, these nine are a sort of Dark Fellowship or anti-Fellowship. A group committed to evil at all expense, while the Fellowship led by Gandalf is fully committed to good.

Other Things Fair and Foul
There are a great many elements to this grand tale, but I believe that the key ones have been addressed. However, here is a list of some minor characters that often have brief or parallel storylines to the main one.

Arwen: Elven Maiden and Daughter of Elrond. She and Aragorn are in love and she knows that despite her Elven immortality, Aragon will die as all men do. This creates a dilemma for her, whether to leave Middle Earth with the Elves or stay with a doomed love. Her storyline is interesting, in that it presents a variant on the slavery/preservation theme. By going with the Elves and leaving Aragorn, she would have eternal life, but no love... however, she chooses love, and inevitable death, over this choice of self-preservation.

Ents: Tree-beings from Fanghorn Forest that help bring down Isengard and Saruman who destroyed much of the forest to make way for his war machine.

Balrog: Huge beasts, one of which makes an appearance in the mines of Moria in The Fellowship of the Ring, the one known as “Durin’s Bane.” It would be just a passing danger, however, it bears relevance to the overall theme of the tale. First off, the Balrog can be seen as a projection of Sauron who we never see as he cannot walk the surface without his Ring of Power - the fire imagery is the best visual connection of these two. Note, the fire wasn’t present in the book as it is seen in the movie. In the book the Balrog has internal fire and is shrouded in dark and hence able to hide underground and unnoticed. The name “Durin’s Bane” was given since it can inidicate an event, a place, and not necessarily a creature as it was not known what killed the Dwarf-lord Durin until much later when the beast was actually seen.

Tolkien was also a master philologist and his love of words can be seen in the fact that good characters have elegant and well versed speech, while evil characters have very primitive language laced with curses and growls. It is also why he chose the name “Gollum” for the appropriately themed character. However, “Balrog” is another example of this naming theme. “Ba’al” was the first name the Jews used for their deified idol. Not surprisingly, in Christian lore (Tolkien was a Traditionalist Catholic and read from a Latin Bible even), “Baal” is a demon, an evil, often written with the full name “Baal Zebub” or “the Lord of the Flies.” “Beelzebub” is the Anglicized version of the word. Finally, “rog” is Hindi for “malady.” Thus, the “Balrog” is literally a “Lord of Sickness” - but a sickness that afflicts cultures, as can be seen in the destruction of the Moria Mine and Dwarf-Folk there. With this brief, but striking, image, JRR Tolkien united several languages and cultures to show the true demon visage of the Jew. This is exactly what the “Fellowship of the Ring” is, a multi-ethnic alliance rallying against their common affliction.

Here is some Applicability on the Matter


PART III

The Aryan Kampf in "Lord of the Rings" - Part I

Introduction 

The Lord of the Rings is perhaps one of the greatest epics ever written, certainly the greatest epic from the 20th Century, and will go down in the history as one of the great works of English language literature. Like all great works there are many levels of understanding that apply - kids' minds see an exciting adventure story, while the more educated perception sees profound metaphysical themes and a grand spiritual vision. Due to the large volume of the work, reading it once through is hardly enough, nor is seeing each film just once enough. The Lord of the Rings is a tale to read, reread (in full or in part) and to watch many times on the screen thanks to the superb film adaptations that came out between 2001 and 2003. This massive film project was produced as one film and then released in separate parts with each one roughly equating the respective book. Naturally, due to the differences between the literary and film mediums there are differences, though the extended editions, which came out on DVD fill in many of these gaps. However, the most important thing is that the films are true to Tolkien's themes, thus making most differences go virtually unnoticed by even many of those who read the book, though serious die hard fans have no doubt picked out and analyzed them.

This series of essays will not concern itself with those small matters and instead focus on the broad themes that run through the entire work. All story references will be to the film versions unless otherwise specified.

Overview
Due the nature of the work many people have come to see The Lord of the Rings as an allegory for Medieval Europe and Tolkien even drew from primarily Germanic mythology and legends to formulate much of his tale. Orcs, for one, are present in Germanic myth and the "Men of the South" (who appear in the Battle of Pelennor Fields) can be seen as a version of the Turks or possibly soldiers from Carthage. However, despite these apparent parallels remains the fact that Tolkien himself disapproved of allegorical interpretations of his work and claimed to have preferred "applicability." Since Tolkien did not provide an interpretation of his own, he thus wished for us readers to think about how the struggle he describes in his work applies to our real World. Like all great thinkers, he was ultimately encouraging discovery, instead of just reciting what he himself was taught.

"I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its prescence." ~J.R.R. Tolkien, forward to 'Fellowship of the Ring'

The many nations and characters that Tolkien describes in his books are therefore not stand-ins for any real World figure or nation, however this does not mean that their actions cannot parallel the real World. Tolkien so precisely constructed such a vast fictional universe so that he could have as much creative freedom as was possible when it came to communicating ideas and themes. Fiction often draws from real events or writers and artists "get inspired" by real events and are always seeking "inspiration" etc... Tolkien went beyond this... he created his own universe so that when it came time to create the fictional story, his inspiration was drawn from purely metaphysical concepts. He took storytelling to a very grand spectrum, one with a high quality fiction (a pure artistic fiction) on one side and for the other side he dug deep into the throes of reality (way past the typical surface story) and down to the fundamentals that are at its base. This can be seen in the great variety of the characters and their motivations and the complex nature of the conflict at hand. Think of any popular book or movie out in the mass media, if it is "inspired by real events" it usually is just a surface level examination of what really goes on - it boils down to good and bad, right and wrong, and all of the approved simplifications. However, Tolkien's conflict has that critical third side making it actually a three-sided conflict. Many of the story's audience do not notice this since as they watch or read, they simply see a battlefield with two armies, one good one bad, but they fail to notice the motivations that led to this battle as well as what is not on the battlefield; conflict is not limited to physical fighting. Thus, Tolkien's epic is not "inspired by real events" but rather inspired by genuine concepts of the life, the universe, and everything.

The Rings
These are the crux of the story's symbolism and in particular it is the Ring of Power that is the very center of action. The Ring is far from just a MacGuffin or a simple metaphor for the source of power to drive the story forward, it has an applicability to our very real World.

First, we can see that the Ring is made of Gold, which has been the source of greed and power throughout the course of history. In the prologue, each race is given a certain number of rings that were created by Elven smiths. Presumably the number is in proportion to the population of each race in Middle Earth to make the different amounts seem fair. However, in secret, the Dark Lord Sauron forges one ring, the Ring of Power, all for himself and he puts so much energy into it that his life force is dependant on the Ring's survival; without it, he'll be in limbo - with it's destruction he'll perish - however when wearing it, when the illusion is in play, he has a massive source of power that allows him to raise armies and plunder all there is to reap.

In our World, what does this Ring metaphor apply to? Nothing other than Fiat money, which at the time of the tale's writing was backed by gold. In our real World, the money system we have is an illusion of power that works out the same way that Tolkien's rings do. The illusion is the key that keeps the system going as people believe that they have an actual say and can exert actual influence with their power. The reality is, that from the shadows there is the real power that only issues loans on power and freedom, and these loans are what nations are all bound to.

"Three Rings for the Elven kings under the sky,
Seven Rings for Dwarf lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Mordor where the Shadows lie."

Interestingly, there is a work by Richard Wagner called The Ring of Nibelung, in which the protagonist, Alberich, is told that if he forges a ring out of a trove of gold that rests on the bottom of the Rhine he will have all the power in the World. The only catch is that he must renounce the power of love.

"The World as heirloom would I gain!
And if I cannot have Love
Might I not cunningly extort Lust?
The Light will I extinguish for you
The Gold will I tear from the reef
And forge the avenging Ring!
Let the Waves be my witness:
FOREVER HAVE I CURSED LOVE!"

Wagner also had this to say about a particular group of people:
"You ask me about Jewry. I felt a long-repressed hatred for them, and this hatred is as necessary to my nature as gall is to blood. An opportunity arose when their damnable scribbling annoyed me most, and so I broke forth at last. It seems to have made a tremendous impression, and that pleases me for I really wanted only to frighten them in this manner. Because it is certain that not our princes, but the bankers and Philistines are nowadays our masters..." (Correspondence between Wagner and Liszt, Volume I, pg.145, 18th April, 1851)

Oddly, Tolkien said that his Ring and Wagner's Ring are only alike in their round appearance. Yet, in theme they are practically one and the same. In The Return of the King, the opening flashback scene even shows the Ring being found at the bottom of a river or lake. So many parallels cannot be dismissed as "coincidence" though that is a favorite way of the Jew to write off patterns that he finds inconvenient.

If that wasn't enough, Tolkien added some of his own traits to the Ring, most notably that it has an inscription that can only be seen if the Ring is held to fire. Hmm... writing and fire. Does that say something about the nature of this Ring? Well, according to Jew lore on the creation of the universe, the Creator first inscribed the letters of the alphabet with a pen of fire before going on to writing everything into existence. So the Ring is just a symbol for Judaic beliefs. Note that all of Sauron's creations are dependant on this Ring, once it gets annihilated, they all perish along with their Dark Master. It is very true that by manipulating gold one cannot control the World. The Jew, however, seems to stubbornly disagree.

On a side note: a certain ringleader in propagating the Talmudic nature of our Universe and the Life-Force in it, is one Richard Dawkins who wrote a book called The God Delusion. Now, while I agree with Dawkins that many so-called "believers" are quite delusional, it is them and not the idea of God, a Creator, Allah, a Divinity or whatever arbitrary name one wishes to give It. Words are nothing compared to the greatness of the Idea they attempt to explore. That Idea is the energy for the Aryan Metaphysical Drive. The Jew has no such thing and may I recommend to him the book called The Gold Delusion!

Actually, this is the real "Gold Delusion."

The Dark Lord
Sauron is the one who secretly forged the illusion of power known simply as the Ring of Power (the only "power" it really has is the third word in name arbitrarily given to it), and he can be seen, on a simplistic level, as a Devil figure. But just what is this idea known as the Devil, Satan, or whatever arbitrary name one wishes to give it?

The first clue as to what Sauron can apply to in our World can be seen on the original cover of The Two Towers. These covers were hand drawn by Tolkein himself, thus their symbolism can only be his intention. The cover in question is in the middle, with a white tower and moon on the left, a flying entity in the middle, and a black tower and pentagram on the right. Note the three prongs on the black tower. In the film version this tower actually has four prongs, but this is a 2-D sketch, not 3-D graphics where the obvious fourth prong is visible, while in the sketch the middle one hides it. The top of the black tower also contain the Eye of Sauron that allows to the Devil to see the Earth, a periscope of sorts from the infernal domain. This brings up to...

...Baphomet! Note the recurring images here, albeit in the different overall composition: the moon, tower on its head, the star, a corresponding black and white theme and the wings. The black and white theme also demonstrates that the Dark Lord has two Forces at his disposal. One, his own army created from black magic; two, the corrupted ones that he lured and bribed over to his side. Thus, the whole conflict is THREE SIDED - good, bad, and ugly.




If Sauron is applicable to Baphomet, then who exactly is the latter? A very interesting question and one very revealing quote begins to shed light as to the answer. Note that the Jew calls his idol "Yhwh" and the word "tetragrammaton" (literally: "four letter word") may be used as a substitute to mean "Yhwh." If anyone has seen the film Equilibrium (which I reviewed on this blog), they can grasp the nature of what many believe "Yhwh" stands for.

"The image of Yahweh Elohim had been transformed. No longer just the One Supreme God worshipped by the earliest Israelite tribes, he was now a revengeful, partisan deity, with a special people identified by their separateness. Of significance may be the prevalent conception of Yahweh seen in the period of the Maccabees in the second century B.C. Judean Maccabee amulets of around 100 B.C. depict IAWA or IAWAHH (Yahweh) as snake-footed - two monstrous serpents below the torso - and wielding a whip."

Notice any similarities to Baphomet? There are those serpents below the torso. The "people identified by their separateness" is a spot on description of the Jews. Then, of course, there is the fact that the Jews call their deity "Yahweh" or "Yhwh." Little do most people know, that this being is actually the Devil. The full text from where that quote comes from can be found here.

Next, we'll get into specific characters and how they fit into the Three-Sided Conflict that is tearing through Middle Earth.

PART II

Traces of Aryanism in a Heavy Metal Song

In my post on the Storytelling Front of the ongoing Aryan Kampf, I mentioned that littles bits of Aryanism can be seen in many places and, perhaps, even in greatly unexpected places. Films and television programs are perhaps the easiest place to look as they are both very popular and, in general, very available mediums. However, I'd like to introduce another medium here: music. Most people tend to enjoy music like they do movies, on a simple level. This means that they don't explore deeper themes that surely the creating artist must have been aware of or even outright intended to convey.

Metallica have been a popular band ever since their debut album from 1983 entitled Kill 'em All was released. On a surface level examination, they write pretty standard heavy metal music with all the fast riffing, blazing solos and pounding bass and drums that heavy metal fans get a kick out of. However, their enduring success seems to suggest that there is something more about them and in particular their music. Many bands come and go, many are just one hit wonders, and even many of those that have a lengthy career rarely reach as many people as Metallica. Surely luck plays a part, but it can't explain all of Metallica's success. There is a profound artistry to many of their songs, especially from albums before 1991, that most heavy metal bands never even come close to achieving.

Guitarist, front man and main song writer, James Hetfield, was raised in a strict Christian household and religious motifs can be seen in his lyrics. Songs like "The Four Horsemen" may be obvious, but many more contain much more universal spiritual and metaphysical aspects. It's an element of Metallica's music that most headbanging heavy metal fans probably don't pick up.

Here are the complete lyrics to the song "...and Justice for All." Read and Listen.

Halls of Justice Painted Green
Money Talking
Power Wolves Beset Your Door
Hear Them Stalking
Soon You'll Please Their Appetite
They Devour
Hammer of Justice Crushes You
Overpower

The Ultimate in Vanity
Exploiting Their Supremacy
I Can't Believe the Things You Say
I Can't Believe
I Can't Believe the Price You Pay
Nothing Can Save You

Justice Is Lost
Justice Is Raped
Justice Is Gone
Pulling Your Strings
Justice Is Done
Seeking No Truth
Winning Is All
Find it So Grim
So True
So Real

Apathy Their Stepping Stone
So Unfeeling
Hidden Deep Animosity
So Deceiving
Through Your Eyes Their Light Burns
Hoping to Find
Inquisition Sinking You
With Prying Minds

The Ultimate in Vanity
Exploiting Their Supremacy
I Can't Believe the Things You Say
I Can't Believe
I Can't Believe the Price You Pay
Nothing Can Save You

Justice Is Lost
Justice Is Raped
Justice Is Gone
Pulling Your Strings
Justice Is Done
Seeking No Truth
Winning Is All
Find it So Grim
So True
So Real

Lady Justice Has Been Raped
Truth Assassin
Rolls of Red Tape Seal Your Lips
Now You're Done in
Their Money Tips Her Scales Again
Make Your Deal
Just What Is Truth? I Cannot Tell
Cannot Feel

The Ultimate in Vanity
Exploiting Their Supremacy
I Can't Believe the Things You Say
I Can't Believe
I Can't Believe the Price We Pay
Nothing Can Save Us

Justice Is Lost
Justice Is Raped
Justice Is Gone
Pulling Your Strings
Justice Is Done
Seeking No Truth
Winning Is All
Find it So Grim
So True
So Real
Seeking No Truth
Winning Is All
Find it So Grim
So True
So Real

The song has obvious political themes as it describes corruption in the justice system. The line that stands out the most is the first line of the chorus, it is repeated three times throughout the song: "The Ultimate in Vanity." Does that by any chance remind the reader of a particular group often discussed here? From that view point, doesn't the rest of the song seem to make a profound sense? Like in They Live there is no direct and obvious connection to the International Jew, but isn't it interesting how well these lyrics describe him?

The lines "apathy their stepping stone" and "inquisition sinking you with prying minds" are also particularly relevant to the reality of the Zionist crime network, which proceeds if people are apathetic to their parasitizing of the World, though invariably most people are simply not aware of it. This means that few are actually fighting against Zionism and thus the aforementioned "inquisition" can readily "sink" them with "prying minds" - mearly disagreeing with the ZC approved version of history is a crime in many nation states.

Note that the third time the chorus is repeated, there is slight change in the lyrics. The "I can't believe the price you pay" becomes "I can't believe the price we pay." This is precisely what is "so grim, so true, so real." Everyone suffers and apathy is effectively suicide by way of sloth.

The song is the title track to Metallica's 1988 album. Note the cover art:

Just who is pulling those ropes?
And who is overloading those scales with funny money?

The cover art has a dual meaning, as the falling statue can also be seen as the fall of art and culture from excessive commercialization. After all, it is a classical marble rendition of Lady Justice. The album name in the corner looks as if it was spray painted and that is essentially blunt vandalism, but given the wider themes in the image, it is vandalism of not just justice, but also of art, of culture; in short vandalism of vital aspects of Nobility.

Overall though, Metallica's music, as well as that of any other band in the mainstream, is not genuinely Aryan. The traces of Aryanism are likely just general attempts to convey honor and to look at corruption, but given the rock and roll lifestyle - Metallica's nickname for a while was "Alcoholica" due to their drunken reputation, even on stage - these musings amount to basically just wishful thinking. A typical slave wants to be free or richer or anything to improve his present state, but what does he really do? He just keeps on working so as not to get beaten. Wishful thinking doesn't accomplish anything by itself. Metallica have never been activists nor have they deserted from the formation put together by their corporate masters to pursue the messages in their songs, thus it must be asked, do they actually believe in them?

Music can be a very powerful medium and I propose that a Pan-Aryan anthem be composed. Perhaps an update of "Die Fahne Hoch" the classic NSDAP anthem to which I translated and updated the lyrics. However, that work is a piece of history and the anthem suggested above may very well be a new composition altogether. Though an updated musical arrangement/remix of the classic "Horst Wessel Lied" would be great! I suggest consulting the main theme to the Aryan themed film Cutthroat Island (I also wrote about the film on this blog) to see just how powerful music can be. The many versions of the NSDAP anthem that I have found online do not come very close to matching the musical power of this piece. This Aryanist thinks that it's about time that changed.

One Example of Idiocy in the Mass Media

One of my dense Polish-American kin, Alex Storozynski, wrote this article on his Huffington Post blog. I used to respect Storozynski as he is passionate promoter of Polish culture in the New York area. He usually tries to get Polish-Americans to reconnect with their native land and culture without too much in your face nationalist pandering. However, with this little number, he has proven himself to be a hopeless goy, doomed to delusion.

The media's slander of Poland: Ignorance, lazy editing, or malicious libel?
By Alex Storozynski

The New York-born Chief Rabbi of Poland, Michael Schudrich, says, "Accusing Poles of participation in the Holocaust is a sin." Yet on a regular basis, American journalists do just that by calling Auschwitz a "Polish concentration camp." This is Holocaust revisionism.

SoE: The correct term here would be "incorrect" or "inaccurate Holocaust revisionism." The reasons for this are, of course, way above Storozynski's head which is packed with gas chamber myths and other assorted nightmares. Also it is worth noting that Storozynski automatically assumes revisionism is a bad thing.

The Nazi concentration camps were built by Germans, run by Germans, and guarded by Germans. The victims of those camps were Polish. Newspaper editors justify use of the term "Polish concentration camp" as geographical shorthand for "a German concentration camp in occupied Poland." But this shorthand is Orwellian doublespeak that turns victim into perpetrator and distorts history. It perpetuates ignorance about the Holocaust and gives impressionable readers the idea that Poles built the camps. The Auschwitz killing factory was a product of German engineering, and both Polish Jews and Catholics were murdered there.

SoE: Actually they were built by prisoners of the Germans, which included Poles and Jews. Victims (of the typhus epidemic) were everyone, though the Polish Jews with their fear of showering and general lack of cleanliness succumbed to disease more than others in the supposed "killing factory" that they helped build.

Ironically, Storozynski is the victim and perpetuator of Orwellian doublespeak as he holds myth as reality and fails to see it. Goy.

On Sept. 1, 1939, the German blitzkrieg stormed into Poland to burn down cities, enslave the populace, build gas chambers to murder Jews and execute Christian Poles that helped them. Two weeks later, Soviet Russia sent tanks into eastern Poland to execute the leadership and destroy its capitalist system. Poland fought Nazi Germany longer than any other country and the Germans used Auschwitz to kill Polish soldiers and political prisoners, before constructing gas chambers to murder Jews.

SoE: So now the Germans invaded Poland just so they could build gas chambers? Despite the fact that they had their own, ones they NEVER used for murder. Read up on the German company Degesch that manufactured large gas chambers for fumigating rail cars and then see that those small stone rooms in Auschwitz, Majdanek and other camps look nothing like them.

At least, Storozynski is right in saying that the USSR invaded Poland, it's true, but he fails to see why the great Western Allies didn't declare war on the Soviet invader like they did on the German.

And actually, the USSR fought Germany longer than Poland, as did the Western Allies, but maybe Storozynski just used shorthand for "Poland fought Nazi Germany longer than any other country at the start of war" despite the fact that he admitted to not approving of shorthand due to the inaccuracies it causes.

Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, "in the big lie there is a certain force of credibility, because the broad masses of a nation are easily corrupted ... and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie."

SoE: Yes, Hitler did write that, but maybe you'd care for context and accuracy? That part of the quote DOES NOT end with a period, there is a comma and the quote continues:

"...since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick-a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of.

The foremost connoisseurs of this truth regarding the possibilities in the use of falsehood and slander have always been the Jews; for after all, their whole existence is based on one single great lie, to wit, that they are a religious community."

Der Fuhrer was talking about the Jew's method of lying and not about his own Noble Kampf. Goys never learn.

Hitler vowed to get rid of "Jews, Polacks and riff-raff." He would be pleased that today American newspapers blame Poles for his Nazi death camps rather than the Germans. The Nazis themselves gave the camp a German name, "Auschwitz" and then hung a sign over the entrance in German, "Arbeit Macht Frei." Calling it Polish is either lazy or malicious.

This past week, on Oct. 20, The New York Times ran an obituary of Dr. George Mathe, which said that he had been sent to "a Polish concentration camp in a cattle car." The shifting blame is getting so bad that in June, The Los Angeles Times even ran a piece in which its "Culture Monster" reviewer F. Kathleen Foley used the phrase "Nazi Poland." This is libelous. The Los Angeles Times corrected the mistake on its web site. In May, The Wall Street Journal used the phrase "Polish concentration camp." Polish-Americans protested outside the newspaper's offices, however The Wall Street Journal refuses to remove the defamatory phrase from its web site. The Polish Consul General in New York, Ewa Junczyk-Ziomecka wrote a letter to the editor saying that the Journal is "indicating that Poland was a participant in the Nazi crime. In reality, my country was Hitler's most brutalized victim with more than six million Polish citizens losing their lives during the war."

Of the six million Poles killed during World War II, about half were Jewish while the rest were Christian. German soldiers also transported Jews from 27 other countries into Nazi occupied-Poland to be murdered in deaths camps like Auschwitz. Because Poland resisted Germany, Hitler ordered his army to bomb and burn Warsaw to the ground.

SoE: More "death camp" nonsense. Also, it's a tough pill to swallow, but Poland could have saved herself by not ignoring Hitler and actually negotiating with him on his demands. Love him or hate him, Hitler was your neighboring leader and instead of making shady deals with Churchill and DeGaulle, my dear and beloved, but sometimes painfully naive Homeland, you should have not ignored your neighbor. One who proved to be very capable and who could have helped you fend off Soviet aggression.

This issue of historic accuracy was taken up by the United Nations, and in 2007, UNESCO officially changed the name of the Auschwitz to "The Auschwitz-Birkenau German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945)."

SoE: Well that's an unpleasant mouthful that the Jews force fed us.

Jewish leaders have also spoken out on this issue. In Jan. 2005, Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, David A. Harris, issued a statement which said in part, "We would also like to remind those who are either unaware of the facts or careless in their choice of words, as has been the case with some media outlets, that Auschwitz-Birkenau and the other death camps, including Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka, were conceived, built and operated by Nazi Germany and its allies. The camps were located in German-occupied Poland, the European country with by far the largest Jewish population, but they were most emphatically not 'Polish camps'. This is not a mere semantic matter. Historical integrity and accuracy hang in the balance."

SoE: LOL! A nightmare perpetuating Zionist Jew talking about "historical accuracy." This may very well have just made my day.

In April 2006, Executive Director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham H. Foxman, wrote: "As an agency which prioritizes remembrance of the Holocaust, we share Poland's concerns over the frequent description of the camp as a "Polish" camp. Such a description implies that the camp was built in the name of the Polish people. As you know, this is manifestly not the truth. Auschwitz stands as a monument to the barbarity of Nazi Germany. We therefore respectfully request that the camp be officially referred to as the 'Former Nazi German Extermination Camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau.' "

While there were Poles who committed atrocities against Jews during and after World War II, the Polish government convicted and executed those who killed Jews. The Polish underground established the Council to Aid Jews, Zegota, which rescued thousands of Jews. Irena Sendler saved 2,500 Jewish children from the Warsaw ghetto. Jan Karski sneaked through enemy lines to beg Churchill & Roosevelt to stop the Holocaust. They did nothing. Polish Army Captain Witold Pilecki volunteered to be arrested by the Germans and sent to Auschwitz to try to organize a prison break. The Germans executed thousands of Poles who tried to save Jews. The phrase "Polish concentration camp" desecrates their memory.

SoE: Goy Storozynski has been effectively conditioned to believe that disgust with Jews is completely unfounded and irrational. He also thinks that ethnic Russians (albeit Soviets) were responsible for the massacre at Katyn, which decapitated the leadership of Poland. It was, in fact, atheistic Jews that were the majority of Soviet Commissars. He also fails to see that Germans could have easily done the same kind of mass-killing in their half of newly conquered Poland, but didn't.

The Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita has published editorials calling for legal action against newspapers that use these defamatory phrases. But it doesn't have to end this way. Newspaper publishers and the Associated Press can easily rectify this situation by changing their stylebooks to banish the phrase "Polish concentration camps."

Some editors justify the use of this phrase as a geographic location of the camps. But while editors can find lots of reasons to avoid doing the right thing and banning these phrases from news stories, there are six million reasons why they should.

SoE: The only reason these phrases are "defamatory" is because your perception of WW2 is hopelessly misguided. The phrases should be corrected, yes, but not to stop defamation, but to make them accurate. This also involves getting rid of death camp lore. Six million lies is enough.

---------------------------------------------------------
Article originally published on October 24th, 2010 in the blog section of The Huffington Post.
---------------------------------------------------------

Messages in Majdanek

I recently had an unexpected chance to go to the Zionist Propaganda Museum in Majdanek, just outside of Lublin, Poland. I took the opportunity and the visit was interesting, to say the least. By today, the city of Lublin has grown much and practically reaches vast open field that is the former internment camp from the Second World War, though this area was never really as far removed from urban areas as the other camps of its kind. The official information at the camp even makes note of this “exception.” On the way to the museum one can read the official name that has been given to this place, “Majdanek Museum of Martyrdom.” If you are coming from center city Lublin as I was, you have to drive along the aforementioned field for a while before coming to the main visitors' entrance. Along this stretch there is a great stone monument that will aptly sum up the rest of your visit: impact.

Not information, but impact. Be it visual or from the mouth of a tour guide, impression making tools await to mold your perceptions so that they are as guided as the tour itself.

The Majdanek camp was turned into a museum in August of 1944, well before the war even ended, and less than a month after the Soviets captured the area. This was done under the direct supervision of the Soviet Propaganda Machine, which would go on to serve as a main provider of "evidence" against the Schutzstaffel in 1945. Immediately local, regional and national publications churned out Soviet approved stories of what went on in the camp and all this information was promptly used to demonize the Nazis. This may also explain why Stalin was so intent on keeping Eastern Europe under his control, it gave him exclusive control over the so-called "death camps" and what evidence was extracted from them and then used against the Germans.

Interestingly, Majdanek is one of those infamous "death camps" that supposedly had a homicidal chamber and massive crematorium going on overtime to exterminate any and every person that the Nazis disapproved of. Let's take a look at the official camp tally.

Numbers Speak

78,000 dead. Given poor and dirty wartime conditions, which included a typhus epidemic and the Jews' own lack of cleanliness, this number can begin to make sense. Odd is the fact that the Polish word by this figure is “zgineło” meaning “died” (there is no “killing” implied), yet the English version, and the one most international tourists invariably read, implies murder. The other translated pairs match up accurately, says this native Polish speaker.

45,000 transferred to other camps. Wait, transferred? I thought this was a Nazi Murder Machine death camp? Hmm... maybe I was wrong.

500 escaped. Ah, yes, a few rogues are always to be found. Also, it seems security wasn’t that intense: escaping from a guarded labor camp that’s next to a militarily occupied city in the middle of an occupied country and remaining officially declared as escaped seems like the Germans were not so intent on killing everyone in this camp. In additon, nothing was mentioned about what these escapees said... did they testify at Nuremberg? To the Soviets? If so what did they say and what was done with that information? Did it just not align with the propaganda so it was swept under the rug and the escapees then sent by Stalin to Siberia so as to remain forever quiet? Questions, questions; ones that demand answers.

18,000 released. Ok, seriously. They actually release people from “death camps” now? Why would those fiendishly evil, mass-murdering Nazis hell-bent on genocide ever do that? Well, if they were not “hell-bent on genocide” than this board of numbers is starting to make sense.

1,500 liberated. The Soviets “saved” less people than the Nazis. How amusing. Though this was, in all probability, just the amount people who were there when the Soviets showed up and after the Nazis retreated. Many more were likely to have left the first chance they got, meaning right after the SS cleared out. There was a big city nearby to go to... why wait inside a prison then if the door’s open?

One should also note the numbers, all nicely rounded, thus making them estimates at best. Odd, that a world famous museum has a mistranslation and estimates as main parts of its information and message, especially since it exhibits a topic that countless scholars were said to have accurately studied and reported.

Also, back to that mistranslation, this was not the first time I had seen a suspicious mistranslation related to WW2 labor camps. I say suspicious since it effectively makes the information presented not objective. In the movie Shutter Island from 2010 there is some back story involving the Dachau Massacre and in the dialog the main character first says “death camp” in English and then in German as “Konzentrationlager.” Strange, since the German translates to simply “Concentration Camp” (the direct literal translation), but the term “Internment Camp” can also be used. Ever wonder why the Allied forces have “Concentration Camps” but the Germans have “Death Camps?” It’s WW2 Allied propaganda still in play and it has become firmly rooted into peoples’ psyche. Even if one looks at the fact that the German camps did have more death, especially towards the end of the war, it’s because German resources were stretched very thin and often down right destroyed from the air courtesy of the Allies and their aerial assaults even on civilian areas. Dresden would be the most infamous example from the latter category here: people flooded to the Saxon city as refugees as it remained the one major supply hub for civilians in the area, and then the city was bombed despite having no military or strategic importance. If civilians fared this well from the efforts of the “heroic” Allied forces, then how might you think prisoners had it?

Mistranslation here, misunderstanding there, white washing here, exaggeration there... WW2 history is plagued by these things and all those little mistakes play against the reputation of the Germans and those who were at arms with them. This cannot be a grand coincidence. It’s deliberate LIES.

The gate to the main compound in Majdanek has a sign that says, among other things, that no one under 14 years of age will be admitted. Given the horror stories visitors hear inside, this may very well be some good sense, but something else made me think different.

There was an Israeli student tour group at the camp and all the kids looked junior high school age more or less, 14 or just a bit older. Interesting fact of psychology is that kids learn quickest and are most impressionable when they are under 12. The brain is still developing and many childhood lessons go on to define the shape of the adult to come. Israel is insanely particular about controlling the flow of information pertaining to it or information that it has interest in. Just look at any one of the countless “controversial incidents” involving the IDF, the smell of a cover-up or lies seems to be practically synonymous with such things. Jack Bernstein, an American Jew (and a man who is clearly leaning more towards rationalism than Zionist Propaganda), was disgusted by Israeli power hungriness and lies, noted in his book that when he went to the supposed “haven” for Jews of the World, that tourism was strictly monitored, what people could see was tightly controlled, where they could go was very directed and under constant police supervision. Are we to believe that the Israeli educational system is all that different? Those kids when they are still under 12 must be drilled to the core with Holocaust lore and completely shaken up by all the gruesome Zionist hyperboles. Then when they finally come to these “museums” to “learn” the indoctrination doesn’t stop. Not at all.

There was a tour group of slightly older Polish students at Majdanek that day too and I linked up with them during one exhibit, the one containing the overview of the entire camp. The tour guide was being intensely emotional and his speech was punctuated with key words that go along with the museum's design of teaching by shock and instilling a desire for a passionate reaction of hate or some sort of defense from fear. This “tour guide” with his sorrowful voice amounting to cheesy dramatic acting said that the camp commandant would take his young daughter to see mass executions of Jews (of course Jews, always Jews) and would even strategically cross the camp with her so they’d go through as much ground as possible so that maybe she’d get a glimpse of a “random lynching that the SS often carried out” on one of the numerous gallows that were “all over the camp.” So apparently, the men of Schutzstaffel weren’t just mass-murdering psychopaths, they were also the World’s worst parents.

In the moment, when I heard the last word of that anecdote uttered, I was convinced that Zionist Propaganda lost some of its usual bad taste and picked up a whole lot of idiocy to compensate.

There is one section of the camp that has been kept standing and the normal tour path goes through it, however, there were renovations being done there, so I just happened to come across it on a day when it was closed. The workers were making a new stone walkway through the camp grounds. I did notice, however, that there were none of the aforementioned gallows to be seen. The area was being renovated, but only a walkway down the center was being placed, the buildings by which the “numerous gallows” were said to have been were not being worked on. Another flub in Zionist Propaganda, in all likelihood.

The last site to visit here is the flagship of the tour and of Holocaust lore: the crematorium, where the industrially efficient mass-murder was said to have taken place. First off, the standard for “death camp” is incredibly shaky... if Auschwitz is a “death camp” with 1,000,000 dead, then how does Majdanek even begin to compare with 78,000? Majdanek is a lot smaller, so that could explain some discrepancy and it does have one of those supposed “gas chambers,” thus it doesn’t matter how many people died, but how they died. Ok, fair enough. Let’s look at a gas chamber from the era of when this camp was in operation.

This article, from the Commitee for Open Debate On the Holocaust, is lengthy and gets into serious details, but in the beginning there is a nice explanation of 1920s and 1930s era gas chambers, including ones that used Zyklon-B. Also is worth noting that they were made by Degesch, a German company. Thus Adolf Hitler, being the Fuhrer, effectively had unlimited access to this technology if he so desired. As did Heinrich Himmler, the SS Reichsfuhrer who oversaw the entire penitentiary system of the Third Reich.

I can tell you, dear reader, that there is nothing in Majdanek that even begins to resemble such a large and complex machine. There are some ovens, standard mortuary ovens, that were used for cremation. It was a very necessary process to contain disease and likely ALL dead were cremated, SS Man and prisoner (the city morgue in Lublin had also been likely ordered to burn bodies), since corpses can harbor massive amounts of germs and disease, especially when people died from typhus or any other deadly disease and each body in the ground was basically a lethal germ warehouse. The Germans went so far as to be thorough that they dug up previously buried dead and started to cremate them... hence the pictures of mounds of dead and crematory ovens going overtime. It was a massive and frantic effort of sanitation that, for all intents and purposes, was meant to save lives of all those in the area - German soldier, Polish citizen, and all prisoners be they POWs, political detainees or Jews.

One major reason that the gas chamber horror story remains official history is due to Soviet propaganda, which had enormous Jewish contributions. Soviet Commissars were greeted by Jews when Stalin invaded Poland, because many of them were Jews themselves. In fact, why didn’t the West declare war on the USSR which invaded Poland like Germany? Well, the fact is that Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union. However, Hitler had freed German society and culture from the highly disproportionate and destructive influence of the Jews and was promptly branded as the Devil. The International Jew’s War was with the Germans and their Fuhrer, the USSR merely provided one of the front lines of attack. Fortunately, some rationalism remained in the West and after the war on that side of the Iron Curtain the so called “death camps” were forensically examined to reveal no homicidal gas chambers, but ones for standard fumigation purposes meant to prevent the spread of disease. The USSR leadership, to help keep the focus away from monstrous Soviet crimes, did not permit Western forensic investigators to inspect the “death camps” in Poland, nor did they carry out such an investigation by themselves. They just rebuilt (often clumsily) the destroyed parts of many of the camps to accentuate their own anti-German propaganda, which then played a key role in the Nuremberg Show Trials.

The large stone monument where the propaganda tour starts.

Today, it is being used as indoctrination information and that Israeli student tour group are in effect, its latest victims. They’re kids, they don’t know better and out of all the students on this planet who “learn” about the “Holocaust” it is those Israelis that probably get drilled like no other. First when they are impressionable young children under 12 at home, then they go on these school trips so that they can evoke their first passionate internal reactions. Then they will return home, finish high school, and go on to carry out their required military service, but by then they'll be packed with as much Jewish fanaticism, persecution myth and blind devotion to the blue hexagram as is possible. They are victims because they are being deliberately misinformed so that they can perpetuate the Zionist crimes and related madness. They are being primed to be hate-filled IDF criminals and then life-long Zionist fanatics.

The intensity of “education” can be seen even right during the tour. One girl started to cry, others sang a requiem of some sort by the crematorium ovens. There was also a little bit of vandalism that I spotted: there were these signs in a side room, shaped like gravestones, and each one had the name of one of the nationalities of “Holocaust” victims. The sign for The Germans was scratched and some of the letters had been scraped off. Some apt pupil had already learned what his masters want him to do.

Questioning the official mythos of this propaganda is a punishable crime in virtually every Western nation, except the United States where rational investigators are merely shunned, stigmatized, and passively secluded from their job, their peers, and the decent life the may have had before they asked a “wrong” question or two. Or reached an "improper" conclusion, however logical it may be. In Poland, an example of academic fortitude, Professor Dariusz Ratajczak, who published a booklet called “Tematy Niebezpieczne” (Eng. - “Dangerous Topics”) in March of 1999, which raised questions about the official Zionist Approved Story, saw his life disintegrate professionally and personally for just over 10 years until his murder, which was officially declared a suicide. The Israeli Mossad was known to be operating in Poland, a supposed ally to Israel, but the Zionists spy and perpetrate crimes against everyone, so are we really all that surprised?

There are still rationalist investigators for the truth working out there, like David Irving and Fredrick Toben. Both did time in prison and both push on in their mission of enlightening the World. They are also more known worldwide than Ratajczak was, so their prospective lethal subversion by the Mossad would not be as covert as the Zionist fanatics normally like their crimes to be.

Truth doesn’t fear investigation, yet “the Holocaust” does. What does that tell you? Even if you don’t see the folly of it all.

The War of Words: Storytelling Front

We are in a War of Words. There are many frontlines in this highly amorphous conflict. The Political Front may be the most obvious, but I believe that storytelling is also vital for this.

“An important prerequisite of a movement is a common vocabulary. The ability to form a unified front against Zionism, as well as the pursuit of Aryanism, requires clean and accurate expression of our positions. Emphasis must be placed on the use of common vocabulary by all supporters and allies of our movement.”

~Aryan Glossary

Thus, vocabulary is absolutely indispensable to the Aryan Movement, but words are only a means to a goal or ideal. Much like the National Socialist view on money, as a tool to serve a purpose and the lifeblood of an economy, words are the lifeblood of commincation, be it story/recollection, philosophy or political rhetoric. The Movement may be small now, but as it grows, there will be key ideas keeping it standing and goals still driving it forward. These ideas will have started as mere words and it is how we apply those words that will make the ideas, and goals that they lead to, uniquely Aryan.

In this article the reader can find an overview of the Campaign we find ourselves in. These ideas, however, will apply a little differently depending on role an Aryanist within the movement. A medic, a rifleman, and a radio operator may all be on the same general front line and may all have learned many of the same skills in basic training, but when the going gets real, each has a critically different duty to carry out so that the campaign proceeds forward.

Historically, storytelling has been a vital part of culture. Ancient Greece may be long gone, but Homer’s Odyssey is still being read and discussed. Der Fuhrer Adolf Hitler may have passed from this Earth, but Mein Kampf still lives strong. It can be said that this book was a key element in National Socialist mobilization in 1920s Germany. Ideas amount to nothing unless they are communicated, and so Der Fuhrer did just that. He effectively spoke to an entire nation - no scratch that - to the entire World with his book. The work contains many forms of written word: story/recollection, philosophy and political rhetoric. When it was being written, the NS movement was small and had just been overpowered and repressed, so this vital cornerstone that would prop it back up had to arch over many aspects in order to contain the full founding philosophy of a movement.

“First there was the Word.”

Mein Kampf was a major step in Adolf Hitler’s will to “recreate mankind anew.” The recreating of so many things anew needs to get more and more specific and storytelling is one of the next steps. I have looked at some films and media on this blog, in which I have identified both Aryan themes and ZC Propaganda. This is by no means an exhaustive examination of each story presented, but should serve as a springboard into the reader’s examination of their own favorite films. Note that Aryan themes are often subtle and in today’s mass-media they can usually be found in bits and pieces, here and there. Very few works are brimming with Aryanism, though there are exceptions like Cutthroat Island or ThunderCats.

Once a good sense of Aryanism is developped, identifying it in other streams of information should be easier. Today there is an immense amount of information flow, thus Aryanism has many potential routes, but also can be fairly easily drowned out in irrelevance. The mass-media is expert at creating programs that amount to Aldous Huxley’s imagined drug of Soma, thus it is easy to get lost and disoriented. On the other hand, this means that Aryanism, once spotted, is likely to be very obvious. Skepticism is always good for investigation, so take nothing at face value, but with a careful sense and dedication little shining embers of Arya will likely surprise you from very many different vantage points. Go to them!

Also important - Start to speak Aryan rhetoric so that when you are confronted by a Zionist or one of their lapdog goyim (i.e. an American neo-conservative) their words will be powerless. Kamerad Delendaestziobot wrote a good piece about rhetoric. Take careful note of how this applies to your chosen specialization within the Aryan Movement as well as generally. Again - medic, rifleman, radioman; all different, but part of the same unit.

Aryanism will only live if we live it. Or, the words of Ghandi, “You must be the change that you wish to see in the World.”

Tower of Babel
This is the Jewish paradigm for goy management. It applies to politics (capitalism vs. communism, right vs. left, etc…) as well as culture (social strife, religious conflict, etc…). To put it in brief, it is an idea to keep the goyim perpetually busy and yet achieve no progress. As the story goes, the people wanted to build a great tower to reach the heavens, but YHWH the Jewish idol, confused their speech and the tower was never finished. YHWH attacked their way with words to make unity impossible. Jewish over-influenced politics today is much the same thing - we have so much technology and capacity and labor power as well as people needing the work and wages, yet what gets done? A recent and iconic example would be left-wingers arguing with conservatives over a Mosque in downtown Manhattan. This conflict also played out along religious lines. The Jew can’t eliminate the Gentiles’ word, so he strives to make it useless and impotent by degrading it down to bickering. He does this all while ever refining his own words. Thus, today’s Tower can be seen as one of language and words, those that are needed to form a unity against the Jews, or the Aryan term, Unity through Nobility.

Work, work, work... and never get anything done.

ZC Propaganda Inc. routinely demonizes and vilifies everything the Jew disagrees with and it is a near perfect transposition of Kosher Slaughter into the form of word and story. Just take a look at some of the films glorifying violence, and especially the Quentin Tarantino trashterpiece Inglorious Basterds. Tarantino showed the film in Israel and the Jews cheered during the final mass slaughter of a shootout, since, in a bit of childish revisionism, Tarantino has Hitler shot to pieces in a Paris movie theatre to conclude the movie. Jews hate Hitler and despite that he has been dead for so long they still want to kill him brutally. Or see him die. The Jewish pleasure with slaughter never ceases to disgust. They literally feed themselves off of it. I direct the reader to my post on The Carnegie Deli to see just that I mean with that last sentence.

The Aryan Counter-Paradigm
Unity through Nobility, as I have said, is the motto behind the Aryan Movement, but our goal is NOT another (and better, stronger, etc…) Tower of Babel. That would be pointless. Our Aryan Counter-Paradigm is a Distillation Tower; only the noblest make it to the top and pass on to the infinity of Arya. Jews would think we’re playing with and stacking blocks… how wrong they are! We are recreating mankind anew with a complex new order that once in place for a solid amount of time, it will be impossible to imagine a different one. Our new system, and the words and stories that we’ll create within it, our new Noble Culture, will be increasingly impossible for the Jews to degrade. They have gotten used to same old thing, for one, but also, not enough people have actually attacked the Jew where it hurts him most - his tools for creating lies, namely his use of words. Render his production facilities useless and he’ll have to give up, and knowing the self-preserving nature of the Jew, he will.

Will you meet us at the top?

One example of this is that the popular term “anti-Semitism” (which is absurd to begin with, but hey, the Jews created it) went from meaning “envy of Jewish success” to “disgust towards Jewish racism” and the new catch phrase “an anti-Semite is not one who hates Jews, but one whom Jews hate” quickly started to make headway. One step in distillation has been made, a little lie reversed and the new meaning pure, but the process continues.

Another important aspect is that the Zionists’ (both Jews and Gentiles) main strategy has been effectively compromised.

Summary of Zionist trick:
1) Promote a policy that they know most people are too degraded to successfully execute.
2) Blame the policy instead of the people for the failure, allow their agents to reverse the policy and thus gain public trust.

Summary of Aryanist countermeasure:
1) Blame the people instead of the policy for the failure.
2) Make the policy work by gathering sufficiently capable people.

This reverse bluff paradigm applies to virtually the whole field of anti-Zionism. An Aryanist should see how it applies in their specialized field.

On the storytelling front, Hollywood plays a major role and all the Jewish owned studios routinely release films that echo what’s coming out of Washington DC. Just note the portrayal of Arabs throughout Hollywood’s history or for a specific example, just look at the film 300. I have a feeling that the recent film Prince of Persia: Sands of Time was a sort of apology from Hollywood about 300 and they finally showed Persia in a more pleasant light, however, they didn’t have any of the major roles played by Arabic actors and the main role went to Jake Gyllenhaal (Jew) and the film was produced by the Jerry Bruckheimer (Jew). Oh, Hollywood.

There are films that do contain genuine Aryan themes, some of which I have looked at here. An Aryanist’s examination of some their favorite films might reveal a deeper reason why they like them. Or maybe show that a film is actually un-Aryan. My opinion of many films that I used to greatly enjoy has changed much since I became an Aryanist. Right around the time that I started to read beyond the mainstream about the Third Reich, Tarantino’s Jewish fantasy from 2009 hit screens, and while I still viewed National Socialism as wrong at the time, I was approaching it from a rationalist view point (unlike the being spoon fed propaganda view point I had before) and the gleeful violence ending the film literally made me sick. I was only once before so furious at the stupidity of a movie before and that was when I saw Michael Bay’s Bad Boys 2 (another offering from the Jew, Bruckheimer) and it was also a spectacular disaster of gratuitous excess that all the goyim in the theatre cheered at. Perhaps, it’s odd that it took me this long to see past the goy illusion, literally it took all of college. Complex steps however, take time. As do campaigns. Aryanism is not an assembly line creation, it is expert craftsmanship and we are still all learning our trade. It took Adolf Hitler over ten years of hard work, which included prison time and the murder of Horst Wessel, among many other things, before his Kampf had a full scale mobilization. To create something genuine in a land of superficiality is hard work, especially when superficiality works day-to-day with illusion to create semblences of authenticity. And so it is, we must work hard and not lose our honorable standards. Never!

Prophet Mohammed, the Muslim's first teacher, lived by a much higher standard than he demanded of his followers. He was at the top of his movement, but not from pulling favors, he was fit to lead by his own honorable actions.

"The worst one of the people in the sight of God is the one who does not put his knowledge into practice." ~Mohammed

Archetypes
The historical archetype for the Jew is the Herder, the sly manipulator and profiteer from slaughter. Today this has been transposed into things like the corporate overlord and sleazy politician. The process remains the same, however, profiting from lies.

The Gentiles are historical Hunters, and the ever scheming Herder has invited them onto his game preserve to chase after his own animals keeping the consumer goyim ever busy trying to sustain themselves all while paying the Herder.

Aryans, the historical Farmers, never cared for quantity so much as for quality. Thus, the Herder’s monopolization has pushed the Aryans into small pockets here and there. Chances are that if someone, somehow, discovers Aryanism, they’ll be alone in their immediate area.

What binds us is our writing, our words. Be they stories, philosophy, political rhetoric, or even a short humorous anecdote. Though, stories remain unique and ever important, since they do not merely communicate the possibility of an idea, they show the idea in action via the art of fiction. This is a powerful tool that can be used without the compromising of one’s own honor. Use it.

"An idea that is developed and put into action is more important than an idea that exists only as an idea." ~Siddhartha

Aryan themes in “ThunderCats”

Movies, movies, movies… but now a little about television. More specifically, about a particular television show, ThunderCats, which first aired in January of 1985. I remember many 1980s and early 1990s TV shows as I was growing up at the time. I watched mainly GI Joe (with a typical young male military fascination) as well as some other zany, though fairly generic, cartoons like Tiny Toons and Bonkers that had all the classic cartoon slapstick gags such as falling anvils as well as all that silly and destructive, yet largely victimless, mayhem. Looking back at these cartoons now, there really isn’t much more to extract from them, they are mainly just simple fun for kids, though GI Joe is military propaganda through and through.

One show that I missed, however, was ThunderCats and I thank Kamerad Aryan Sanctuary for bringing it to my attention. Even when taken at face value, ThunderCats possesses something radically different about it than other shows of its time. Or from any time, really. Main reason being that ThunderCats has Aryan themes. Yes, the show is geared for kids, it’s a cartoon after all, and it does contain common storytelling devices, but the Aryanist factor is not just what happens, but how it happens. I’ll draw examples from some of the program’s first episodes.

Overview
The main story introduction tells us that the ThunderCats are all that’s left of a civilization from a now destroyed planet called Thundera. They were the civilization's nobility and among the ranks of the leaders of a folk. Now they must find a new home so that their civilization can continue. This very first episode is called “Exodus” and it may seem like a reference to the Jewish fabricated legend, but it in fact refers to the dispersal of the ancient Aryan Civilization. The facts have been greatly simplified for this cartoon show, but thematically it is consistent with reality. One needs to trail blaze just outside the mainstream media to find a wealth of information about the factual Aryan civilization and the seemingly “inexplicable” fact of why the swastika is probably the World’s most prominent (as well as most suppressed) symbol.

Lion-O, the heir to Thundera’s Leadership, is given a sword and his duty is explained to him by an aging mentor, who also tells the remaining Thunderans that their duty is to raise Lion-O so that he is fit to lead. There is an emphasis on “duty” which is a key part of an Aryan State, and the Code of Honor of Thundera even reads: Justice, Truth, Honor, Loyalty. This motto can be seen as a version of the SS motto: My Honor is Loyalty (with Justice and Truth implied as the SS was a Police Force when first established). The Sword of Omens that Lion-O receives is reflective of noble themes; knights had specially forged swords which is a tradition carried on to this day where it is customary for military officers to have a sword as part of their dress/parade uniform. The Sword of Omens even has a jewel at the base of the blade, just above the hilt, one that bears the ThunderCats’ emblem, which allows Lion-O “sight beyond sight” - a sort of divine knowledge - that he uses to summon his fellow warriors for help and into battle. This is likely a subtle reference to the Aryan Sun Circle, Greater Knowledge.

Perhaps the connection may be on a purely symbolic level, but I changed my mind on that when I noticed this picture:

Have you seen a similar banner composition and color scheme?

The antagonists of the story are known as the Mutants of which there are several brutishly cooperating groups. The leading group are the Reptilians that resemble snakes and lizards. They often use lies and manipulation to get their way, which equates them to the Snake People, a.k.a. Khazars - a violent tribe that was pushed from the steppes of Central Asia to near Europe where it adopted the monotheistic faith of Judaism as a matter of convenience to avoid conflict/maintain neutrality with their Christian neighbors to the West and with the Muslims to their South. Virtually all of today’s Jews (and the Talmud) can be ancestrally linked back to the Khazar Tribe. The Reptilians' allies are the Simians and Jackalmen, which are rather apt metaphors for many racist Gentiles. Monkeys were often used to convey primitivism in peoples (i.e. in Africans), but also in less offensive uses like the phrase “to go ape” meaning to get very angry for no real good reason, an example of succumbing to natural tendencies, which is essentially being primitive. The Simians here are just that. Next we have the Jackalmen; jackals are animals that hunt and scavenge flesh… a parallel with brutish Gentiles has just been made. Later episodes see the appearance of Vultureman (vultures too scavenge for carrion) and Ratar-o, a rat-like mutant, with real-life rats being creatures most concerned with procreation and surviving and not much else.

Upon landing on Third Earth (where the story’s action takes place) the Mutants come into contact with a demon-like being called Mumm-Ra. His name can be seen as a mistake for Amun-Ra, an ancient Egyptian deity, or even as a plagiarism. In fact, the Jewish Old Testament is essentially one long shameless rip-off of the religion of Kemet, an ancient African Civilization, in addition to other Jewish folly. Mumm-Ra also has a snake symbol, which links him to both the Snake People/Khazars and to Baphomet; his aura is that of a dark spiritual being alone in his chambers, rarely coming out, but frequently barking orders at subordinates while at the same time manipulating them for his own benefit. In short, Mumm-Ra is the fanatical Rabbi, one like Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who puppeteers atheistic Jews and Gentiles (though many may have some superficial beliefs in the Eternal) to carry out his Zionist scheme, which first and foremost involves silencing all Aryans. Mumm-Ra covets the Sword of Omens, which is a symbol of the power of the Swastika, and his main effort to steal it is to slyly convince the Mutants to get it for him so that he can then destroy the ThunderCats. Mumm-Ra's entire existence can be summed up as "desire for power and hate for all" - the latter even includes himself as Mumm-Ra cannot bear to look at his own reflection, seeing it turns him into a decaying corpse, a vessel with no soul, since he is just that. As long as he doesn't see this reflection and what he really is, the illusion he projects is so powerful that it even fools himself - self-imposed delusion.

Lastly, there is also a group of Goys, the Brute Men, whose looks can be described as anthro-cattle. The Mutants enslave them and force them to build a fortress. The Brute Men are honest beings, they mean no harm and do no harm, but they are being manipulated by the Zionists. Their salvation comes from the Noble Aryans who free them so that they can live their lives free and in peace. A key idea here is that the ThunderCats see the Brute Men much like the Mutants do, but noble peoples do not enslave under any circumstance.

“I agree with the Jews that most people are cattle. I merely disagree with how they should be treated.”

          ~John Alan Martinson Jr.

In fact, the ThunderCats at first even politely refuse an offer of help to build their own home base on Third Earth before finally accepting after the offer is insisted upon by some new found friends, the Ro-Bear Berbils.

Three-Way Conflict
The most important real world parallel that ThunderCats draws is the conflict with three simultaneous front lines. The ThunderCats are fighting, in effect, two other groups, not one. Mumm-Ra, by his own actions and own choosing, is separate from the Mutants. The Mutants, technically, also have the same stance on the situation. They have joined forces for the sake of convenience, but still operate independently, and wouldn’t hesitate to lash out with betrayal once they felt that they have gained enough. Essentially, the Mutants and Mumm-Ra have on loose terms joined forces just to put off destroying one another until after they achieve their goal of Aryan destruction. Thus each side involved has TWO opponents with the Mutants and Mumm-Ra the advantage of their “non-aggression pact.” However, this agreement is highly unstable and the ThunderCats have the advantage of much more unified movements from their warriors. Less is more when it’s optimized.

Interestingly, the episode in which the Mutants ally with Mumm-Ra is called “The Unholy Alliance.” A most appropriate name for a pact between two nefarious and self-obsessed groups.

Even if Mumm-Ra and the Mutants are seen as ONE group, thus apparently making the conflict two-sided, a third side is still present in the form of unaffiliated Gentile tribes that find their way into the conflict. In episode 6, the Mutants and Mumm-Ra do not appear at all, but a ship of creatures called the Berserkers shows up and immediately does what Gentiles/Jews would do: start exploiting other creatures. The Berserkers attempt to hunt down unicorns and the ThunderCats defend the horned equines despite never having been in contact with them before for. They do not yet stand for the unicorns, but they do stand against what the Berserkers are trying to do to them. The three-sided conflict isn’t about literal front lines, but that of ideas.

Jews/Zionists may possibly ally with Gentiles based on selfish motivation.

Gentile tribes may ally possibly with each other or Jews/Zionists based selfish motivation.

Aryan groups ally based on shared ideals and never with Jews.

The Aryan advantage is that Aryans are also willing to accept Gentiles if their ideals are in agreement, which would actually make them not Gentiles, but actually Aryans discovered from among society's dissimulation. These new recruits may then go on to join the Aryan Movement fulltime. On the flipside, self-obsessed Jews would never consider taking a Gentile ally into the ranks of Jewry, for allies of the Zionists are really just goys who will be shunned the moment their usefulness to Jewry is over. Thus “allies” of the Jews are just people who have been successfully conned into thinking there is an alliance. Or a Gentile may think that they have successfully conned the Jews into a pact, but such an agreement does not genuinely exist in either circumstance. Mumm-Ra and the Mutants have such an arrangement, both sides are ready to dump the other at the moment most opportune for their own group. The irony is that their in-group altruism is both what temporarily binds them while being the factor that is destined to tear them apart.

Aryans choose allies with whom they genuinely feel that they can work with. Thus the only true alliance is an Aryan one, or simply a noble one. When forming a coalition, Jews and Gentiles agree to disagree. They are sweeping dirt under the rug. When forming a coalition, Aryans agree on ideals, thus Aryans may be forced to only ally with other Aryans, but are also, in effect, already allied with those other Aryans since Nobility is immortal. They only need to make contact another Aryan group and only work out details on who performs what necessary duties, but the alliance is written in their shared nobility. Such is the meeting between the ThunderCats and the caretakers of the Unicorns. Jews would type out contracts and agreements, with exceptions, conditions and interest rates while Aryans just proceed with universalism. An noble group is an ally. An ignoble one is an enemy, be it Jewish or Gentile.

Bits and Pieces
The care takers of the Unicorns have crescent moon shapes on their staffs and star shapes on their foreheads. The crescent moon and star form the main icon of Islam, which includes teachings on animal welfare.

The Sword of Omens is only used to fight enemies and violence is never initiated with it.

The ThunderCats never fight innocents, not even the manipulated Brute Men, but instead break them out of their trance.

There are really many details like this all throughout. Each one by itself really doesn’t mean anything, but as a whole they do form a theme. Another very minute example is when in one scene the Thunder Tank, while in boat form, is going ahead unusually slow, so Panthro, who's driving, flushes out some sort of intake causing fish that were stuck inside to pop out. Panthro then smiles as he watches them swim away. This may not seem like much, but he did just save those fish from dying and was clearly happy to have done so. Thus, this little moment fits into the overall Aryan theme.

Conclusion
While this remains a kids’ show, it does have levels of comprehension, much like Aesop’s Fables are not just about talking animals. There is a message here that goes well beyond the typical good vs. bad story structure. Much of the message is conveyed through character actions instead of just dialog. There is also a much smaller aspect of fancy aesthetics here than in, say, GI Joe or Transformers. Those shows that not only were totally based in the Good vs. Bad (left vs. right, conservative vs. liberal, etc…) paradigm, but had a strong focus on elaborate military technologies and were packed with explosive action scenes in each episode. ThunderCats is a much smarter example of storytelling since not only kids have something of interest here.

There is also a revamp of the series due out in 2011. We’ll see whether this reboot remains true to Aryanism, or if Jews picked it up to taint and ultimately destroy the memory of this show with their corruption and plagiarism.

----------------------------------
Fan Sites:
ThunderCats Lair & ThunderCatsFans
----------------------------------

See Also:
He-Man review Part I & Part II